@tszzl — page 55/103

2021-09-29 → 2021-10-09 · posts 27001–27500 of 51,350
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
guys my phone autocorrects it to neurips I’m not in control at this point
13 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @alt1na1
@alt1na1 they need to leave the tech apologetics to me
10 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
worth $2.5bn
11 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @garybasin
@garybasin true but even a16z blogpost said nothing of value about what the company actually does at best it’s a services company
5 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Hellachans
@Hellachans absurdly high variance on this one, makes the messaging confusing for sure
6 ♥ · x.com →
I have rotated the shape. Pray I do not rotate it further.
533 ♥ · 22 RT · x.com →
the only contrarian take i need for today
66 ♥ · x.com →
trauma as a lens to analyze personality seems to be completely out of juice
114 ♥ · x.com →
“innovation has slowed due to regulation” ok explain aducanumab
27 ♥ · x.com →
@PomoThug wait but that’s like the opposite of what I’m saying
3 ♥ · x.com →
Sometimes you rotate the shape and sometimes the shape rotates you.
196 ♥ · 8 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @gptbrooke
@gptbrooke true I love to hear from people with genuinely difficult backgrounds and they’re not even traumatized meanwhile normie UMC child #20182 can go off for hours about their trauma
7 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @deepfates
@deepfates kinda cool how compressed our representations of every day things are tho lol
63 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @deepfates
@deepfates unironically just a bag of visual concepts / embeddings and i have to put them together in a good shape via mechanical reasoning
5 ♥ · x.com →
shape rotation as synthetic pretraining for visual reasoning tasks 👁️
49 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @goblinodds
@goblinodds ya but like when I force myself to read as an adult it’s often far more fun than scrooling, just higher activation energy
42 ♥ · x.com →
what i actually did: drew a sphere in matlab what I said I did: “wrote a script to model the plasmonic NP morphologies required for the pre computation”
128 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @b___brian
@bastard_brian yeah but it still works as an example They got FDA approval for some total nonsense
6 ♥ · x.com →
@AshkenaziFugazi a good business does the last 10% of R&D to make a viable product
1 ♥ · x.com →
@_AlastairX_ I understand but if you dig deeper into each of these success stories, which of them was unduly burdened by regulatory hurdles? All of them struggled with real technological problems
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@_AlastairX_ If it was plane with red dots scenario you should be able to point out how these managed to escape
few areas where there’s the most carnage from bad regulation: medical data, housing, nuclear but this rly does not extend into adjacent industries and saying “all innovation in atoms is banned” is cope
119 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
Oh and consumer airlines
26 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @colinmort
@colinmort seems like on biopharma cos are able to sneak in designer drugs of questionable quality past the FDA all the time eg Aduhelm the trial processes are basically reasonable outside of emergencies and the bottleneck doesn’t seem to be paperwork
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@colinmort seemed like every city had Bird scooters almost instantly
@halvorz memorialize the google scholar profile
4 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @nickcammarata
@nickcammarata Agreed but I think it’s a peculiarity of the psychoactives I don’t think that it would rapidly cure cancer for example
4 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@nickcammarata Should be able to apply for a psychoactives license or something
3 ♥ · x.com →
unholy alliance between tech bros and trad chicks
503 ♥ · 9 RT · x.com →
@_AlastairX_ the d2c lobbying came well down the line and it certainly wasnt top of their list for fatal problems imo regulators have been way behind airbnb & uber at every step but i agree it introduces a limitation in that these businesses take very rare personalities to run
· ↳ reply to @zebulgar
@zebulgar except that’s not happening, investors are not letting founders raise employee equity packages, everyone goes and starts their own company
33 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @alth0u
@alth0u If you give me $10m I can make a state of the art walking simulator for my AI
6 ♥ · x.com →
lotta people trapped in a loop where they think they’ll end up doing something interesting if they just talk to enough interesting people lol
665 ♥ · 29 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @nickcammarata
@nickcammarata sounds like you have a good progression / agency then! rather than getting stuck in the loop
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @alt1na1
@alt1na1 Absolutely none of these people will make it
21 ♥ · x.com →
@peachblvd wasting ur time like that is cringe like cmon they knew your qualifications before csuite round table
64 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@peachblvd companies need to get better at cutting off interviews at earlier stages and stop preserving optionality til they die
55 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@peachblvd (similar shit has been happening to me in the past few months)
23 ♥ · x.com →
@peachblvd tbf that’s usually a cop out when they don’t want to explain their real reason , I’ve gotten that too
14 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tautologer
@sinecuris there’s no supply crunch anymore this is just bait for postrats
2 ♥ · x.com →
Senzu beans are just adderall
84 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
the Dune spice is just Diet Coke
68 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
noveau riche losers: CLEAR, TSA Pre-Check ™, Global Entry landed gentry chads: just asks people to be let in front of the line and it works
91 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
@tszzll you lost your focus as soon as you started getting laid NGMI
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @eigenrobot
@eigenrobot there is and will continue to be value in these schools even in tech not to get into faang necessarily but to get into the trading cos or biotech or VC which all tends to be a bit more conservative/ selective
11 ♥ · x.com →
@mahhnav @eigenrobot definitely the prestige carries over but im not sure if the core competencies of doctors translate into biotech
2 ♥ · x.com →
working on your elevator pitch such that it doesn’t look too polished. Like applying “bedhead for men”
93 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
This a16z, is it in the room with us right now?
97 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
they fire you on the spot if you ever make eye contact in big tech. negative signal
85 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@generativist Nobody is going to look at your public roam graph. Otoh you will always get targeted high quality responses on twitter
4 ♥ · x.com →
crypto has somewhat bad energy now but hating crypto has much much worse college Democrat yimby energy
187 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @owl_posting
@abuutyshake im on his side; it’s beyond irrelevant how difficult the research was to the fact that we are and have been creating godlike intelligences for a while
4 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @owl_posting
@abuutyshake forget gpt even Like the google search machine approaches omniscience of human knowledge - you can very comfortably call it godlike esp when you come from a polytheist culture
6 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
anyway I love the quote tweets fecklessly crying “we need to beat up nerds more” to cope with a world they don’t understand anymore
32 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
the only group chat I need is the one with the voices in my head
132 ♥ · 7 RT · x.com →
if I ever paused to think abt the menagerie of impressive people that are following me and the stream of endless bullshit i send into their feeds I would be completely unable to tweet 😂
144 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
there are several econ profs, 2-4 billionaires, a few top AI scientists that will definitely be in the room when *it* happens …
47 ♥ · x.com →
@halvorz wtf is happening with ur Avi halvz
5 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Andr3jH
@andrej_ngmi Eventually you will have too many constraints in your solver and you just stop tweeting. Metaphor for aging
5 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
Eventually you will have too many constraints in your solver and you just stop tweeting. Metaphor for aging
33 ♥ · x.com →
there will be no population decline in the west because we will solve radical life extension 💅💅💅
176 ♥ · 6 RT · x.com →
@hoffsbeefs We can backstop with immigration for quite a while
my understanding is that auton driving trucks on highways is fairly easy — so why do i not see them everywhere
54 ♥ · x.com →
@_AlastairX_ it is an economists job to insist we are already at equilibrium
15 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @leepavelich
@leepavelich @gbrl_dick political systems will adjust to be more inimical to capital just like what’s happening today; redistribution will increase even when people are immortal organizations will not be
7 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @aquariusacquah
@aquariusacquah I think many many people are lowkey turning on autopilot and going to sleep on the highway (within reason bc they gotta press the button) extrapolating from the few data points I have
10 ♥ · x.com →
i still don’t understand how the consultants armed with powerpoints calling linear regressions “AI” managed to psyop everyone into thinking absurd scifi shit is not going on lol
426 ♥ · 26 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
catching some third tier company with a .ai domain name with their pants down and concluding all ML/AI is fake is a helluva local minimum there’s not a single game you can beat computers at any more lol
244 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
ill admit there’s a lot of hubris in computer scientists claiming a lot of things “solved” but there’s another hubris on the other side insisting that the math is too easy or the principle is too simple … inherent belief that human cognition is arcane and too smart to understand
141 ♥ · 5 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @jeff82874662
@jeff82874662 you could launch intra state travel inside california & some of those routes may be lucrative
2 ♥ · x.com →
the blue pill narrative on AI is correct. the intelligence of current tech is unbounded, the xrisk is real people just don’t want yud to be right
298 ♥ · 11 RT · x.com →
what is going on in new york
487 ♥ · 6 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @eigenrobot
@eigenrobot The galaxy is a graveyard of civilizations whose AI cassandras were somewhat irritating
108 ♥ · 6 RT · x.com →
i think the supply chain system collapse catastrophism is faek. am willing to make bets
327 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @bungoman
@bungoman system is self correcting rather than exponential and price signals are robust
39 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Guy_T_Sky
@Guy_T_Sky i dont know but a significant cohort dont like him. i think hes a good writer
20 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @krishnanrohit
@krishnanrohit @gbrl_dick as soon as mfers gotta interact with the real world all pretensions fall apart & your dao is fake controlling an LLC but there’s actuallu people on the board
6 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @gbrl_dick
@gbrl_dick literally any Reddit nerd topic bro this ain’t hard Mfers were discussing their favorite xkcd
95 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
if you own SPY everyone in america is literally working for you
517 ♥ · 18 RT · x.com →
it is kind of absurd that the richest man on earth talks about great filters and roko basilisks lol
301 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
civilization is going well
99 ♥ · x.com →
im literally the quintessential tech bro and i love it
256 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
AI hype train, twitter account, yuppie spending habits, "rationalist" adjacent, randomly say 'theres no alpha left there' , worships elon moosque, learns all philosophy from science fiction, materialist computationalism, metric go up = world gooder https://x.com/ellebeecher/status/1445099616383508485?s=20
135 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
just to start with
30 ♥ · x.com →
he finally did it
517 ♥ · 32 RT · x.com →
can’t believe learning about BGP actually ended up being useful
152 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
every kind of helicopters arriving at datacenters blackops hax0r shit that you can imagine is happening today
56 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
sounds like they spent most of the outage locked out of their own datacenters (cryptographically speaking)
33 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @fogellxy
@mcluvyn I thought so at first but I doubt it Only Facebook can send the command to delete its BGP routes at every border And even internally I doubt anyone has permission to do this on purpose — gotta be a complex failure
11 ♥ · x.com →
on this blessed day i am begging everyone to simply stop coming to overarching conclusions
189 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
i am really seeing both left and right wingers thinking they scored a W against the other side today lmao 🤣
115 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
this has been a fun little chaos monkey and all parties will come out more resilient due to it
29 ♥ · x.com →
conference rooms in most places dont lock so this seems faek at best the room scheduling system will go down moreover even if it were true i beseech the reader to consider how they would handle access permissions for 1000s of conference rooms without digitizing lol https://x.com/kevincollier/status/1445088214172291074
61 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
not to mention at least a few onsite security will have master access to everything
23 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @jeff82874662
@jeff82874662 re: facebook thing ive seen right wingers say that state controlled SM is getting rekt and left wingers saying boomer conservative site is getting rekt
15 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @b___brian
@bastard_brian there are several ok but kinda wrong answers to this question including eg distraction, polarization the topwit answer is that zuck has a punchable face + that movie did trillions of dollars of brand damage in the long run + hes the most free speech hardliner of any of them
111 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
many criticisms of digital security points are reactionary and midwit
23 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
@PomoThug @moultano @bastard_brian lmao i hate to break it to you but people are just browsing memes on there and occasionally talking politics just like this site. you just find it low status
17 ♥ · x.com →
@halvorz think about the incentives in universities vs in a workplace like a million kids (+ the public) trying to get access to lounge in a handful of cushy conference rooms vs abundant conference rooms at work and high tech scheduling systems + gated from public
3 ♥ · x.com →
@halvorz RIP at my uni I remember the nicer newer buildings had digitally booked non locking conference rooms and the older ones had locked card access at any rate all would remain accessible even with no power or network, basic requirement
1 ♥ · x.com →
flynn effect is actually caused by seed oils and microplastics
214 ♥ · 6 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @leaacta
@leaacta true that badges didn’t work for building access tho — however hardly matters bc there is a real lock backup
3 ♥ · x.com →
the hyperreligious are my people because while I may not agree w them we belong to the same tribe (autism)
179 ♥ · 6 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
all are welcome in the Greater Autism Co-Prosperity Sphere
67 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
instead of repealing sec 230 (stupid) why can't fb/etc open up a conduit for various govts to place algorithmic injunctions on posts that it might consider hate speech
69 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
obviously its kind of authoritarian and cringe but it would be far worse if you repeal 230 and the internet platforms have to take down everything mildly suspicious because they stand to hurt their bottom line
36 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @sneaknsneak
@sneaknsneak because politicians (and by extension their PIG voters) cannot coexist with free speech
2 ♥ · x.com →
@mahhnav only WEIRDs could come up with this shit
@TeddyRaccovelt imagine thinking it’s a bad show because it addresses modern neuroses
10 ♥ · x.com →
@halvorz value of autistic hyperfocus increases with time
12 ♥ · x.com →
ted cruz: roon, please repeat to committee what you told my staff me, fb whistleblower: its true senators, one day i came to the microkitchens and they were out of soylent,
141 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Duderichy
@Duderichy you say this but then you don't go out and buy gold chains cuuuuuurious
8 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @micsolana
@micsolana people who blame social media as the root cause for eg trump, 01/06 are essentially npcs and exist on all sides of the spectrum. They would’ve hated Gutenberg too
58 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Duderichy
@Duderichy you say that but you don’t mean it lol you would judge someone for eg blowing their whole fortune in one go on extravagance instead of creating generational wealth
11 ♥ · x.com →
@beamonarch1 @micsolana except you can’t name me a single internet company whose function isn’t to take more of your time by serving you more “interesting” content even subscription based models auto play the next episode so where then was the free will of Facebook?
6 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@beamonarch1 @micsolana if anything due to its monopoly nature they can afford to take great pains to curb content they find to have negative mental effect and downrank “extremist” articles and whatnot
4 ♥ · x.com →
despite the best efforts of the global entertainment industry the most entertaining content is a group chat with like 10 randos on twitter and random indian tiktokkers
183 ♥ · 6 RT · x.com →
Let’s see Paul Allen’s snapchat girl filter
92 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
@lastcontrarian yeah but not for cultural reasons unfortunately the breadth and scope of amateur publishing, interest in physics has only expanded over time
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@lastcontrarian collective intelligence of humanity is simply too low to make the inferential jump to the next level without more data
4 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @The_Meech
@The_Meech @Duderichy lol nah what did you do to deserve your intelligence or your good health or being born in the USA it’s all arbitrary
2 ♥ · x.com →
@lastcontrarian sure, and he may even be right on both fronts: the less data we have the more intelligence it requires to see the truth
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@lastcontrarian on the AI side, that means algorithms with better inductive bias to learn from less data; on the physics side it means we need a bunch of genius physicists looking in the right place
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @pee_zombie
@pee_zombie i think the people who reason from first principles as much as possible at each timestep rather than reasoning from history are at an advantage
13 ♥ · x.com →
Imagine the first guy to hear voices in his head. Competitive advantage over his peers.
279 ♥ · 7 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
imagine you are programming and there’s a bug in the code. too high ego to debug and criticize your own logic. Simple: let the voices take over
61 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @pee_zombie
@pee_zombie Yeah the more cached compute you can delete the better it’s a continuous scale — obviously nobody can start from scratch all the time
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @micsolana
@micsolana just make one gigacarbon sink and we’ll all make pilgrimages to pay our respects
21 ♥ · x.com →
if bill gates wants to put a chip in me I ask “how soon”
131 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @knrd_z
@knrd_z @lndian_Bronson @alth0u i genuinely don’t feel bad automating someone’s job out of existence if welfare exists lol. but even in the general case I don’t care too much
5 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@lisatomic5 in the end nobody will care how he gets there if he’s getting good grades
28 ♥ · x.com →
Logo Daedalus is a top of the line language model trained on 100,000,000 right wing tweets. Output sounds plausible but means nothing
139 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @jasoncrawford
@jasoncrawford @CkLorentzen I mean it’s not heavy hitting or anything but daft punk “technologic”or even “harder better faster” it doesn’t really spell it out but it clearly celebrates the tech ethos
12 ♥ · x.com →
@finnitejest most elegant solution is silently downranking
13 ♥ · x.com →
esoteric technocapitalist
126 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
minor hierophant in the technocapital religious order
27 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
the production function actually answers prayers
21 ♥ · x.com →
right wing conspiracies are always occult and involve worship of demons or foreign gods left wing conspiracies always assume extreme levels of control by intelligence agencies or corporations (men in black)
78 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
technocrat conspiracies always implicate people not understanding their schemes
28 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
all are true 😊
30 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@eigenrobot not fake as in he edited the page but fake as in he did some boomer shit on logged on through a banned vpn
32 ♥ · x.com →
the internet is real and the physical world is fake
305 ♥ · 21 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
I’ve never lived in a time without internet. cybergnosticism is plausible
64 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
the way some people describe spiritual or emotional growth on here sounds more like pathology than progress
159 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
there are people financially dependent on their parents at age 30 lecturing us on how everyone else is emotionally a child
89 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @eigenrobot
@eigenrobot I think in 20C a level of information control was possible that’s simply not available today - this sort of stuff is only for keeping +/- 2 σ normies in line
41 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
2) it understates the evolutionary nature of science -- requires thousands of random searching failures to anoint our 10 geniuses 3) i think people who are far less than astronomical geniuses produced outsized advances in machine learning
186 ♥ · x.com →
this model of science is wrong because it 1) it mistakenly assumes that the 10 geniuses that create scientific revolutions work in a vacuum rather than synthesizing the last 10% of work after accumulating the 90% https://t.co/BvWTPjFIKP
393 ♥ · 23 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
4) the easier way to explain this has less to do with citation dynamics and just that the average quality of research drops as people flock into an up & coming field
115 ♥ · x.com →
i think women actually become unhealthier during mercury retrograde. it might as well be real. hyperstition. few understand
118 ♥ · 6 RT · x.com →
@storebrandguy general consensus was that im morning poster, no one agreed w sigma
6 ♥ · x.com →
@lastcontrarian gotta be this andrew mccallum mf that ive never heard of
13 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Plinz
@Plinz well it's almost tautological that the most important discoveries in a field will be made early -- discover something interesting enough and it will be made into a "new" field early investors get the highest returns
6 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@Plinz but even if this is true it discounts point 2, re: evolutionary nature of science. i suppose math can be somewhat different, depends where you fall on Popper v Kuhn axis
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Plinz
@Plinz right but i'm on the Kuhnian side, saying revolutions can be quite evolutionary in nature, eg punctuated equilibria
3 ♥ · x.com →
ideal future
3,375 ♥ · 262 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @maxhodak_
@max_hodak i think production efficiency will drastically increase vis a vis AI generated assets and that producers will still continue to spend more bc the ROI on intense world building seems unbounded
36 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @costa11235
@costa11235 yeah and fields that are heavier in the empiricism will of course agree with this more than fields that are heavy on theoretical breakthrough
6 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@leaacta do tell the story when u feel comfortable
27 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @gbrl_dick
@gbrl_dick no offense buddy I was looking for any excuse to make this thread for a while
11 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @gbrl_dick
@gbrl_dick no this is actually deep lindy debate Popper vs Kuhn vs Wooton and on and on
11 ♥ · x.com →
there’s a kind of guy in every game (academics, startups, big tech etc) that knows an incredible amount about the metagame but little about the object level thing. they are boring and detestable
643 ♥ · 26 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @cjpberry
@cjpberry this seems somewhat adjacent to great man theory of science - where do you fall on that subject? Do incremental contributions matter?
· ↳ reply to @NLRG_
@NLRG_ autism mfers when they watch the hedgehogs dilemma episode
34 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@SkepticalAlpaca @halvorz anyway I think pundit as a class will become irrelevant as media continues to decentralize we will all be micro pundits for 15 minutes
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@halvorz took this way too seriously now I hate biology
13 ♥ · x.com →
@halvorz that’s indeed how it happened
6 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@halvorz and thus created the new genre of engineering fiction
4 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @parafactual
@parafactual I think no due to efficient market hypothesis lol. the most interesting jobs that also pay well are competed away leaving only the sisyphean drudgeries. some have competitive advantage in enjoying things others find awful
6 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@parafactual however just because there’s no “risk free return” doesn’t mean you can’t find some via being smart & entrepreneurial
4 ♥ · x.com →