@halvorz anecdotally I found the verbal pretty easy and the math somewhat difficult to finish (took it December ‘20)
didn’t practice at all so maybe verbal skills are stickier
@__femb0t@halvorz@sgodofsk it’s genuinely difficult to understand what you people are saying half the time; requires massive inferential jumps and often quite good theory of mind
@notlinear1 at the risk of my followers calling me a cringe autist, it’s the evolved equilibrium yes. every single successful civilization discovered the ceremony of marriage, it’s clearly effective and Lindy
@owenbroadcast@LudditeHacker i mean i firmly reject your dichotomy of mundane vs supraphysical but i don’t think it’s a productive disagreement so w.e.
@owenbroadcast@LudditeHacker I saw a solar eclipse before; it was entirely natural and not supernatural as I’m sure you (might) agree. still awe inspiring and brought tears to my eyes. can you deny its emotional resonance despite irreligion?
@owenbroadcast@LudditeHacker is the marriage any different? i can get all sappy about it’s virtues without invoking god. i couldn’t get sappy about the contract that seals a home loan. the difference is obvious even if the people in your doc aren’t eloquent enough to find the words
shroomjak is a demon spreading through the noosphere, true. but what they don’t tell you is that there are several morally righteous demons in Hinduism and I’ve just added mr shrigma to the canon
@grantadever bro it’s getting impossible to read my notifs so I check only the mentions tab, which that dumfuk @jack in his infinite ignorance has decided does not include quote tweets
@alth0u Even without your participation, all the warriors gathered here will die. Therefore, arise, Arjuna; conquer your enemies and enjoy the glory of sovereignty. I have already slain all these warriors; you will only be my instrument.
B.G. 11:34
@jeff82874662 this is effective propaganda because it’ll ring true to most countries facing shortages while us vax rates already plateaud from vax hesitance
@brawnyman713@jeff82874662 but realistically nobody expects the Chinese to come through as their savior — they do expect their benign economic-imperial rulers to save them though
I remember at a McDonald’s I went to in India they had a guy who would listen to your order and then manually enter it himself into the self-checkout kiosk lol. Many automations only make sense in high wage labor regimes
at the level of a handful of people organizing and managing a team effectively is mostly an empathy oriented task. at the large scale it becomes mechanistic again and a certain kind of meat computer autist tends to win. many struggling with these disparities of scale
@LucioMM1 the best executives seem to manage a spreadsheet in their mind for the technical & financial ROI of whole departments to create & destroy at will. they need to have a great hiring ability, yes, but empathy doesn't seem as important
@MaiqTL yea I’m not saying I’m some sort of twitter genius, I just have a visceral sense that this place matches my cognition. the frenetic pace, the jumping around, the eclectic references
@nicholatian@reconfigurthing I don’t see why simulation argument would have to rule out some religion — might just be that Creation was more complex and bigger than once thought. I mean did heliocentrism or the Hubble Deepfield kill god
@reconfigurthing@nicholatian And I think while the argument may cross into metaphysics it doesn’t necessarily have to — there would be testable consequences of a universal simulation
@Higgs__Field its more like, my brain is incredibly bad at focusing on work and even what i have accomplished is via a series of self-medicated copes. whereas it is naturally attuned to the frenetic pace of reading and writing on twitter
@rbranson i guess it's an open question whether even with perfect information there remain topologies that will always be unprofitable for ISPs to serve and very profitable for starlink to serve
@moritheil@RahmSJ@eigenrobot yeah i simply don't think this is easily avoidable, considering all they do to augment the rice supply with vital nutrients
@BarneyFlames yea and its apparently not even the literal poorest parts of the country. so less than -1 SD seems .. fine? obviously still sucks if it turns out to be preventable brain damage from anemia
@sonyasupposedly@shlevy like if you look at many of the older polytheistic mythologies they often present the gods as players on an eternal stage and nobody knows how it got there — hinduism is like that
@shlevy I’ve heard the anthropic arguments and the “why is nothing privileged over something” argument and of course the god argument, but none of it satisfies the itch of the underlying curiosity
@sonyasupposedly@shlevy Yea sorry to be more specific, the Brahman is supposed to be eternal, but brahman is taken to be an impersonal force (nobody prays to the brahman itself) so I’m not sure it’s the same thing
love it when there are massive reorgs and then the operational metrics for your team don’t even change. the half year reorg is like the fake software project you create and destroy to get a promotion except at the director level
as a habitual contrarian, extremely torn about simulation theory bc many a house party in sf is full of ppl who take it somewhat too seriously but then my whole twitter feed reflexively just calls it cringe scientism
@andrej_haulis the thing is it is absolutely not a religious belief structure and to call it that would be to degrade religion lol
it's a theory of cosmogony that doesn't actually offer purpose/validation/salvation/any of those things
like "hey your grandpa lived and died in a fake universe"
@andrej_haulis hmm but its not clear that the creator would be almighty at all -- after all theres no point in running a simulation if you're omniscient and already know what's gonna happen
@BecomingCritter well potentially we could use this info to hack/ mess with our own sim
or try to manipulate the sim runners
or something. it’s hard to know the utility of knowledge before you have it. what you personally do if you knew the corona was a lab leak?
@LudditeHacker the difference is that I don’t think this is a metaphysical thought experiment. I have a strong hunch it would have physical consequences
@LudditeHacker yeah I’m not thinking of a Cartesian demon — I’m thinking about a regular physical universe inside a computer. what special properties would it have?
@alth0u it doesnt even have to be that the original chatbot business was a grift -- just a classic example of innovator's dilemma'ing yourself. make a high margin product on the pathway to making a much more interesting low margin product
@BarneyFlames@alth0u realistically, i don't see why you would need multiple D's or in this setting. just train one big one that takes extra inputs to disambiguate the "mode". bet you could do about as well, just have to make the model larger
@alth0u yea there was an interesting paper that nips last year that generalized alphastar league as an example of a zero sum loss game, i'll see if i can find it
@alth0u@BarneyFlames notably i see that they only compared vs pairwise trained CycleGANs and such.
1) less cynical possibility is that training a single discriminator for all datasets is unstable / doesn't work that well
2) cynical is that 1G:1D just would not be 'novel' enough to get published
worst part of any project is searching for the tools to do the job and continue googling in the hopes that something even better and more specialized exists
@NathanielLugh@MatiosTV i can tell you something unsatisfactory like "yea its called samsara" but i think no in that the telos suggested by sim theory is entertainment / science experiment
@NathanielLugh@MatiosTV however the suggested mechanism of action would change through the ages: clockwork, steampunk, industrial machinery, electronics, computers, quantum computers, etc
a huge W for sim2real transfer. i remain extremely bullish on sim2real based AI robotics. if anyone knows of any startups working on this outside of pure research lmk https://x.com/AIatMeta/status/1413468328937639937
sidenote: if you believe sim2real you have to become a tesla bear of sorts. the data moat isn't tenable if you can generate a bunch of productive, but lower quality in-simulo data
@Willyintheworld yeah, although it seems like from first principles simulating really wacky stuff that won't ever actually happen irl is viable with sims. like what happens if there's an elephant on the road? we can find out by simulating!
@Willyintheworld the latter is likely easier than the former. we can tune the friction constants willy nilly with a sophisticated friction simulator. whereas creating new art and such for the deer is difficult
@Nexuist not really, you don't need it to simulate shakespeares brain generating Hamlet, you need it to simulate his sheeplike leminglike crowd behavior driving thru the streets interacting with fast moving objects
@jachaseyoung@_O_Null_ true but supporting the internment is probably the normie chinese opinion, would be strange if the author didn't toe the party line there. more interesting that he is actively involved
@HgTrismegistus@oppositenames this is fair but i don't believe in the ideology of "only x,y,z slice of the population can comment on the struggles of x,y,z". i wouldn't try to speak over a gay person on this matter, but neither would i hold my tongue on something obvious just because i'm not gay
disclaimer: it doesnt actually mean much that there are research teams at google and nvidia (each of which employs hundreds of researchers) experimenting with AI chip design. but ive seem some awesome sim2real papers in the area so i'm simping
@eigenrobot dare i say "political progress" may be different tho if we can permit some whig history
altho i keep seeing things about how young the american revolutionaries were
@postpostpostr@eigenrobot i dunno feel free to prove me wrong via an exhaustive accounting of all famous scientific papers and theirs authors ages, seems liek 2 much work
@kristineCreates basically reinforcement learning AIs training for hundreds of realtime years in simulation dojos and then being tested in the real world
since its so hard to gather real world data
@GuilleAngeris true lol. better heuristics replace worse heuristics. anyway do you have a read on how impactful this is? google published some eye popping results but it was for a toy environment
@eigenrobot@LudditeHacker the steelman is more like in areas where new ideas are more important than conservation should take young ppl seriously (science, tech, business, etc). the bright side of all those areas is that nobody can fuck around and become an accidental Maoist in charge of shit that matters
@eigenrobot@LudditeHacker you have to earn your keep by eg providing better products and services or writing papers that people want to read or things like that
letting thousands of high variance flowers bloom works when the superstructure is bound by some kind of darwinian fitness
@eigenrobot@LudditeHacker in short thesis would be: young ppl prolly have worse ideas on average, but higher variance in that the outliers will b quite important
@GuilleAngeris lol big if true. will read more later but thats a higher level of grifting than i would've expected if they're trying to RL optimize convex opt problems
@GuilleAngeris@DogIsABot seems hard to believe that nvidia and intel, some of the largest companies in the world, aren't doing all they can to optimize routing & placement with modern optimization methods. wish google could compare with, say, the state of the art internal tool at nvidia
@halvorz and to be fair, what we know of transformer models suggests that indefinite scaling is real
https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.08361
can't easily translate those claims to bio brains tho obv nor more holistic intelligence criteria than "test set accuracy"
@isaac_lewis correct on all counts, but its still neat how far modern AI optimization has come. to the level where it's infecting the chips that run it
@ded_ruckus yes agreed, but if simple layout changes work you allow incremental improvement without retooling the fabs. eg if you can somehow gain 5% power efficiencies here and there just by moving around nanowires w.o needing totally new fab techs that's a nice and cheap win
@ded_ruckus layout optimization would never get you a step size improvement, gotta look to the fundamental physics and engineering of fabs for that. even still, chip companies keep moore's law going via micro optimizations at every layer of design
@jekbradbury@alth0u@ded_ruckus compilers already have heuristic cost models right? so presumably you could just drag and drop replace and leave it at that
but doubtful
@MahmetTokarev i would be very surprised
em is scifi technology -- we are not anywhere close to brain scanning
i can clearly see the onramp from here to general intelligence
@TurboRational slack is built on electron eg javascript v8 engine & chromium
and i'm sure many modern SoCs like M1 are benchmarked on browser performance and such
@ollyrobot so my read is that
the current starlinks at their terminal orbit are at like +5.5 mag brightness where +6 is roughly invisible to the naked eye in a dark field
so yeah you will see this things in the darkness but they will be dim
@ollyrobot and if/when they add these DarkSat things (which amount to basically black hubcaps) it will go past +6 to be invisible in dark sites
and the operational time of a starlink is like 2-3 years so if they launch the new program all bad sats should be outta the sky asap
@ollyrobot but of course its valid to wonder if spacex will actually follow through on using the darker sats if it adds cost and eats into their margins. my read is probably yes so that at the least they dont get into trouble with any governments but could be wrong. can see the concern
@ollyrobot sorry to spam your replies with nerd bullshit im on stimulant fueled bender rn
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2101.00374.pdf
looks like the biggest problem is that there are outlier observations sometimes when the sat catches the light wrong and becomes pretty bright
@wowholyfucking yeah i mean forget the astronomers but i can understand complaints if there are 50,000 sats ruining everyone's naked view of the night sky
@ThatsMauvelous cautiously taking my rt back bc some of my followers will consider this crass materialism
but its tru and i dont think its a bad thing. need more natural MDMA plugs
@gbrl_dick i think its like an early cycle in innovation curves
marginally adding a computer + touch screen makes most products worse but is a necessary local minimum before shit becomes cool
@gbrl_dick at first they were making smart fridges that were doing fuck all like twitter for samsung smart fridge or see what items are already inside the fridge among other stupid shit
but now they're doing like predictive processing of what produce you're gonna need and auto ordering it
@gbrl_dick yeah fr many things should have either
(1) a frontend that is an app on your phone
(2) voice UX
rather than creating permanent liabilities to write frontend software for fridge touchscreens that nobody will want to work on after like 2 yrs
@halvorz ya this is the only one that pisses me off
usually in these debates the effect sizes are trivial and study results are uncertain it won’t matter either
@notlinear1 to be honest the worst kind of SWE is not “product first” or “tech first” but like “process first”
gotta write a design doc before they wipe their ass
@GuilleAngeris@eigenrobot@houellebecq_2 I dunno I just seem to meet an absurd concentration of interesting people here, especially off of twitter
everyone has their own project going in the background that they’re willing to pitch at a moments notice and finally I just like going to work in a high rise