@tszzl — page 43/103

2021-07-06 → 2021-07-14 · posts 21001–21500 of 51,350
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
like lambs to the cosmic slaughter!
41 ♥ · x.com →
@bowserbot2 i guess the dispassionate way they talk about the candidate suggests they probably get quite a few that are similarly impressive
18 ♥ · x.com →
when someone is going through your thread and liking tweets you can infer their verbal skill based on the speed of traversal :^)
192 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
just one more thing for you to worry about
74 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@halvorz as far as I can tell everybody who posted on Saturday had perfect verbal reasoning which means the test is sus
9 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@halvorz understanding my verbal vomit is the real challenge
4 ♥ · x.com →
@halvorz yea unfortunately vocab is a pretty g loaded indicator, which sucks for foreigners
4 ♥ · x.com →
@halvorz anecdotally I found the verbal pretty easy and the math somewhat difficult to finish (took it December ‘20) didn’t practice at all so maybe verbal skills are stickier
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @__femb0t
@__femb0t @halvorz @sgodofsk it’s genuinely difficult to understand what you people are saying half the time; requires massive inferential jumps and often quite good theory of mind
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@alth0u the dream: man will merge with machine to become as Gods the reality: man will merge with twitch terms of service
45 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
the twitch terms of service are actually more powerful than many real legal codes
55 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
every revision and update creates and destroys entire worlds
26 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @alth0u
@alth0u like when a new law is passed and there’s a lag before the courts work out the corner cases
5 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
RIP to the hot tub meta. fun while it lasted
27 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @alth0u
@alth0u Federal Reserve forward guidance but for egirls
11 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @notlinear1
@notlinear1 at the risk of my followers calling me a cringe autist, it’s the evolved equilibrium yes. every single successful civilization discovered the ceremony of marriage, it’s clearly effective and Lindy
8 ♥ · x.com →
when you’re ready to make real money. talk to me about shape farming
50 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
we are raising new geometries from hell and getting paid top dollar. sign up for my udemy course
29 ♥ · x.com →
are any of you working at an ML startup right now that is a frontend for a Philippines labeling sweatshop? dm asap I have questions
84 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@owenbroadcast @LudditeHacker I saw a solar eclipse before; it was entirely natural and not supernatural as I’m sure you (might) agree. still awe inspiring and brought tears to my eyes. can you deny its emotional resonance despite irreligion?
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@owenbroadcast @LudditeHacker is the marriage any different? i can get all sappy about it’s virtues without invoking god. i couldn’t get sappy about the contract that seals a home loan. the difference is obvious even if the people in your doc aren’t eloquent enough to find the words
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @retttx
@retttx lol just use the last 7 days man I’m doing a bit
21 ♥ · x.com →
shroomjak is a demon spreading through the noosphere, true. but what they don’t tell you is that there are several morally righteous demons in Hinduism and I’ve just added mr shrigma to the canon
104 ♥ · 5 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
if you understand this tweet you’re fundamentally NGMI
48 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @grantadever
@grantadever bro it’s getting impossible to read my notifs so I check only the mentions tab, which that dumfuk @jack in his infinite ignorance has decided does not include quote tweets
6 ♥ · x.com →
“$x net worth is rich” “not in City Y” ok no enough. this discourse is over. you are all rich compared to my boy The Global Poor
214 ♥ · 9 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @drethelin
@drethelin i mean idk but a good guess is that dating team is optimizing for dating
1 ♥ · x.com →
@lowqualitybot they’re only real when it’s convenient for me, just like god
7 ♥ · x.com →
@darpyu yea neither of my parents had electricity or running water until sometime in their teens
4 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
to be honest im glad to just read one of these that doesnt hinge on "universal simulation is reddit"
21 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @flex_nihilo
@xyz_nihilo all that hoopla to add one line to the editorial guidelines, which they clearly ignore anyway
· ↳ reply to @alth0u
@alth0u mfw all of conscious experience is just my body gaslighting me
29 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@alth0u only the p zombies are enlightened
21 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @alth0u
@alth0u Even without your participation, all the warriors gathered here will die. Therefore, arise, Arjuna; conquer your enemies and enjoy the glory of sovereignty. I have already slain all these warriors; you will only be my instrument. B.G. 11:34
9 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @PradyuPrasad
@PradyuPrasad trapped in innovators dilemma - double down on maintenance or try new things and risk it collapsing
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @alth0u
@alth0u probably not worth doing anything derisked to this degree
7 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@alth0u in my mind once you assemble the architecture of some software project (with high belief that it’ll work) actually doing it becomes pointless
11 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @jeff82874662
@jeff82874662 this is effective propaganda because it’ll ring true to most countries facing shortages while us vax rates already plateaud from vax hesitance
15 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @ivashko
@ivashko @alth0u true, management risk becomes key. anyway probably good reason to start a company so you can skip several steps on management
5 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @BulbIndustry
@brawnyman713 @jeff82874662 but realistically nobody expects the Chinese to come through as their savior — they do expect their benign economic-imperial rulers to save them though
5 ♥ · x.com →
by onion futures they meant this
24 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @eigenrobot
@eigenrobot yea bearish on the ability of charter schools to create miracle growth
8 ♥ · x.com →
@fatcat12321 congrats dumbass you just ceded them most of Creation
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
I remember at a McDonald’s I went to in India they had a guy who would listen to your order and then manually enter it himself into the self-checkout kiosk lol. Many automations only make sense in high wage labor regimes
60 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @notlinear1
@notlinear1 yeah I don’t know what the social effects are but it seems like the usg has figured out a way to give UBIs without really calling it that
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @btbytes
@btbytes wouldn’t the elites in India know English? Or why not include a language menu?
· ↳ reply to @carrr_losss
@carrr_losss you misunderstand the point if all labor is more expensive, then more things become feasible/necessary to automate
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @generativist
@generativist of course. we can't be abandoning our visual intuitions for the sake of algebraic notation sophistry
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @lalaAlicelala
@lalaAlicelala yea me too but then you reread the book and its about how much the military ruined his life by sending him to school in orbit
5 ♥ · x.com →
tfw coworker catches you with leetcode open 😳
94 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @alth0u
@alth0u bespoke: doing this on purpose as a form of career negging
31 ♥ · x.com →
at the level of a handful of people organizing and managing a team effectively is mostly an empathy oriented task. at the large scale it becomes mechanistic again and a certain kind of meat computer autist tends to win. many struggling with these disparities of scale
49 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @LucioMM1
@LucioMM1 the best executives seem to manage a spreadsheet in their mind for the technical & financial ROI of whole departments to create & destroy at will. they need to have a great hiring ability, yes, but empathy doesn't seem as important
5 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@LucioMM1 in short the direct reports of C level officers are not as fragile / do not require as much care as normies
4 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @R1Jack
@R1Jack p much. big company was a big mistake
2 ♥ · x.com →
extremely jealous of hedgehog thinkers
57 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
imagine believing in anything strongly
40 ♥ · x.com →
@halvorz foxes are mostly just good at pedantry on twitter
4 ♥ · x.com →
everybody wants to be an "expert generalist", nobody's good enough at doing it
207 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
this tweet is about sonic mains vs fox mains
29 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@lisatomic5 and yet there seem to be quite a few absolutely pivotal expert generalists out there rn
4 ♥ · x.com →
@nicholatian it’s not about becoming omniscient more like holding enough disparate info in one head to make novel synthesis and good decision making
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@nicholatian rarely possible when a person has a skin deep understanding of 20 subjects, otherwise every high schooler would be changing the world
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @MaiqTL
@MaiqTL yea I’m not saying I’m some sort of twitter genius, I just have a visceral sense that this place matches my cognition. the frenetic pace, the jumping around, the eclectic references
23 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@MaiqTL essentially it’s breadth of knowledge for the sake of making great dinner party convo rather than for some kind of utility
21 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @arctanno
@arctanno I did, it’s pretty fun but generally the recipe is not that coherent
3 ♥ · x.com →
@nicholatian @reconfigurthing I don’t see why simulation argument would have to rule out some religion — might just be that Creation was more complex and bigger than once thought. I mean did heliocentrism or the Hubble Deepfield kill god
31 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
there are only 3 real expert generalists: - Tyler Cowen - Johnny von Neumann - elon
38 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @reconfigurthing
@reconfigurthing @nicholatian And I think while the argument may cross into metaphysics it doesn’t necessarily have to — there would be testable consequences of a universal simulation
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @MaiqTL
@MaiqTL interpret that last tweet as a shitpost
3 ♥ · x.com →
absolutely nothing that makes me dismiss a take as quick as if it mentions “using your right brain” or whatever
145 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @glockwitdanuts
@glockwitdanuts it boosted their user numbers by quite a bit and then they got a slap on the wrist fine from the regulators
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@Higgs__Field its more like, my brain is incredibly bad at focusing on work and even what i have accomplished is via a series of self-medicated copes. whereas it is naturally attuned to the frenetic pace of reading and writing on twitter
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @eigenrobot
@eigenrobot i see what you mean yeah fair enough. global poverty is infohazard
9 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @rbranson
@rbranson hmmm you mean spacex will be talent-sucked into spending all their time maintaining starlink?
· ↳ reply to @GuilleAngeris
@GuilleAngeris you gotta admit your hearts gotta jump a bit when you read the phrase "crypto synthetic assets"
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @rbranson
@rbranson i guess it's an open question whether even with perfect information there remain topologies that will always be unprofitable for ISPs to serve and very profitable for starlink to serve
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@rbranson (remain enough* topologies for the venture to be worth it tbc)
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @BarneyFlames
@BarneyFlames yea and its apparently not even the literal poorest parts of the country. so less than -1 SD seems .. fine? obviously still sucks if it turns out to be preventable brain damage from anemia
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@sonyasupposedly @shlevy like if you look at many of the older polytheistic mythologies they often present the gods as players on an eternal stage and nobody knows how it got there — hinduism is like that
3 ♥ · x.com →
The utility created by using debug strings like “poopoopeepee” is incalculable
133 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @shlevy
@shlevy perhaps but this kind of verbal trickery is hardly satisfying — even a child can wonder why does all this shit exist
5 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@shlevy I’ve heard the anthropic arguments and the “why is nothing privileged over something” argument and of course the god argument, but none of it satisfies the itch of the underlying curiosity
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @sonyasupposedly
@sonyasupposedly @shlevy Yea sorry to be more specific, the Brahman is supposed to be eternal, but brahman is taken to be an impersonal force (nobody prays to the brahman itself) so I’m not sure it’s the same thing
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Plinz
@Plinz using a weak definition of “materialism”
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Plinz
@Plinz my weak definition being “not religion” whereas the strong definition being “nothing more exists than matter and it’s governing laws”
love it when there are massive reorgs and then the operational metrics for your team don’t even change. the half year reorg is like the fake software project you create and destroy to get a promotion except at the director level
75 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @alth0u
@alth0u what do you mean by upward management
3 ♥ · x.com →
@finnitejest sorry finn i don't have a good knowledge of the Outpost Colonies
2 ♥ · x.com →
as a habitual contrarian, extremely torn about simulation theory bc many a house party in sf is full of ppl who take it somewhat too seriously but then my whole twitter feed reflexively just calls it cringe scientism
103 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@bronzebarbarian i tell everyone how stupid it is irl and then sing its praises online
11 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Andr3jH
@andrej_haulis the thing is it is absolutely not a religious belief structure and to call it that would be to degrade religion lol it's a theory of cosmogony that doesn't actually offer purpose/validation/salvation/any of those things like "hey your grandpa lived and died in a fake universe"
6 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@andrej_haulis strawman: its not wish fulfillment enough steelman: its not beautiful enough
2 ♥ · x.com →
i didnt feel any earthquake therefore its a psyop
27 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Andr3jH
@andrej_haulis hmm but its not clear that the creator would be almighty at all -- after all theres no point in running a simulation if you're omniscient and already know what's gonna happen
1 ♥ · x.com →
deleted lindy
242 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @BecomingCritter
@BecomingCritter yeah I’m also uninterested if it’s pure metaphysics / nontestable but it feels like it might be testable
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @pee_zombie
@pee_zombie still don’t get the inner demons thing but maybe I will at any rate the weird thing is that there are no aliens
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @BecomingCritter
@BecomingCritter well potentially we could use this info to hack/ mess with our own sim or try to manipulate the sim runners or something. it’s hard to know the utility of knowledge before you have it. what you personally do if you knew the corona was a lab leak?
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @LudditeHacker
@LudditeHacker the difference is that I don’t think this is a metaphysical thought experiment. I have a strong hunch it would have physical consequences
· ↳ reply to @LudditeHacker
@LudditeHacker yeah I’m not thinking of a Cartesian demon — I’m thinking about a regular physical universe inside a computer. what special properties would it have?
@0x543211 bro it doesn’t matter tho bostrom didn’t try and answer every of life’s questions incl ultimate origins
· ↳ reply to @zcknln
@zcknln @pee_zombie lmao at any rate. twitter is far more hyperreal and bizarre than sf will ever be
2 ♥ · x.com →
@0x543211 i mean idk none of this is satisfying. the idea that the earth is not the center of the universe is unsatisfying
· ↳ reply to @alth0u
@alth0u software margins are better than ML margins thats all
5 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@alth0u it doesnt even have to be that the original chatbot business was a grift -- just a classic example of innovator's dilemma'ing yourself. make a high margin product on the pathway to making a much more interesting low margin product
5 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @alth0u
@alth0u but i also can't rule out bubble / the real AI application will never appear / etc
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@alth0u the moment Starlink goes public mars is doomed honestly. they will just get innovator's dilemma'd to fuck
4 ♥ · x.com →
this and all similar images should send chills down your spine. if you see this in a powerpoint you are about to get robbed blind
377 ♥ · 16 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @alth0u
@alth0u somehow make a zero sum economy out of this and you have an interesting concept
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @BarneyFlames
@BarneyFlames @alth0u realistically, i don't see why you would need multiple D's or in this setting. just train one big one that takes extra inputs to disambiguate the "mode". bet you could do about as well, just have to make the model larger
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @alth0u
@alth0u yea there was an interesting paper that nips last year that generalized alphastar league as an example of a zero sum loss game, i'll see if i can find it
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @alth0u
@alth0u @BarneyFlames notably i see that they only compared vs pairwise trained CycleGANs and such. 1) less cynical possibility is that training a single discriminator for all datasets is unstable / doesn't work that well 2) cynical is that 1G:1D just would not be 'novel' enough to get published
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@guavault ok the real one is cultural/memetic evolution
40 ♥ · x.com →
@chaosprime we’re just not measuring goodly enough yet :)
9 ♥ · x.com →
worst part of any project is searching for the tools to do the job and continue googling in the hopes that something even better and more specialized exists
74 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @kyzcralotSxaM
@kyzcralotSxaM one time i started thinkin abt operating systems and it fucked me up programs running other programs broh
9 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @NathanielLugh
@NathanielLugh @MatiosTV i can tell you something unsatisfactory like "yea its called samsara" but i think no in that the telos suggested by sim theory is entertainment / science experiment
13 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@NathanielLugh @MatiosTV however the suggested mechanism of action would change through the ages: clockwork, steampunk, industrial machinery, electronics, computers, quantum computers, etc
11 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
@samson_hu my big co is pretty open about technical QA
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @alth0u
@alth0u gotta somehow asterisk that I got it for free
38 ♥ · x.com →
@finnitejest the values of the producer are somewhat different than the values of the consumer
4 ♥ · x.com →
you say you’re a “postrationalist” but you don’t ape tens of thousands into random stonks based on good vibes only
91 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
@finnitejest you don’t think that the American puritans looked down on profligate spending, gambling, drinking, etc?
4 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
emh / I can buy only s&p is high modernism!!
13 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @garybasin
@garybasin least of your worries if you have an intelligence that powerful
4 ♥ · x.com →
@shaispiegel93 bro insights dont always have to be novel, sometimes you just forget and remember things
1 ♥ · x.com →
everyone log off. that's an order
93 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
sidenote: if you believe sim2real you have to become a tesla bear of sorts. the data moat isn't tenable if you can generate a bunch of productive, but lower quality in-simulo data
43 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @dataghees
@dataghees sim2real** is training in simulo and testing in real world , yeah
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Willyintheworld
@Willyintheworld yeah, although it seems like from first principles simulating really wacky stuff that won't ever actually happen irl is viable with sims. like what happens if there's an elephant on the road? we can find out by simulating!
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Willyintheworld
@Willyintheworld the latter is likely easier than the former. we can tune the friction constants willy nilly with a sophisticated friction simulator. whereas creating new art and such for the deer is difficult
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Willyintheworld
@Willyintheworld lmao tru. tesla brain will be so used to navigating hellscapes in simulo that it's positively happy to drive on US-80
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Nexuist
@Nexuist not really, you don't need it to simulate shakespeares brain generating Hamlet, you need it to simulate his sheeplike leminglike crowd behavior driving thru the streets interacting with fast moving objects
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @NLRG_
@NLRG_ reinforcement learning -- algorithms that learn via trial and error
2 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @rkarmani
@rkarmani the author mentions the robot they purchased somewhere in his thread
2 ♥ · x.com →
the three body problem guy joined as a “scifi director” at an AI startup that sells uyghur recognition programs to the Chinese government lmao
587 ♥ · 37 RT · x.com →
@Nazaaakat @peachblvd men can only rotate shapes in situations where it offers no practical value
9 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @jachaseyoung
@jachaseyoung @_O_Null_ true but supporting the internment is probably the normie chinese opinion, would be strange if the author didn't toe the party line there. more interesting that he is actively involved
38 ♥ · x.com →
@djmicrobeads having a hype guy is not a bad idea, like Catherine having a resident philosopher
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
stop comparing him with orson scott card nerds saying some mean things about LGBT is not comparable to abetting internment camps lol
131 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @BarneyFlames
@BarneyFlames true. would be eternally loyal at any company that keeps greg egan or ted chiang on retainer
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @notlinear1
@notlinear1 agreed i don't feel strongly about this but notably blue checks who believe the normie narrative QTing and comparing to OSC
5 ♥ · x.com →
@HgTrismegistus @oppositenames this is fair but i don't believe in the ideology of "only x,y,z slice of the population can comment on the struggles of x,y,z". i wouldn't try to speak over a gay person on this matter, but neither would i hold my tongue on something obvious just because i'm not gay
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
disclaimer: it doesnt actually mean much that there are research teams at google and nvidia (each of which employs hundreds of researchers) experimenting with AI chip design. but ive seem some awesome sim2real papers in the area so i'm simping
26 ♥ · x.com →
@halvorz lmao yeah, take this one "seriously but not literally". im just cackling at the yudkowsky-hanson infighting going strong
4 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @eigenrobot
@eigenrobot most scientific and technological progress is made this way the long tail
52 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@eigenrobot dare i say "political progress" may be different tho if we can permit some whig history altho i keep seeing things about how young the american revolutionaries were
17 ♥ · x.com →
@ollyrobot want to rt this so bad but am coward
6 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @postpostpostr
@postpostpostr @eigenrobot i dunno feel free to prove me wrong via an exhaustive accounting of all famous scientific papers and theirs authors ages, seems liek 2 much work
3 ♥ · x.com →
@kristineCreates basically reinforcement learning AIs training for hundreds of realtime years in simulation dojos and then being tested in the real world since its so hard to gather real world data
1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @GuilleAngeris
@GuilleAngeris true lol. better heuristics replace worse heuristics. anyway do you have a read on how impactful this is? google published some eye popping results but it was for a toy environment
5 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@eigenrobot @LudditeHacker the steelman is more like in areas where new ideas are more important than conservation should take young ppl seriously (science, tech, business, etc). the bright side of all those areas is that nobody can fuck around and become an accidental Maoist in charge of shit that matters
17 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@eigenrobot @LudditeHacker you have to earn your keep by eg providing better products and services or writing papers that people want to read or things like that letting thousands of high variance flowers bloom works when the superstructure is bound by some kind of darwinian fitness
22 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@eigenrobot @LudditeHacker in short thesis would be: young ppl prolly have worse ideas on average, but higher variance in that the outliers will b quite important
21 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @GuilleAngeris
@GuilleAngeris why? RL would be the right approach due to the discrete action space and can't get rewards til the end
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @GuilleAngeris
@GuilleAngeris lol big if true. will read more later but thats a higher level of grifting than i would've expected if they're trying to RL optimize convex opt problems
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @GuilleAngeris
@GuilleAngeris @DogIsABot seems hard to believe that nvidia and intel, some of the largest companies in the world, aren't doing all they can to optimize routing & placement with modern optimization methods. wish google could compare with, say, the state of the art internal tool at nvidia
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@halvorz and to be fair, what we know of transformer models suggests that indefinite scaling is real https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.08361 can't easily translate those claims to bio brains tho obv nor more holistic intelligence criteria than "test set accuracy"
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @isaac_lewis
@isaac_lewis correct on all counts, but its still neat how far modern AI optimization has come. to the level where it's infecting the chips that run it
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @ded_ruckus
@ded_ruckus yes agreed, but if simple layout changes work you allow incremental improvement without retooling the fabs. eg if you can somehow gain 5% power efficiencies here and there just by moving around nanowires w.o needing totally new fab techs that's a nice and cheap win
10 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@ded_ruckus layout optimization would never get you a step size improvement, gotta look to the fundamental physics and engineering of fabs for that. even still, chip companies keep moore's law going via micro optimizations at every layer of design
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@alth0u @ded_ruckus i can also say that inside {BigTechCo} theres a whole group actively looking into rl 4 compiler opt
8 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @WhiteBoyTheory
@SigmaNick dont do anything fancy, just go OMAD (one meal a day). easiest diet in the world
6 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @MahmetTokarev
@MahmetTokarev i would be very surprised em is scifi technology -- we are not anywhere close to brain scanning i can clearly see the onramp from here to general intelligence
5 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@SigmaNick 1000 calorie deficit a day is p manageable for like a month
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@ollyrobot the esoteric reading is of a country that made a faustian bargain with the technocapital gods
13 ♥ · x.com →
i ghostwrote this book
81 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
v2
149 ♥ · 7 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @djcentos6
@djcentos6 they shouldve given that mf a computer in jail (and pray he doesnt smash it to pieces)
2 ♥ · x.com →
a piece of software has truly Made It once ppl start building accelerator chips for it
91 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @TurboRational
@TurboRational slack is built on electron eg javascript v8 engine & chromium and i'm sure many modern SoCs like M1 are benchmarked on browser performance and such
13 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @GuilleAngeris
@GuilleAngeris they seem to at least have implicitly optimized for the number of chrome tabs you can open lol
3 ♥ · x.com →
@Teleonomic idk doesnt this suggest we can cut like 35 gigatons of co2 based on just renewables transition?
2 ♥ · x.com →
@Teleonomic sure steel requires carbon inputs, but again not a huge chunk of the pie surely we'll always neutralize some amount via CCS
1 ♥ · x.com →
@Teleonomic yeah i understand -- carbon inputs for heating blast furnaces and such but iirc this is like <5% of total carbon emissions
2 ♥ · x.com →
@ollyrobot could be wrong but i thought they lowered the albedo of all starlinks after the complaints came in?
5 ♥ · x.com →
@ollyrobot yeah erasing them is impossible but making them dark enough such that they don't overexpose astrophotography
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@ollyrobot and i think they're invisible to the naked eye even before they lowered the albedo
2 ♥ · x.com →
@halvorz @edmundrollett so its not the symptoms themselves (coughing, sneezing, etc) that make ppl more infectious?
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@__femb0t @GuilleAngeris "yeah i use the CLOSURE TRANSPILER to reduce my PACKAGE SIZES" - statements dreamed up by the utterly deranged
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@ollyrobot so my read is that the current starlinks at their terminal orbit are at like +5.5 mag brightness where +6 is roughly invisible to the naked eye in a dark field so yeah you will see this things in the darkness but they will be dim
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@ollyrobot and if/when they add these DarkSat things (which amount to basically black hubcaps) it will go past +6 to be invisible in dark sites and the operational time of a starlink is like 2-3 years so if they launch the new program all bad sats should be outta the sky asap
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@ollyrobot but of course its valid to wonder if spacex will actually follow through on using the darker sats if it adds cost and eats into their margins. my read is probably yes so that at the least they dont get into trouble with any governments but could be wrong. can see the concern
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@ollyrobot sorry to spam your replies with nerd bullshit im on stimulant fueled bender rn https://arxiv.org/pdf/2101.00374.pdf looks like the biggest problem is that there are outlier observations sometimes when the sat catches the light wrong and becomes pretty bright
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @wowholyfucking
@wowholyfucking yeah i mean forget the astronomers but i can understand complaints if there are 50,000 sats ruining everyone's naked view of the night sky
4 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @ThatsMauvelous
@ThatsMauvelous cautiously taking my rt back bc some of my followers will consider this crass materialism but its tru and i dont think its a bad thing. need more natural MDMA plugs
4 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @gbrl_dick
@gbrl_dick i think its like an early cycle in innovation curves marginally adding a computer + touch screen makes most products worse but is a necessary local minimum before shit becomes cool
5 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@gbrl_dick at first they were making smart fridges that were doing fuck all like twitter for samsung smart fridge or see what items are already inside the fridge among other stupid shit but now they're doing like predictive processing of what produce you're gonna need and auto ordering it
4 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@gbrl_dick lot of the IoT discourse among tech ppl is classic disillusionment stuff, lack of imagination, etc
6 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @gbrl_dick
@gbrl_dick yeah fr many things should have either (1) a frontend that is an app on your phone (2) voice UX rather than creating permanent liabilities to write frontend software for fridge touchscreens that nobody will want to work on after like 2 yrs
6 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@parafactual ive already prestiged and now playing Challenge mode
14 ♥ · x.com →
@halvorz ya this is the only one that pisses me off usually in these debates the effect sizes are trivial and study results are uncertain it won’t matter either
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Hellachans
@Hellachans Google glass was the last time a reasonable person could be hopeful about the future.
13 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@notlinear1 to be honest the worst kind of SWE is not “product first” or “tech first” but like “process first” gotta write a design doc before they wipe their ass
15 ♥ · x.com →
the world if the Power Structures of Harvard hadn’t Burried Eric’s Work
117 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @alt1na1
@alt1na1 wait I wish my college dorm was like this though
6 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
Pessimists get to sound smart. Optimists get to make money. Me and @ori_living are going the moon and the rest of you are NGMI
20 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @GuilleAngeris
@GuilleAngeris @eigenrobot @houellebecq_2 I dunno I just seem to meet an absurd concentration of interesting people here, especially off of twitter everyone has their own project going in the background that they’re willing to pitch at a moments notice and finally I just like going to work in a high rise
4 ♥ · x.com →
most suspicious command line tool is jq
68 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →