the entropy of twitter has decreased. the slop to life ratio has gone up. the gini coefficient has increased. there are fewer posts that get lots of attention and many posts that get few attention.
the beauty of twitter was the simcluster, where 90% of the tweets in my feed came from one of the many organic sef-organizing communities i was part of. now it's maybe 20%. i used to daily discover intelligent schizomaniacs, now they are diffuse among the slop
twitter is not about content. twitter is about community and interconnection. it should be run as a bloated service organization disguised as a tech startup rather than a cutthroat business
when you prioritize engagement on any platform, viral memes, self help slop, linkedin "insight" threads, dating content, celebrity pics, porn replies, etc takes over
'free speech' is somewhat better in theory. community notes are a good innovation. in practice intelligent right wingers got away with anything they wanted even in 2020 twitter and now the middest idiots have been promoted to have a voice
the platform feels zombified like a slave to optimization in a way it wasn't before. the hundred flowers do not bloom and the thousand schools of thought do not contend
even the hiding of the likes means the reduction of entropy. if all likes are equally meaningful there are fewer and less diverse signals about what makes good content to promote on my feed. blue check has been a disaster obv and did nothing to alleviate the bot problem
small addendum:
twitter was about elites chatting among elites. the most important discourse on earth. the old bluecheck system helped ensure this. there was a chance for lowbies to be upwardly mobile but still centered the elite
i take personal offense because i consider this account to be one of the great projects of my life and it feels kind of over due to platform degradation
@soona@dwr@varunsrin idk i've seen too many twitter alternatives go nowhere to consider this viable. i think for a new social media to be successful it has to have major traction among some group of elites that i want to listen to and then also broad appeal, it's basically impossible
this ratio will determine whether we enter a future of total symbolic shred, the decay of meaning into nihilism, or if a trillion psychofauna bloom creating more meaning than ever existed before, leaving our old attachments feeling rather provincial
computers are terrible -- every advancement in artificial intelligence is a prayer that no human will have to experience the undiluted madness of computers again
@campeters4 idk sir i was following all the dissident right wing twitter heads since i got on here jin 2019 and they were making insane schizophilosophical threads. they would suffer the banhammer once in a while but they were systematically thriving
@FreedomHamilton@wyqtor To be clear I am 100% pro free speech and free expression
my wording is unclear but I meant the implementation is only better in theory
even when discussing technological acceleration the stated reasons are economic to make it more palatable -- reduce suffering, increase wealth, etc -- when the real drive is the glory and immortality of mankind and especially of the people building the machine age
it doesn't make any sense to me to wonder 'whats in it for sama ... he owns no equity' and yet this is a very common question anywhere outside of san francisco
do you really think there's a monetary value that compares against the glory of delivering ASI to mankind
>dads a libertarian
>moms a democrat
>registered republican
>donate to biden, but clearly as a troll
>shoot former president, miss
>explain nothing
>die
>leave no manifesto
what did he mean by this
fear not. none of the companies involved will likely capture most of the gains from AGI. the technology will benefit all of humanity though maybe not any specific fund
this is not just true of AGI but of all historical technological revolutions. intellectual capital is diffuse so the consumer captures most of the value
people get mad at any model release that’s not immediately agi or a frontier capabilities improvement. think for a second why was this made? how did this research artifact come to be? what is it on the path to?
there are clearly fates far worse than death … the punishment of the titans in Tartarus; the circles of hell in Dante are clearly allegorical conditions that ppl find themselves in. repeating the same failures ad infinitum. the best thing that ever happened to China was Mao died
@micsolana nah this is absolute bullshit dan hendrycks could’ve made a fortune working in ai but chose to pursue an ai safety nonprofit and also is a close advisor to @elonmusk and xai
being afraid of existential risk from ai progress is prudent and advisable and if you reflexively started making fun of this viewpoint in the last ~two years after ai entered your radar you need to self reflect
agents will probably generate order of magnitude more revenue than chatbots but both will end up being tiny easter eggs to fund the capex for superintelligence
as we approach superintelligence more global gpu capacity will counterintuitively shift from product inference to research because the superhuman ai researchers will make better use of them
i live 3 blocks from here it’s been safe for more than a year and a half and essentially clean since november . i straight up don’t believe the story about gangs violently doing drugs or whatever outside X or whatever https://x.com/squirtle_says/status/1814722543162700246
@jarletta_@Teknium1@dionysianyawp@sama okay code interpreter ended up less impressive in its initial version than I thought this will still be true in the long run
@jarletta_@Teknium1@dionysianyawp@sama elon has been promising FSD since 2015 but I forgive him because the final product is indeed a miracle and will change
the world and was inevitable since he started talking about it
@jacobrintamaki you need some gear on the inside. due to unimpeachable laws of physics the attenuation of electrical signal through the skull is too bad to ever get high bandwidth I/O
@jacobrintamaki we can reduce the amount of gear on the inside, say by using biological electrodes instead of wires. and computers will continue getting smaller so it could possibly lay flat against the skull but i'm not holding my breath
prediction markets are really having a moment. back in my day you could only bet a maximum of $600 per market on predictit and then lose 15% of your profits to platform fees. now you can lose millions in high liquidity well capitalized markets 🥰 https://x.com/Polymarket/status/1815115526043017727
@jeremyphoward code interpreter development didn’t go the way i expected. I can’t really explain what happened here except to say that the future called once again
beware of putting too much stock in your heroes. greatness is a transitory phenomenon. it is never consistent
the gods briefly act through Men and then leave them to their ordinary fate
@TenreiroDaniel i got everything right in that except for the fact that i badly misunderstood/neglected instruction tuning / rlhf which was already published at the time
the mRNA cellular printer will serve as the programming interface between superintelligence and the human body. if adversaries can make bioweapons in seconds so too can we distribute biodefenses
when did the singularity become inevitable? chatgpt? scaling law Kaplan et al? gpt2? transformer? alphazero? I believe replicating important cognitive functions in silico was predictably inevitable since the hardware acceleration of deep learning circa 2012. thank you ilya 🙏
it was clear even then that amd sucked at software and nvidia drivers were flawless even rendering random games
the avg pc gaming fan who bought some nvidia shares because they were making banger hardware and increasingly taking all the margins in the build is killing it rn
+ there’s a clear line from cloud gaming to nvidia’s datacenter business and Mellanox acquisition. compute was going to be centralized since bandwidth was going to the moon and every popular game was multiplayer
distributing model weights and making the technology easy to access aren’t actually equivalent. the vast majority of people who come into contact with an AI do so with a llm provider like OpenAI or Google and this would be true even if OSS models were strictly better
this character ai implosion is ftc antitrust carnage. in a sane world goog would have acquired the whole company and all the employees would have made out well. instead they have to gut it for its core talent and leave everyone else in the dying husk of the company
this warps capital markets and discourages innovation of all kinds. potential startup employees will be looking for big tech jobs instead. total own goal
dad why are we poor? well son there was a minor market panic and i sold everything right before the technological singularity and now we’re part of the permanent underclass
it’s more like there are two groups, a 1/3 -1/2 minority that reacts very positively and the other doesn’t react at all (based on sensitivity to serotonin)
as far as I can tell micro dose ssri is systematically underrated. Nootropics bros will try one million piracetam variants that don’t do anything but never lexapro
the federated court system means that state judges in new york get to interrogate the principles of international finance, Delaware gets to define the rules of corporate governance, and California courts will end up adjudicating matters involving the birth of digital minds
im basically not concerned about deepfakes of any kind because its an area where the offense defense energetic balance is well on the side of defense. discriminating a fake photo requires 1000x less compute than generating one. discriminating a fake video 1,000,000x less
and you don’t even need to scan every photo on your platform to identify bad actors. you can sub sample to identify catfish accounts and make sure you’re running the discriminator on everything going viral so there’s no mass manipulation
imo there is probably no viable regulation that will even mildly affect the probability of an ai risk event. only the work of many brilliant security engineers and alignment scientists can do that
@Liviansdad I think whether rogue actors create unaligned models is somewhat less important than the methods to safely align superintelligent models actually existing and being public knowledge
@ilex_ulmus@Gestalt_enjoyer that’s probably fair but i also don’t think this cooperation is at all possible and if you believe agi is as potentially dangerous as you or i think it is then doubly so
@ilex_ulmus@Gestalt_enjoyer the nuclear treaties didn’t work the bioweapons treaties didn’t work and I don’t see why this would work when it’s exponentially more important strategic objective than those
@tr_babb okay but explain this to me -- in everett there are branching universes on every wavefunction collapse? but if wavefunction collapses here the state of the other particle is known there
there is still global nonlocal state isn't there?
@Council__@flyerthenag6 this account predicts something will be launched every single day with zero details lmao. don’t get me wrong I actually enjoy the content but it’s performance art
unfortunately ai is religious whether you blind yourself to it or not
on matters of birthing new minds and new species and altering what it means to be human there’s no other angle you can take https://x.com/somewheresy/status/1824419170403889592
@growing_daniel I have lived on top of an abandoned Walgreens like 12,000 sqft in one of the busiest intersections in the city for more than 2 years and nothing has changed and this space isn’t being used and I’m disgusted by the inefficiency
too much learning programming slop on the TL. i reimplemented my ass in pure C type stuff. they’re doing this because “learning” programming is now fairly easy and the machine does 90% of it for you
if you’re having a straightforwardly good time and aren’t once in a while beating your head on the wall or staying up too late stuck on something you’re probably not learning
the set of minds that are easily findable by a reasonable number of steps of first order search based fine tuning ⊆ the set of minds that are reachable on the manifold of human language ⊆ the space of minds that are possible
@growing_daniel the primary function of post training teams is to make models more practically intelligent. it’s possible we fail in myriad ways but I doubt oss is doing better
@growing_daniel your expectations are rising in line with the model capabilities, i sincerely doubt the current model is holistically worse than where we started. thats good tho. customer is divinely discontent
@growing_daniel i feel there’s something about the tech tree that’s in a local minimum in terms of multi turn convos. it’s interesting that multiple LLM products are like this
@alex33902241@growing_daniel very little of post training is about model safety stuff. for the most part everyone is focused on making the models more capable and improving hard metrics. it’s possible the metrics are measuring the wrong thing
@alex33902241@growing_daniel I guess you need to answer why or how the current model does so much better than the old ones in LMSYS even on the coding prompts category. it’s clearly not all around worse. it may be worse in ways that are hard to measure
one weird thing is that people who are addicted to working get the most say about the future of products and culture. but people who work a lot are really strange people several deviations off of the center
@mahaoo_ASI no, and this is entirely my own fault, but I don’t want my public life to be only just “knower of unholy technological secrets” and every tweet imputed to be about the next gpt or whatever
“is the Common Man afraid of artificial intelligence”- the greatest thread in the history of slack, locked by a moderator after 12,239 pages of heated debate,
you are getting laser scanned and uploaded to the google cloud whenever a waymo passes within 3 blocks of you. they are simulating your entire mind and body to predict your next movements. they spin up a trillion instances of you to run monte carlo search
the truth for most of the computer age is that it required new entrants to use the technology and disrupt their older competitors who had to be dragged into modernity kicking and screaming and sometimes altogether killed, rather than a pleasant learning and diffusion process
the difference with ai is that there *may not* be meaningful difference in intelligence between an ai that can program super well and one that can redesign workflows and one that can start businesses
in the ideal world you trust the agi so completely that you'd rather let it run free and do things beyond your comprehension far beyond your ability to supervise and you feel much safer than if a human was at the helm
safety is a stopgap for alignment
putting agis in blackboxes and restricted environments and human/machine supervision are conditions you undertake when you haven't solved alignment
also that the Battle School -> Command School pipeline is more or less exactly how the french wartime military academies worked. Napoleon was enrolled in a military academy at age 9 and many were younger
enders game felt a bit silly spending that amount of resources on a child commander until you study Napoleon and realize that finding the an outlier battle commander is like an ungodly force of nature that dominates pretty much every other variable
using a frontier ai is less like summoning an alien intelligence and more like going avatar state and channeling the accumulated skills of every brilliant human that recorded themselves before you. the heritage and future of humankind
@ESYudkowsky there are many obvious reasons why being able to identify ai text levels many of the skill smoothing advantages such as e.g. employers filtering out all resumes from ESL candidates
@robinhanson if we fr cared about libyans or iraqis and not just appearing morally forthright we would've done this. similarly if bill gates really cared about incremental progress for health outcomes he would engage in machiavellian statecraft
@robinhanson the current solution space of destroy a warlord so three other warlords can take his place are the moral solutions of a well resourced child
There stood a hill not far whose griesly top
Belch'd fire and rowling smoak; the rest entire
Shon with a glossie scurff, undoubted sign
That in his womb was hid metallic Ore,
The work of Sulphur. Thither wing'd with speed
A numerous Brigad hasten'd. As when Bands
Of Pioners with Spade and Pickax arm'd
Forerun the Royal Camp, to trench a Field,
Or cast a Rampart. Mammon led them on,
Mammon, the least erected Spirit that fell
From heav'n, for ev'n in heav'n his looks and thoughts
Were always downward bent, admiring more
The riches of Heav'ns pavement, trod'n Gold,
Then aught divine or holy else enjoy'd
In vision beatific: by him first
Men also, and by his suggestion taught
Ransack'd the Center, and with impious hands
Rifl'd the bowels of thir mother Earth
For Treasures better hid. Soon had his crew
Op'nd into the Hill a spacious wound
And dig'd out ribs of Gold. Let none admire
That riches grow in Hell; that soyle may best
Deserve the precious bane. And here let those
Who boast in mortal things, and wond'ring tell
Of Babel, and the works of Memphian Kings
Learn how thir greatest Monuments of Fame,
And Strength and Art are easily out-done
By Spirits reprobate, and in an hour
What in an age they with incessant toyle
And hands innumerable scarce perform.
Nigh on the Plain in many cells prepar'd
That underneath had veins of liquid fire
Sluc'd from the Lake, a second multitude
With wond'rous Art found out the massie Ore,
Severing each kind, and scum'd the Bullion dross:
A third as soon had form'd within the ground
A various mould, and from the boyling cells
By strange conveyance fill'd each hollow nook,
As in an Organ from one blast of wind
To many a row of Pipes the sound-board breaths.
Anon out of the earth a Fabrick huge
Rose like an Exhalation, with the sound
Of Dulcet Symphonies and voices sweet,
Built like a Temple, where Pilasters round
Were set, and Doric pillars overlaid
With Golden Architrave; nor did there want
Cornice or Freeze, with bossy Sculptures grav'n,
The Roof was fretted Gold. Not Babilon,
Nor great Alcairo such magnificence
Equal'd in all thir glories, to inshrine
Belus or Serapis thir Gods, or seat
Thir Kings, when Aegypt with Assyria strove
In wealth and luxurie. Th' ascending pile
Stood fixt her stately highth, and strait the dores
Op'ning thir brazen foulds discover wide
Within, her ample spaces, o're the smooth
And level pavement: from the arched roof
Pendant by suttle Magic many a row
Of Starry Lamps and blazing Cressets fed
With Naphtha and Asphaltus yeilded light
As from a sky. The hasty multitude
Admiring enter'd, and the work some praise
And some the Architect: his hand was known
In Heav'n by many a Towred structure high,
Where Scepter'd Angels held thir residence,
And sat as Princes, whom the supreme King
Exalted to such power, and gave to rule,
Each in his Hierarchie, the Orders bright.
Nor was his name unheard or unador'd
In ancient Greece; and in Ausonian land
Men call'd him Mulciber; and how he fell
From Heav'n, they fabl'd, thrown by angry Jove
Sheer o're the Chrystal Battlements; from Morn
To Noon he fell, from Noon to dewy Eve,
A Summers day; and with the setting Sun
Dropt from the Zenith like a falling Star,
On Lemnos th' Aegaean Ile: thus they relate,
Erring; for he with this rebellious rout
Fell long before; nor aught avail'd him now
To have built in Heav'n high Towrs; nor did he scape
By all his Engins, but was headlong sent
With his industrious crew to build in hell.
parts of the executive regulatory state should be headquartered where the thing they’re governing is concentrated or it will never be a serious enterprise
@fifth_sign im suggesting a regulatory state with respect for their industry and vice versa would be collocated. until such time each will have to regard each other as the enemy
@Altimor god im glad people are discovering the difficulties of claude post training so i can defend them without remorse and cant be accused of shilling
@repligate@AnthropicAI I’m guessing the copyright eval was performing so poorly the lawyers insisted they do something fast and they resort to a blunt instrument like this
“This event felt like the startup version of the Potsdam Conference——“
You bolt awake in the mountains of Carthage. You are not online. It is 217 BC. You are the general Hannibal, and you have changed your mind. The future cannot come to pass. Rome must burn.
@MediumSpicyPepe glory in war is for all intents and purposes a thing of the past and if you stake your manhood on it then you will remain a boy forever
it’s funny that Ted chiang wrote that short story / sermon about empathizing with parrots before looking for alien intelligence but doesn’t recognize the aliens that landed in his backyard
“In particular, the virtues and ambitions called forth by war are unlikely to find expression in liberal democracies. There will be plenty of metaphorical wars—corporate lawyers specializing in hostile takeovers who will think of themselves as sharks or gunslingers, and bond traders who imagine, as in Tom Wolfe’s novel The Bonfire of the Vanities, that they are “masters of the universe.” (They will believe this, however, only in bull markets.) But as they sink into the soft leather of their BMWs, they will know somewhere in the back of their minds that there have been real gunslingers and masters in the world, who would feel contempt for the petty virtues required to become rich or famous in modern America. How long megalothymia will be satisfied with metaphorical wars and symbolic victories is an open question. One suspects that some people will not be satisfied until they prove themselves by that very act that constituted their humanness at the beginning of history: they will want to risk their lives in a violent battle, and thereby prove beyond any shadow of a doubt to themselves and to their fellows that they are free. They will deliberately seek discomfort and sacrifice, because the pain will be the only way they have of proving definitively that they can think well of themselves, that they remain human beings.”
- Francis Fukuyama, The End of History
when goku's best friend krillin is murdered by the galactic emperor frieza and he finally achieves the legendary super saiyan form it's a Homeric metaphor to achilles' prophesied history-making rage being set afire by the death of patroclus
climbing everest and traveling the world and things like that are well trodden. mankind's mastery of the elements means that thousands of people circumnavigate the globe in little skiffs as a hobby and not many even know
technology remains a true adventure. when a real paradigm shift comes along the laws of men can't argue. no matter who wishes otherwise we cohabit the world with running electricity, nuclear weapons, artificial intelligence, and the leylines of civilizations have to shift with it
@aidan_mclau why not try it and find out? one of the great reasons to even have an api is that ppl like you with advanced real world use cases test them out and find their various strengths and weaknesses and accelerate agi progress
as for the pricing I have no idea
@aidan_mclau deleted the reply bc it was too flippant sorry
I think the big thing with chatgpt-latest is that developers were asking for parity with the latest chat model so this is that
@ESYudkowsky yeah but predicting molecular binding affinity is one thing. is it stable in cells? does it interfere with other protein targets? is it toxic in strange ways? do you need absurd concentrations for it to make any difference?
@jeneserois nah probably just the actual systems biology that leads to new good targets and such. plus the actual insanely hard part of making sure it works in humans
@jeneserois i don’t think the us drug regulations are that bad. there’s a bit of corruption and capture but really the fda doesn’t want to stop you from selling a groundbreaking lifesaving drug. they may even be too lenient sometimes
it’s the mark of a poor society that has to be strictly darwinistic and throw all the unhealthy babies off a cliff and grind the infirm into dust and whatever
@BorjomiDrinker you don’t need to help me. my family and I make this country better by being here.
we’re honest people that do good work. you don’t suffer for our being here. as far as I can tell you benefit
my colleagues are genuinely brave as hell for exploring the limits of intelligence allowed by computation and physics day over day
these experiments can be expensive and nerve wracking and a lot of people are counting on you
every day you step into the micro kitchen and people tell you things that are world changing and genre defining and kind of scary and they roll with the punches
@pmarca will matter until the ai is a couple sigma away from the smartest human and then it’s marginal
moreover the smartest person in any organization is not the most powerful
likewise it makes no sense to think that language models will evolve all important cognitive skills exactly in tandem with humans. we can very easily have models that have the programming output of a corporation but are hopeless at figuring out how buy and run a gas station