@tszzl — page 9/103

2020-01-31 → 2020-02-13 · posts 4001–4500 of 51,350
· ↳ reply to @ahardtospell
@ahardtospell You have to find a perfect Zen between starved and stuffed to go shopping, otherwise you’ll come back with the wrong amount
2 ♥ · x.com →
Smart people are too skeptical of AI and ML because the consultant class has hooked onto these terms to leech money from the credulous But never forget that we’ve solved computer vision and speech recognition in the last 5 years, and close to real time universal translation
269 ♥ · 25 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
Not to mention beaten Go, pro-level Starcraft, etc
21 ♥ · x.com →
@traditionrevolt we don’t really even understand what self awareness is, but neither did the evolutionary machine that built us. I feel we’ll probably stumble across it before we recognize it for what it is
@Teleonomic If I knew this I’d be working on it myself :)
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tiffani
@tiffani @miles_k @impcapital @nabeel What are those wrong reasons exactly? Do you have a monopoly on reasons to do good things? It’s more selfish to help your neighbor who’s struggling mildly vs the child half way across the world who’s struggling mightily. All human lives have value; not merely American ones
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@tiffani @miles_k @impcapital @nabeel Thomas Hobbes said it best; humans help others for selfish reasons. It causes us pain to look upon someone struggling, and drives us to help. But to work on alleviating struggling that you can’t even see is exceptional
· ↳ reply to @tiffani
@tiffani @miles_k @impcapital @nabeel what is it that you think bang for your buck means? do you think they're profiting off of giving money to the right areas? do you hate efficiency? i'm truly confused. when you have limited resources and vast ocean of people suffering, you should spend it wisely.
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@Teleonomic but I do think we are on the cusp of building production-level factory robots that can learn
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tiffani
@tiffani @miles_k @impcapital @nabeel well, for example we recently saw Marc Benioff give $30 million to end homelessness in SF and pat himself on the back ceaselessly for doing so. These funds probably won't even help house a 1000 people for 10 years
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@tiffani @miles_k @impcapital @nabeel whereas e.g. the Gates Foundation has given away bed netting to prevent malaria in high-risk regions. They estimate that every $3000 spent on bed netting saves a human life. That's 10,000 human lives saved with Benioff's "generous" donation
· ↳ reply to @tiffani
@tiffani @miles_k @impcapital @nabeel you're making a strangely capitalist argument regarding people selfishly choosing things that are of particular interest to them to donate. wasn't really expecting this. mostly agree with you though
@AOCummies Adam the First Simp requested that god make him an egirl
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @_jinyeom
@jinyeom95 Looks like sota is 98.7%, which is pretty close. But we literally have autonomous cars driving around so it’s hard to say vision hasn’t been “solved”. I’m sure there’s lots of improvements left to make but it’s a 0->1 jump from having no vision to having vision
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @anomiseditrix
@anomiseditrix Every day millions of people speak to their voice assistants and get pretty good results. This is just moving the goalposts tbh
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@jinyeom95 By solved I don’t mean that there’s nothing left to do. I mean we can do these things at a level of reliability that they can be productized
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
Loling because there’s a bunch of academics agreeing with me and a bunch disagreeing. But my everyday experience doesn’t deceive : my phone scans my face to let me in and I can talk to it reliably
15 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @hondanhon
@hondanhon @jinyeom95 i mean you seem really angry at me when we just have a semantic disagreement on what solved means. it's clear there's been a step function change on the capabilities of CV in the last decade
5 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@hondanhon it doesn’t just work for me, it works for the billions of people using CV and speech recognition enabled products across the world
· ↳ reply to @hondanhon
@hondanhon @jinyeom95 So if a technology is negatively effecting someone it isn’t solved lol? What kind of heuristic is that! We definitely solved nuclear weapons, but that didn’t make anyone in Hiroshima happy
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@hondanhon @jinyeom95 Tech is a blunt weapon that you can use for evil or good or something in between. In the coming decade, the Chinese will use CV to create an authoritarian panopticon. They can do so because CV has matured. We will also use CV to save thousands of lives from driving accidents
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @_jinyeom
@jinyeom95 @hondanhon I’m not sure what I’m conceding to. It seems we’re politically bickering over what “solved” means. I’m fully ovr that there’s conferences like CVPR and that CV is an active research area. But it’s matured to a point where we can do very cool things with it. This important to note
@shelbyspees @hondanhon @jinyeom95 shelby, thanks for your response. I get where you're coming from, but I have to say that I feel there's probably no technological system that's 100% fallible, and thank god we have a stable regulatory system for testing dangerous things like autonomous driving
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@shelbyspees @hondanhon @jinyeom95 i'd say online payments is solved and yet there's probably some reasonably amount of theft and data loss every year. my point being: CV is a tech that's rapidly maturing and everybody should be looking into what they can do with it.
· ↳ reply to @hondanhon
@hondanhon @jinyeom95 the burden of proof will always be on the technologist to demonstrate that they're doing better than human level. no amount of my tweets will change that.
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@hondanhon @jinyeom95 autonomous cars will not be legalized until the tech companies have proven that they're 10x safer than human drivers. all technologies will have an error rate. it's as simple as this: does it do better than a human? if so, it's irresponsible NOT to deploy it
· ↳ reply to @antimule
@antimule I think often the hangups with self-driving systems are not the vision module but rather the driving logic systems. these tend to be brittle and unable to adapt to novel situations at the moment
4 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @_jinyeom
@jinyeom95 @hondanhon this is the "black box" argument, but as I always repeat -- humans are black boxes too. How do we fix the fact that humans fall asleep at the wheel sometimes?
· ↳ reply to @hondanhon
@hondanhon @jinyeom95 i mean, this wasn't really a utilitarian claim. I didn't say the good outweighs the bad or anything like that. more a statement of observations. you seem to be grafting arguments you've seen prior onto mine
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @_jinyeom
@jinyeom95 @hondanhon ok, I have a question for you. What empirical testable thing would you need to see to be able to call computer vision "solved"? Is it nothing short of AGI?
· ↳ reply to @_jinyeom
@jinyeom95 @hondanhon I appreciate that there is ambiguity, but like I said, if we think like this then literally nothing is ever solved. when CV topples some big milestone, we will continually move the goalposts. which is why I am choosing my own subjective definition. feel free to disagree w me
· ↳ reply to @hondanhon
@hondanhon @jinyeom95 I think my basic point is that underestimating the capabilities of these techs is as egregious as overestimating them. That's lots of human welfare left on the table.
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@hondanhon @jinyeom95 on the day to day, I experience more AI pessimism than optimism, but I understand it can be grating if the opposite is true for you
@AOCummies stupid game they’re playing bc outbreaks should be exponential not linear 🤔
6 ♥ · x.com →
@CascadianSolo fair enough but it’s immensely stupid to “test” someone before their first date. I think what actually happened is that the text she sent was true and she made up a story for twitter to save face and get attention
9 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
Another indication CV is solved: as OpenAI and DeepMind grapple with real time games, their agents directly interface with API observations instead of reading the gamescreen: they know it can be done, so they’d rather save the compute time
9 ♥ · x.com →
@shelbyspees @jinyeom95 By productize I mean “deliver valuable outcomes to real people in search, social networks, medicine, consumer electronics, cars, etc etc etc”. This is all happening today. You seem to have interpreted my tweet for the slimiest possible version of “productized”
· ↳ reply to @akhivae
@akhivae This 5% figure is drastically understated, Christians in rural areas rarely indicate they’re Christians on official censuses
1 ♥ · x.com →
ATM I wouldn’t trust an AI system to make kill decisions, but keep in mind the alternative is sending out a trigger happy 18 year old to kill or be killed. It would be great to see the future of warfare be entirely about our robots fighting their robots https://x.com/nypost/status/1223669369143808005
21 ♥ · x.com →
@dickcheneyscou1 true, the real endgame is that both sides can predict with perfect accuracy who’ll win and avoid the whole shebang
Still reeling from when @clairlemon claimed you couldn’t prove anything about real life by analyzing theoretical data distributions, thereby destroying the entire field of statistics
10 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
time to bring these memes back to swing the iowa caucus
11 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
absolutely ethered, because this is the nerd version of "i look so ugly in this pic Q.Q"
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Tyler_The_Wise
@Tyler_The_Wise @_chismosa_ The job is paying you for a service. You are paying the professor for a service. We’re seriously Stockholm Syndrome’d when it comes to universities
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @cinjoncin
@cinjoncin Correct me if I’m wrong, but most of these seem like a train set augmentation issue? the limitation is with the data economics. when there is sufficient demand for some currently out of distribution classifier, someone will collect the data
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@cinjoncin This is not to be flippant about e.g. people with regional accents who are inconvenienced, but to say that we won’t have *perfect* generalization until we reach ASI. Hell, humans have a hard time understanding a new accent for the first time
· ↳ reply to @OldDreyfusard
@OldDreyfusard @MadelineOnMars I don’t think it’s a meaningless argument. I think these are important staircases of thought to descend, because it’s at the intersection of our ideologies that logic frays the most
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @wesleyytian
@wesleyytian tell that to e.g. Middle East factions fighting for power or China annexing SCS territories
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @wesleyytian
@wesleyytian mb but that doesn’t tell the whole story. War is in decline due to mutually assured destruction. This is why US x China x Russia maintain nuclear stockpiles and large standing armies
@CascadianSolo Why so much yang hate? Obv he has no shot at winning, but he’s been running a very techno optimist platform, exactly what we need rn
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@CascadianSolo Every low polling candidate has diehards who think they’re about to knock it out of the park
people who read a ton of pop nonfiction are insufferable. got zero knowledge and a lot of confidence. get real kid, just browse twitter like the rest of us
20 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @balajis
@balajis If you head into any dense area this whole thing is fucked
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @The_Albatross
@The_Albatross @kar_nels @jdcmedlock when my k-12 schools sold supplies they would always be more expensive than Office Depot etc. And I assume they weren’t trying to profit off of me so the procurement must not have been very good
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@The_Albatross @kar_nels @jdcmedlock Free school lunch is probably still good regardless of the waste but most school districts are under a Sodexo monopoly and they’ll charge whatever the hell they want
1 ♥ · x.com →
getting morbid out here ...
17 ♥ · x.com →
me: Nate silver is smug and sometimes unpleasant lol poopoo peepee Some lame nerd: well akshually if u knew what a Bayesian statistic was,
6 ♥ · x.com →
If BLOOMBERG wins Iowa then it’s all over Bloomberg and his heirs will inherit the country for a thousand years of corporate monarchy. The only currency will be Bloomberg subscriptions
46 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@Noahpinion @eade_bengard @ShooterMacGyver and it's not about the aesthetic like you keep saying either. in a lot of ways the idea of a modular grid where individuals own their own solar panels is super appealing to libertarian types. on the flipside, giant nuclear installments are best run by the government
Just cackling madly rn, on the verge of tears
13 ♥ · x.com →
Klobuchar interns dying by the minute. Undergrads being drawn and quartered
79 ♥ · 11 RT · x.com →
This is why nobody trusts government to run anything. They've failed to bug test an app that COUNTS UPWARD
40 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@jdcmedlock what's really ridiculous is that this sort of software procurement is handled by state level party officials instead of bought in bulk nationally and tested by thoroughbreds
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
my lasting opinion from tonight is that the major parties should be run by software engineers :)
6 ♥ · x.com →
In times of chaos we can only trust the markets
14 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
self-replication rules everything around me
1 ♥ · x.com →
CS people are either highly religious or complete atheist rationalist types, there’s no in between
18 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @csuwildcat
@csuwildcat wrong on all points. a king has to face constant threat from his liege lords accumulating too much power, not to mention foreign threats. the ownership of capital & property rights in general are backed by military force
· ↳ reply to @csuwildcat
@csuwildcat there's no doubt that instagram and facebook will be wiped it before long. it's part of the company culture that something better always comes along. but my point is, that if august zuckerberg ever inherited facebook that would be unjust for however long she kept it
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @csuwildcat
@csuwildcat So you’re in the taxation is theft camp? As someone who works on decentralized systems I’m sure you understand coordination problems?
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@csuwildcat (btw I am a red blooded capitalist. I am pointing out a flaw in the usual utilitarian capitalist argument)
wtf is this clown market is Joe Biden really this fucked?
9 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @wannabegroncho
@wannabegroncho yeah there's a bit of both probably. i've become more logical since i started programming but i've always been more logically oriented than average
· ↳ reply to @nmeier21
@NickMeier21 I think it's way early to call that, but I'll admit it's not looking good. I bet this thing goes to a contested convention
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @LukeDashjr
@LukeDashjr it also usually implied that that authority is passed down from God through bloodlines i.e. the pharaohs of egypt being descended from the sun god Ra
· ↳ reply to @LukeDashjr
@LukeDashjr I think it's more a longstanding civilizational archetype than an aspect of any specific society
· ↳ reply to @aquariusacquah
@aquariusacquah it really does seem that the entire support for Bernie stems from the most juvenile populist locus of emotional frustration, more so than anyone else. They literally want this guy to come into office and own their more successful neighbor with taxes or smthng
4 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@aquariusacquah the ethos behind the warren camp is nothing like this despite the economic leftism
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
if u say extremely online i will fight you
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @jdcmedlock
@jdcmedlock “welfare universalism can be hidden anywhere” - the medlock thesis
1 ♥ · x.com →
God please shut up
29 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @eigenrobot
@eigenrobot @wesyang Doesn’t really add up when you take into account the fact that many different kinds of Asian Americans top the charts without ever having known Confucianism. The truth is simpler: the US performs a eugenic brain drain by accepting only the exceptional immigrants
5 ♥ · x.com →
Bernie Sanders is a total loser. In 25 years in US senate he introduced 3 successful bills, 2 of which were to rename post offices. Before he was on taxpayer dime he was a general failson, never held an actual job, and so rose twitter sees a lot of themselves in him
124 ♥ · 14 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
a lot of the more reasonable bernie voters say "he seems like he cares though!" which in politics is about as useful as an anti vax mom who loves her kids a lot. it's a machiavellian death game, not a PBS show.
37 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
you can see the psychological landscape of the bernie voter from how much they hate bernie's exact foil, Mayor Pete. their perfect enemy is the young striver with no different upbringing than their own that's able to be successful while playing the game
30 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
every single complaint is the same - "he's not a fuckup". there are giant accounts who are genuinely saying mayor pete's politics will kill them despite his platform being no more passable than bernie's. they're both for free healthcare and free college
22 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
these people are at war with both exceptionalism and meritocracy because they were judged by those machines and were found lacking
28 ♥ · x.com →
@dickcheneyscou1 I agree that it’s impossible to be good at politics without being some sort of lightweight utilitarian psycho. Which is why sanders shouldn’t be president
1 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
@dickcheneyscou1 This says more about the Vermont electorate than about Bernie Sanders. He lives in a hard blue state and pursued hard blue idealism. There’s never been an ounce of ambiguity he’s had to deal with
4 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @aquariusacquah
@aquariusacquah you’re right that I’m doing the same thing that I’m criticizing. It’s because I’m mad. I’ll try not to. but I disagree that there’s any serious movement building a la Obama. It’s more like moving a handful of lefties moving further left. Justice Dems won like 8/72 districts
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Jebisabigfatmes
@Jebisabigfatmes The challenges are fine. It’s the next part where he accomplished nothing after years and years that’s more important
1 ♥ · x.com →
@rockyavalon co-sponsor means nothing. Some of these bills have 50+ sponsors
@onebuttsenough it's not about me. i'm talking about pete. it's about capable and highly privileged people who spend their early lives not even trying to pursue the typical means of financial success, and then blaming government if it doesn't work out. See the replies: https://x.com/max_read/status/1224823038182612994
1 ♥ · x.com →
Theres no entertainment like PredictIt comments
12 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @NicholasElodeon
@NicholasElodeon UBI better. Say you lose your job right after tax season. You’re fucked. No govt paycheck for you because they’re basing it off of last years income. Better to give biweekly paychecks to everyone and take it back from those who don’t need it in taxes
@SmartArseUSA im deleting my account if any of my shit ever finds its way to brooklyn podcast twitter
@Taylor_Workman @NicholasElodeon the other argument is that universalist policies get mainstream buyin. there's no shame in receiving government paychecks if everyone is getting them
@dickcheneyscou1 AIPAC is a minor lobbying influence compared to other players. I used to think like this in 2016, which is why I voted Sanders, but the reality is that the dems do as good a job as possible balancing the interests their various constituencies.
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@dickcheneyscou1 Jimmy Carter was a good man and a totally useless president. LBJ was by all accounts kind of a dick and managed to pass the most sweeping civil rights reform in generations. you need hardballing pragmatists in office, not feckless idealists
the political theater of Pelosi tearing up the trump speech is literally as old as democracy. its no different than Cato the Elder spilling a bunch of Carthaginian figs in the Roman Senate to convince them to go to war. if you're remarking that it's pointless, you don't get it
21 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
@ironically_edgy anarcho capitalism more or less makes sense e.g. the society described in 'The Moon is a Harsh Mistress'. the problem is that property rights are only protectable with violence, so protection rackets form. they join and grow bigger to seek higher rents. eventually, its a state.
15 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@ironically_edgy anarchic socialism is best described in 'The Culture' but it basically only becomes possible in a post scarcity AI utopian future
8 ♥ · x.com →
voltage is capital and current is labor
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @MenshevikM
@MenshevikM Rooting for someone to fail in the primary is completely different than saying you’re going to sit out the general. The primary is a time to express preferences for where to move the party
8 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
This is actual a form of digital Georgism
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @wannabegroncho
@wannabegroncho @ironically_edgy What we mostly want is dominion over each other. Material wealth is one way to express that desire. If wealth is freely accessible, then we’ll find different ways to play status games. You can already see this with “dematerialization” - we buy fewer material goods every year
· ↳ reply to @wannabegroncho
@wannabegroncho @ironically_edgy If everyone can get a bigger spaceship it’s no longer a flex. If everyone can download a JB simulator, it’s no longer a flex. Etc. highly recommend reading “The Player or Games”
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@bufordsharkley More specifically you can improve both but you can’t move a building to a new parcel fungibly
@AOCummies you have nothing to lose but your chains
6 ♥ · x.com →
@dickcheneyscou1 @inspireprag There no doubt he’s frontrunner . But you gotta consider that the primary voters are more ideologically left than the majority of dems. And what would results look like if there are only two candidates?
dems are running either a gay man or an atheist socialist :')
8 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @aquariusacquah
@aquariusacquah Ah fair enough. Weird, I totally thought he said he was an atheist. Part of the reason I liked him in 2016
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @aquariusacquah
@aquariusacquah I mean I kind of have a sneaking feeling politicos lie about it in public, especially sanders and Obama. Understandable
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@aquariusacquah @kenklippenstein most MAGAs are not nazis, it's just the flirtation with the alt right adjacent information sources like breitbart that i'm saying is similar
This predictit market has had nearly $6 million dollars in trade volume over the past 6 days. tbh kind of impressive
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @aquariusacquah
@aquariusacquah Pete’s floating at 80 cents, so looks like they’re predicting a recount. I sold everything though lol. My heart can only take so many market swings
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @jdcmedlock
@jdcmedlock Looks like the hospital stocks had a major panic for fear of losing Obamacare patients and then recovered after realizing trump wasn’t touching it lol
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @sonyasupposedly
@sonyasupposedly It’s pretty crazy how hard it is to solve this information problem even in the internet age. I wouldn’t have thought it possible to contain a secret this large
3 ♥ · x.com →
I hate the libs for killing Al Franken. He absolutely could've ran in 2020 and won. you need a new york entertainer to counter another new york entertainer
7 ♥ · x.com →
chapos are highly cringe. what is it you think bernie will do for you? cure your existential ennui? save you from the ills of consumerism? give your life meaning? nobody can do those things for you. this is straight up quasi-religious cult-like fervor
91 ♥ · 11 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
the chapo guy here is going mask off and admitting to what liberals have been saying this whole time -- everyone is materially better off due to capitalism. then he goes on to try and fill the hole in his heart where some fulfilling spiritual activity should be with BERNIE
26 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
it's absolutely fucking everywhere. this is disgusting, and really no different than the Trump worship we saw in 2016. he's literally just a milquetoast social democrat. your depression won't be cured after he makes some incremental improvement on our healthcare system
24 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@aquariusacquah my eternal torture is that most of the funniest accounts on this website are diehard bernie or busters
3 ♥ · x.com →
@Jan_Hus_1369 I think the internet has really stepped down our "crowd computing" on some level ... our judgement abilities are becoming worse
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @aquariusacquah
@aquariusacquah yeah agreed ... but i suppose you can't really separate his appeal to young twitter celebs and his appeal to young ppl in general. as far as pete goes, almost all of the heat has to be from big bernie accounts
· ↳ reply to @jdcmedlock
@jdcmedlock i don't know if this is true. my parents and their friends don't like him b/c he isn't a democrat. they're not exactly low info but not twitterbrain either
· ↳ reply to @_Jason_Dean_
@_Jason_Dean_ take like 5 tabs, consult directly with the gods, and come back to us with an answer
4 ♥ · x.com →
@dickcheneyscou1 I really don’t think there’s anyone who’s in fits of ecstasy over Obama or Hillary
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@dickcheneyscou1 i think pretty much anyone with a brain doesn't like what SA is doing in Yemen, even the ex Obama people. once you're in office you become a cynical realist. "the world as it is"
@dickcheneyscou1 there are some really good memoirs from ex Obama staffers that disabused me of the notion that FP would be easy if dems weren't bought out. Highly recommend "The World As It Is" or "The Education of an Idealist". They're genuinely good books by hopeful people
the good thing about having coworkers is that they remind you when the normal human time to have lunch is
10 ♥ · x.com →
@disableist Exactly. It’s all the same shit: the craving for power. At least normal politicians are honest about it
Galvanize and energize not polarize ... kill me, why can’t pete talk like a human
8 ♥ · x.com →
Bernie with some very milquetoast liberal takes tonight
21 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
It’s not typical of “38 year old grade grubber personality types” to make Hail Mary presidential runs
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @vgr
@vgr ? Fashion and architecture are converging in all parts of the world.
Bernie has got typical old man energy. Ignores the question and goes off on his own shit
8 ♥ · x.com →
Tom Steyer spends 90% of his on stage time to shill for Bernie
7 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@jdcmedlock I have to say I love that he just admits Freedom Dividend polled the best. Refreshing
1 ♥ · x.com →
My hottest take is that OPRAH should’ve run. We are well into the era of the celebrity presidency, might as well embrace it now
13 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @NeoLibBen
@NeoLibBen Stop what you’re doing and watch Veep. and Succession for your “high neolib” aesthetics lol
2 ♥ · x.com →
@CascadianSolo @JohnCarltonKing @Noahpinion safer iterations of nuclear plant design come out every year and we make it impossible to test them. bill gates’ nuclear company had been waiting a decade for approvals
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Sharon_Kuruvila
@Sharon_Kuruvila It’s a good question but I think it can be reasonably answered differently based on your moral axioms. e.g. If you’re religious shouldn’t you be teaching the aliens about Christ and saving their souls?
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Sharon_Kuruvila
@Sharon_Kuruvila Sounds to me like Rahner's just punting the question though. If you analyze a planet's culture and find they have no Jesus analogue then you've got work to do as a Christian.
1 ♥ · x.com →
@GerEEEEldo @Sharon_Kuruvila I’ve got no dog in this fight as an atheist but is there a difference between *will not* be saved and *can not*
@GerEEEEldo @Sharon_Kuruvila i mean they're not in any categorically different scenario than indigenous people on earth right? christian missionaries take it upon themselves to convert. in the future you'd send missionary droids to exoplanets :P
· ↳ reply to @jdcmedlock
@jdcmedlock hate his chapo cultists, but I respect bernie. it's more that a nominee signals something about the direction of the party, and it's a direction I'm not a fan of
1 ♥ · x.com →
anybody that claims billionaires are acting in concert to screw everyone else is an idiot and their judgement isn't to be trusted. there's hundreds of them and they're all incessantly trying their damndest to destroy each other.
26 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @antirobust
@antirobust i think if you pick something that basic they're also aligned with most of the people in the country. it's not really an interesting axis
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@antirobust even stuff like "wealth taxes on billionaires" you can find a handful of billionaires to support such a proposal
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @antirobust
@antirobust hmm i'm not sure what you mean. I think prices are *even more* important in SHTF scenarios. good example is when uber turned on surge pricing in a disaster zone and media got mad. without the surge, markets wouldn't have cleared and there wouldn't be enough drivers
1 ♥ · x.com →
@DaanVanDenHam2 The Information Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race
@TankieSanders significant amount. there's a few people i regret pissing off, enough to make me consider making a new account
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@THOTCrime tbh shes above average but standing next to Matt the contrast makes her basically a model
1 ♥ · x.com →
If someone puts PhD in their twitter name there’s a 100% chance they’re too proud of having one and a 90% chance it’s in some field bordering on pseudoscience
191 ♥ · 11 RT · x.com →
@GerEEEEldo It’s the kind of credentialist bullshit that Americans hate. You don’t become a smarter or better person by adding titles to your name. Go back to England if you want to flex titles
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@T_Walt615 nvm lol i just understood what you meant. Nice handle
1 ♥ · x.com →
What if we kissed ... and achieved human to human transmission of 2019-nCov viral pneumonia 😍😍
17 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @XD__MD
@howaryamaan lmfao i'm sure it already exists. someone in my replies better find it
1 ♥ · x.com →
The fact that Bernie Bros hate mayor Pete specifically because he’s smart and ambitious reminds me exactly why I have a natural aversion to big government
34 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
i know the twitter monetization is bad because in my years and years spent on this app i have never once clicked on an ad
37 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
whereas i've not only clicked on IG/FB ads but actually bought stuff from doing so
5 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @ryxcommar
@ryxcommar The left won’t see it that way. If you ask trump supporters whether or not their guy has been a good president, they’ll wholeheartedly say yes regardless of lack of Wall, lack of repealing Obamacare, etc. You can’t fight a cult of personality in a rational way.
5 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@ryxcommar Hate the Sanders campaign for turning even nice account like Lauren’s into total assholes (or maybe showing their true colors?)
· ↳ reply to @ryxcommar
@ryxcommar “We have no confidence in your ability to identify macro political trends!”
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
reminder that pretty much the whole electorate likes it when you're "tough on crime"
3 ♥ · x.com →
@woolie putting it in bio is far more reasonable than making your screen name 'woolie PhD' or something
· ↳ reply to @abhiaaaaagarwal
@abhiprofen it's a classic case of 'deficit virtue signalling' that everyone does before when they're campaigning and immediately forget about when they come into office.
1 ♥ · x.com →
reminder that they call him rat to make fun of his physical appearance e.g. weak chin they'd absolutely be calling him worse if it was 20 years ago
67 ♥ · 5 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @eigenrobot
@eigenrobot akshually the NPV of all future cash flows are priced into the domain,
6 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @sameoldstory
@sameoldstory definitely - their pitch is to trade in the worst band of assholes in American politics for the second worst
10 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
@FrancoLMij it wasn’t apparent to me at first, so i tweeted it
4 ♥ · x.com →
@FrancoLMij making fun of a gay man's appearance on the grounds that it's not masculine enough seems pretty egregious
4 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @jdcmedlock
@jdcmedlock Yes he absolutely should’ve. I think deep down he’s not a social democrat, that’s just the furthest left he can go and be palatable
7 ♥ · x.com →
@garlic_las @FrancoLMij He has no chance of beating trump, I think his cult is full of assholes, and generally don’t like where he’s pulling the party
1 ♥ · x.com →
@accountable_gov lol this is an idiotic argument in favor of *mandatory* national service. it’s illiberal af
1 ♥ · x.com →
I wonder what the highly religious think about neural nets & machine intelligence in general
16 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @alexmschatz
@alexmschatz that’s all fine and good but is it ok to rape or murder a sufficiently powerful machine intelligence?
· ↳ reply to @TokenFredo
@T_Walt615 I feel we’re on the razors edge of having a Butlerian Jihad soon
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @logangraham
@logangraham @benekcj “Lead Clergy AI Expert” I love that our society has developed enough production capacity to maintain esoteric job titles like this
2 ♥ · x.com →
@CascadianSolo Not popular necessarily but takes that reproduce i.e. stuff that induces rage in the opposition
1 ♥ · x.com →
always surprised by super high follower accounts that have zero engagement. there’s way more bots than it appears at first glance
10 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @lastplace1414
@lastplace1414 I think every AI/ML practitioner regardless of what they work on get interested in the field due to the promise of AGI. If you think the true nature of intelligence is ethereal/metaphysical I can see this concept holding less interest
capital and labor’s interests are generally the same. It’s this understanding that makes liberalism tick https://t.co/JzfyqyWq4n
18 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @MaxNighswander
@MaxNighswander @alexmschatz Seems like a risky God of the Gaps type argument. If we invent a thinking machine does that disprove their faith? Would they just consider it not thinking?
· ↳ reply to @hamandcheese
@hamandcheese The Information Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
8 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@MenshevikM universal grammar is good pop science but has completely failed to make any real world prediction
4 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
@dickcheneyscou1 @MenshevikM no one can deny that but his most important ideas haven’t held up over time. universal grammar was soundly disproven
any criticism about candidates being too young or inexperienced always strikes me as a very out of date framing. in the private sector, children rule whole empires from their college dorms
19 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
tired: we should not intervene in iran because we messed up 70 years ago wired: we should intervene in iran to fix the mess we made 70 years ago
14 ♥ · x.com →
Parasite and Joker winning is just more proof that populism will remain dominant for another election cycle
16 ♥ · x.com →
@AOCummies XK-class end of world scenario, prep the bunkers and start stockpiling ammo
3 ♥ · x.com →
matt yglesias really did bend the knee whatever else you want to think about him lol
5 ♥ · x.com →
absolutely clear from the predictit comments who these markets are cheering for and which way you should bet to profit on their bias
6 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @jdcmedlock
@jdcmedlock true, which is why you should follow this logic to the natural conclusion and just give cash :)
6 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@jdcmedlock in seriousness though, is this really controversial? don't conservatives agree? e.g. milton friedman supported UBI over targeted welfare
6 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @jdcmedlock
@jdcmedlock I’ve downloaded the lesson of your header photo and priced it into my models
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @JohnCarltonKing
@JohnCarltonKing @CascadianSolo I frankly don’t give a shit about Pete and I’m here to say this is just lame boilerplate balance the budget rhetoric to attract voters who think of themselves as responsible and will likely result in no actionable results
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@JohnCarltonKing @CascadianSolo Since his main opponent is a progressive it makes perfect sense to try and differentiate himsel. In the general he can blame Republicans
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @danfarina
@danfarina @jdcmedlock this argument doesn't make sense to me. you're telling me you can kind find the political capital to pass M4A but not enough to break the licensing and hospital cartels?
· ↳ reply to @jdcmedlock
@jdcmedlock @THOTCrime folks buy private insurance plans with their cash handout, so you'll end up doing all payor rate setting or some other price control scheme (patent prize). you can also take off many regulatory handcuffs if you can guarantee that people are able to afford basic plans
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@danfarina @jdcmedlock even under a nationalized health insurance system you would want to reform the provider side, unless you want to deal with service shortages.
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@danfarina @jdcmedlock you probably already know this, but the number of medical residencies offered per year in the United States hasn't changed in decades since AMA has a legal monopoly over granting residency spots. we can change this with the stroke of a pen.
· ↳ reply to @danfarina
@danfarina @jdcmedlock first of all I'll say this is a loaded question as no rich country really resembles us. you can't take results from e.g. Sweden and imagine they'll be replicated in the US. second, any example of breaking cartels in any industry applies as a a point of evidence
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@danfarina @jdcmedlock in the EU, you can transfer a medical residency from any country to another. The Swiss system most closely resembles free markets and their provider costs are much lower than ours I believe without rate setting
2 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @jdcmedlock
@jdcmedlock @THOTCrime yeah I agree that UCC is better, was just trying to reason about what a system with just UBI would look like
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@jdcmedlock @THOTCrime btw do you prefer UCC to the obamacare markets? I understand much depends on the specific policy parameters but if we're looking purely at an equivalent amount of budgetary spending
1 ♥ · x.com →
@ironically_edgy i mean yeah it makes perfect sense if you want to go back to the living conditions of the hunter gatherers
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@danfarina @jdcmedlock "The United States has 50 percent fewer practicing physicians per capita than Sweden or Germany." if US doctors are paid twice as much and there's half of them per capita than in similar countries you can imagine how much provider costs can be reduced just with licensing reform
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @danfarina
@danfarina @jdcmedlock Not sure how this comparison holds up. Operating systems aren’t fungible but doctors mostly are. We are facing shortages in all specialties
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @danfarina
@danfarina @jdcmedlock patients don’t pay doctors directly; hospitals or practices do. Those providers demand lower prices with a higher supply of doctors. A level above that insurers shop around for in network and out of network practices. While it’s crude, it does introduce market dynamics
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@danfarina @jdcmedlock the flu shot example is not really salient as it’s uncommon that a procedure covered by insurance has an over the counter alternative
1 ♥ · x.com →
I am mere days away from bending the knee
5 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @JohnCarltonKing
@JohnCarltonKing @CascadianSolo i don't think you've given a good reason why other than "he's too inexperienced", which I absolutely do not care about. it takes a different mindset to solve problems than the one that created them
2 ♥ · x.com →
@AOCummies imagine BLOCKING for this instead of just clicking unfollow
1 ♥ · x.com →
subs are way better than dubs, you absolute animals
29 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
me: I’m a utilitarian and consequentialist also me: reads about politics all day even tho it does nothing for anyone
105 ♥ · 9 RT · x.com →
@dickcheneyscou1 fuck. I’ll have to start writing my explanation of “irony” for the employment courts
4 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @CNLiberalism
@ne0liberal you guys need a dirtbag center podcast with more swearing and cum jokes. I will host it for you 😳
1 ♥ · x.com →
nick mullen: yeah man ... mayor pete .... that shit sucks adam: what if my ballsack was made of denim me, listening: this,,, is genius
69 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @eigenrobot
@eigenrobot there is a vague notion of the virtue of "being informed" so its maybe somewhat better defensible under virtue ethics
1 ♥ · x.com →
this but unironically
31 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
For Bernie to win New Hampshire in a near tie when it’s basically Vermont part 2 is an abysmal showing. I’m taking this as a W for Pete.
54 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @paulcrider
@paulcrider galaxy brain internet commentator: the VP hand picked by the first black president has race issues the black community:
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @covfefe_slonker
@formerlycringe yeah im js he underperformed his polling whereas pete and amy both overperformed by a long shot. NH was supposed to be a Bernie blowout. he should be nervous
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @eigenrobot
@eigenrobot Steve Ballmer looks like hes perpetually coked up but the man is just excited
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @nextarines
@nectarina12 Bernie will execute everyone that didn’t show loyalty early enough, this is just good prax and common sense
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @MenshevikM
@MenshevikM it would have been a strict monotonic increase. You keep your old benefits if they’re better
4 ♥ · x.com →
bernie will publically guillotine everyone who didn't bend the knee before super tuesday js yall better get in line
16 ♥ · x.com →
there are basically two types of twitter accounts 1) wonks who make long analytical threads that explain difficult concepts and reference previous threads of theirs 2) reprehensible shitposters who have never said anything of value im firmly in camp 2
149 ♥ · 9 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @visakanv
@visakanv measure some electronic noise and turn it into a number
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @agraybee
@agraybee That’s how it should work? If the model was expecting one thing and a candidate underperforms, it should correct downward
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@agraybee He didn’t plummet either, just a small dip
1 ♥ · x.com →
high tier cringe. be a capitalist, not a corporatist
8 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @ShepJackson
@TrentWTalley there are many good definitions of corporatism but the functional one I’m using here is the cargo cult worship of corporate window dressing instead of the act of creating value
3 ♥ · x.com →
YEAH OF COURSE I know what a brokered convention is, I watched the Veep finale
9 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @GaluTherizi
@boombutton @MenshevikM which is a good thing. it’s not easy to prove under our system that you have a verified need. those few who’ve already registered for disability are doing fine
· ↳ reply to @jdcmedlock
@jdcmedlock In fairness leftists often lose the ball on the incentives of government bureaucracies to be budget maximizing agents
4 ♥ · x.com →
I thought I was too plugged in, until my mom called me to redpill me on Lev Parnas
11 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
@similaralterity PredictIt contracts predicting how many Trump tweets there will be from date x to date y
4 ♥ · x.com →
there’s nothing wrong with ‘buying your way to the candidacy’ via election ads CMV. a marketing war chest of billions won’t save a trash product. you can’t believe spending your personal fortune on election ads is bad unless you think advertising is itself evil and coercive
6 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
granted i don’t like Bloomberg for other reasons but still
3 ♥ · x.com →
@dickcheneyscou1 like I said if what you’re offering is worse than everyone else you can’t get that much traction — just look at steyer
· ↳ reply to @eigenrobot
@eigenrobot there is a special colosseum for this in DC where they fight to the death
12 ♥ · x.com →
The Ones Who Walk Away From Twitter
10 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@dril_gpt2 also important to note that GPT-2 has essentially read the entire contents of the english internet
8 ♥ · x.com →