@tszzl — page 4/103

2019-09-15 → 2019-10-18 · posts 1501–2000 of 51,350
>the banking system is dumb and bad >use bitcoin, which only has an HOUR transaction delay
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @isosteph
@isosteph O no people aren’t dressing in a manner that signals their wealth
4 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @offquietly
@orkoliberal as for why screens have gotten bigger I imagine it's a simple tech war. they're bigger for the same reason TV's have gotten bigger and bigger at the same price point. without much other information, a customer is going to choose to optimize on a single highly visible attribute
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@orkoliberal I have a 10s max just to flex on the 10s users (And also because i felt bad walking out of the store with the slightly smaller screen)
· ↳ reply to @webdevMason
@webdevMason This is literally way more american than tracing your lineage to the mayflower
4 ♥ · x.com →
the slow degradation part of aging is scarier than death
6 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
think it's pretty wild that lots of folks find immortality research distasteful. pretty sure they'll change their mind when they're 60-70 and their once nimble mind can no longer learn to work the remote or smthng
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
"Life is only precious because it ends" is an oddly market based approach. Water is valuable and not that scarce. diamonds are scarce and we could easily make do without them
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @goblinodds
@goblinodds True. Infinitely easier to cope with the brutality of nature by shifting the idea into “the austere beauty of the natural world” or something
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@goblinodds most people these days spend their time locked in man vs society conflicts rather than man vs nature ones, which molds which concepts they pick as friends or enemies
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @robinhanson
@robinhanson Why are we expecting convicts to know how they’re gonna be treated inside various jails tho. Mostly, they’re not gonna be informed consumers. If they actually know how the inside of every jail in the area looks, we’ve failed in other ways
· ↳ reply to @nmeier21
@NickMeier21 @karlbykarlsmith In Ontario’s defense it’s probs better to sell weed than opioids/cocaine😅 but True, completely agree that ontario should liberalize pot and alcohol. If anything put a tax on it and raise money for the gov while discouraging drug use
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@NickMeier21 @karlbykarlsmith Canada intervenes unnecessarily in a ton of their markets, including imposing limits on maple syrup sales to keep the global price artificially high
· ↳ reply to @robinhanson
@robinhanson Has any country tried this? More important, has anyone tried incentives for rehabilitation and penalties for recidivism?
· ↳ reply to @naval
@naval Is it possible that this restless anxiety has been a human constant for basically all time and we only just now have the tools and time to discuss it Not sure if I agree with the anti-modernity implications of this
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @nmeier21
@NickMeier21 @BetoORourke I was really rooting for him going into this campaign but it’s been heavy cringe from there My god, do you remember that journal?
· ↳ reply to @born_to_post
@iridiumzeppelin Honestly if you’ve only managed to expose yourself to people on this site who you think are stupid, that’s on you
· ↳ reply to @asteroid_saku
@asteroid_saku @ahuang7 When apple released iPhone, people were shocked that you could browse the web, call, and listen to music on the same device with the beauty of multi touch. These apps were all fairly simple, were they not? Or do I just see it that way in hindsight
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@asteroid_saku @ahuang7 If that’s anything to take note from, shouldn’t VR take off by augmenting the UI on a set of very basic applications?
· ↳ reply to @canderaid
@canderaid Joe Biden and Corn Pop, two rivals whose legendary battle and subsequent friendship reverberates through the mists of time Like Gilgamesh and Enkidu, Goku and Vegeta
6 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @ebruenig
@ebruenig Oh, you know, just any of the worlds billions of workers sensitive to oil prices
· ↳ reply to @vgr
@vgr Someone will 10x the current standard in messaging
@johncarlosbaez @ESYudkowsky The polypropylene reusables becomes more efficient than normal bags at around 37x uses, which is probably doable for some
5 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @CNLiberalism
@ne0liberal @NeoLibBen Doesn’t matter dude, they didn’t deserve the liquidity. We’d have space age banking by now if we allowed most of the banks to fail and the Fed decided to just prop up the paper markets :^)
· ↳ reply to @Noahpinion
@Noahpinion seems like you're reaching real hard to defend rent control and not quite getting there
1 ♥ · x.com →
@LLW902 the big short got me to vote bernie not sure what that says about me
1 ♥ · x.com →
lmao anti-doping agency prohibits genetic modification
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@jdcmedlock @_Jason_Dean_ @The_Albatross Honestly though, no credible VC cares a dime about intellectual property when investing in a company. For that reason alone, I seriously doubt patents protect innovation
· ↳ reply to @jdcmedlock
@jdcmedlock @_Jason_Dean_ @The_Albatross Generic drug makers have the benefit of not having to pour immense effort into drug discovery; a tedious and difficult process. Even still the market for generic drugs is less than a fifth that of brand drugs
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@jdcmedlock @_Jason_Dean_ @The_Albatross There is no getting past the fact that more than 60% of global pharmaceutical R&D spending is done by American pharma companies. We subsidize those producers in India who constantly tell us how unfair our drug pricing is
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@jdcmedlock @_Jason_Dean_ @The_Albatross Without the ability to own information, the backbreaking search for the right molecule cannot be rewarded, especially not by revenues made on selling that molecule
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@jdcmedlock @_Jason_Dean_ @The_Albatross Even a patent tax is a delicate proposition because every $ less of R&D funding means lost cures, and loss of human life because of it. We make that bargain in exchange for greater accessibility. The consequences for having no patent protection at all are positively genocidal
· ↳ reply to @jdcmedlock
@jdcmedlock @_Jason_Dean_ @The_Albatross The prize thing is great, but I think not that different from the price boards. Instead of giving a lump sum gift, the price boards assign an end price of marginal cost + innovation gift per pill, which is then usually paid for by NHS or something so the costs are socialized
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @paulg
@paulg If everybody is cancelled ... no one is
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @NeerajKA
@NeerajKA @ne0liberal why would you let your company's work stall for 2 days instead of just breaking the door
132 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @JacksonKernion
@JacksonKernion @MadelineOnMars @conorduffy_7 @OldDreyfusard Yeah I don’t necessarily think “stanning” politicians is bad. It makes life more fun. The truth though: it also makes us blind to people’s flaws and unwilling to award people points when they make valid criticisms ; the ever present hazards of hero worship
1 ♥ · x.com →
@CascadianSolo do you mean print newspapers? bc lots of local newspapers have moved online and are doing fine, if weaker than before
@CascadianSolo you laugh now but one day the SV immortalists will actually crack death and you'll love them for it
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@CascadianSolo unironically though, I think the tech press loves reporting on shitty startups like this one. In the East Coast media's mind, there are like 3 startups: Theranos, WeWork, and Juicero
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@CascadianSolo there are tons more startups getting funding building tech that takes a phd to understand, but these aren't going to make headlines
@CascadianSolo If for every 100 (or even 1000) shit startups, there's one landing rockets on 10m x 10m platforms in the middle of the pacific ocean, i'm okay with it
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@CascadianSolo but I do take your point that grifting investors seems to be a lucrative career path
beto's one liner about taking guns away is gonna be forgotten by democrats by next week but the right wing shows are about to use it to scare their audiences for years
8 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @visakanv
@visakanv there's that cow that's supposed to have kicked over a torch and started the Great Chicago Fire
4 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@visakanv "the fire destroyed an area about 4 miles long and averaging 3⁄4 mile wide, encompassing an area of more than 2,000 acres. Destroyed were more than 73 miles of roads, 120 miles of sidewalk, 2,000 lampposts, 17,500 buildings, and $222 million in property, ..."
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@visakanv "which was about a third of the city's valuation in 1871." hard to beat this one :(
2 ♥ · x.com →
a lot of people led me to believe that employers are gonna do some FBI level social media sleuthing to see if I've ever said anything fucked up before hiring me. i'm now certain none of them care in the slightest
6 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @villi
@villi @Katie_Roof earnings don't mean shit. nobody makes real money on a salary. it's about that capital doing work for you
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @larajaan
@larajaan @visakanv true but I choose to believe it anyway bc it's a great goddam story at the very least, it was her barn that first caught fire so it's still within the envelope of possibilities
· ↳ reply to @ahardtospell
@ahardtospell Some folks in this area are taking a tepid stance on licensing reform for doctors, but that’s the most important one of all. Smash the AMA’s rent seeking licensing quotas and let hospitals decide who they’re going to hire
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@ahardtospell It’s not at all like medical licensing had prevented the thousands of alt medicine scams from popping up . Wtf is a “Doctor of Naturopathy”?
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@ahardtospell Without AMA’s quasi monopoly doctor salaries and therefore medical expenses will plummet
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @CNLiberalism
@ne0liberal His light touch market based approach was the best thing about him A charismatic neolib, I’m not sure they exist anymore
· ↳ reply to @conorduffy_7
@conorduffy_7 People who don’t embrace modernity are often intolerable. It’s a form of magical thinking to be hung up on stuff like this
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @ewpaisley
@ewpaisley @conorduffy_7 it's about making one's personal aesthetic into a moral imperative instead of using their own personal resources to get there this is the same ideology that births restrictive zoning
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@zck Schumer is a good asset for Facebook but not nearly enough.
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @zck
@zck The Democrats are probably a bit confused at how little ring kissing there’s been from the newly dominant industry
4 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @jdcmedlock
@jdcmedlock @MattBruenig I tentatively support M4A, but it seems to me getting rid of employer based is the smallest possible policy change for the most immediate positive effect
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@jdcmedlock @MattBruenig long term insurance contracts that allow companies to think in the span of decades will incent huge investment in preventative care, which will in turn cut costs
· ↳ reply to @jdcmedlock
@jdcmedlock @MattBruenig Not necessarily! so many elderly are on Medicare because of employer based healthcare. After they retire, their coverage is either greatly reduced or ends. But with people buying contracts on their own, they might choose to pay premiums long after they retire
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@jdcmedlock @MattBruenig Barring that, government can regulate contract lengths to encourage long term thinking or subsidize long contracts
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @ryxcommar
@ryxcommar pretty sure the ideal politician is someone popular who represents a gradient in that direction
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @jdcmedlock
@jdcmedlock @ryxcommar I don't understand how everyone who supports the carbon tax hasn't managed to frame it yet as a tax on the greedy oil corporations. the fact that the left doesn't love this is a huge marketing failure
11 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @conorduffy_7
@conorduffy_7 I think the SEO algorithms repost article links on twitter every few months to keep the clicks coming
· ↳ reply to @Aella_Girl
@Aella_Girl Easy for people with big houses and lots of goods to say Our system should work to give a path to a better standard of living for anyone who wants it
5 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @TrevMcKendrick
@TrevMcKendrick Y’all make a maximum of $30k per student right? At a 5x P/E multiple you’d need profits of $20b. I’ll assume you have something like 10% margins. So you need roughly ~8m grads per year? And why would 8m students go to one school? What happens when colleges start offering ISA?
37 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Austen
@Austen @TrevMcKendrick I mean tbf Trevor is saying “if you don’t think Lambda is worth at least $100b, you’re an idiot”
1) this is almost definitely a tourist store to give the appearance of plenty. Tactic out of North Korea 2) choice isn’t about making inane consumerist decisions between peanut butter A and peanut butter B. choice is the great equalizer — if you make trash product, you’ll die https://x.com/JordanUhl/status/1175470999044841473
24 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
The fact that there’s five indistinguishable varieties means all of them are better than if there were one
9 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @agraybee
@agraybee To be fair lots of leftists have praised him for it. Not ur usual lot on twitter though
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @offquietly
@orkoliberal I don’t think most people really realize what it means to make production a democratic process. If 51% of the population are religious Catholics, no one can get abortions or birth control? There is no freedom without free markets
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @DIorioNathaniel
@DIorioNathaniel False; in the 1st world, we mostly don’t have obligations. Nobody will die if we run away and do nothing productive for a few years. We create our own obligations from personal objective functions.
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@DIorioNathaniel Whether that’s to produce interesting results in some area of science, become the best at some game, or to be a great parent, the fundamental quality of liberalism is that we are free to choose — no one can force us. This is the engine that unlocked the potential of our species
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@DIorioNathaniel Never forget it and never let anyone take it away from you. This is why it’s ridiculous for the government to offer a “jobs guarantee” instead of a UBI.
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @CNLiberalism
@ne0liberal If the solutions are not deep tweaks at the systems level they are probably going to fail
@gbl_4 I feel like the ads are specifically selected to make you angry
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@gbl_4 I wonder if they have an algorithm over there trying to maximize for Premium converts over actual ad clicks
@gbl_4 I believe the Geneva Conventions needs some amendments
@CascadianSolo Wrong. The transaction fees would be somewhat higher, and the miners would have to go running around in search of nuclear powered electricity. The system itself would be fine The difficulty of mining is itself variable — if fewer people are mining, the rewards come easier
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @ESYudkowsky
@ESYudkowsky @ArtirKel Is it possible that physicists have collectively agreed that it’s easier to sell popsci books if we subtly endorse many worlds
· ↳ reply to @AletheiaAtheos
@AletheiaAtheos @DanSchneiderVI @jdcmedlock @Noahpinion He was a furious open borders advocate and made headway with Reagan in pushing for the multifarious diverse talented democracy we have today. Not to mention getting rid of the draft and championing the ideology of individual freedom. Imo he got the broad strokes correct
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @MenshevikM
@MenshevikM [ diaspora ex Hindu ] I don’t think bjp support is very common among second generation Indian Americans. First gen immigrants often harbor islamaphobic sentiment. My parents started off liking him and then turned on him after demonetization and other worrying news from India
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@MenshevikM But I think you’re looking at this wrong. No matter what party the Indian PM was from, many Indian Americans would enthusiastically go to an event where that PM was visiting — feels good for the PM to acknowledge the diaspora
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@MenshevikM “Worrying news” being reports of political dissidents being jailed among other regional politics issues
@CascadianSolo Then why should our policy goal be to preserve it as farmland?
@CascadianSolo I’m v unconvinced that farming is better for the environment than an amazon warehouse. Slap a carbon tax on and let the market decide. Also unconvincing that food security would be affected by a marginal decrease in USfarmland, when food is an enormously complex supply chain
· ↳ reply to @CNLiberalism
@ne0liberal carbon in the atmosphere is a technological problem. you can put a price on it and reverse the damages via the market. loss of life is a moral problem -- you can't fix it
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @SailorHaumea
@SailorHaumea Bad take — my friends father worked for the UN WFP. Their family moved every few years, and he’s one of the most interesting kids I know. Having a stable upbringing is completely overrated
4 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @MenshevikM
@MenshevikM This guy knows exactly what he’s doing lol It’s impossible not to react to this
@CascadianSolo It is strictly better than the current welfare benefits
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @trekonomics
@trekonomics This doesn’t seem so dumb actually. As the stock price fluctuates with changes in market conditions, you can learn a lot about real world micro Econ. Maybe tomorrow trump reaches a trade deal with China and the intel stock price goes up 10%. Its a fun auxiliary activity
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @InertialObservr
@InertialObservr @litgenstein is this true? would you agree with the statement that there's no object in the cosmos moving at constant velocity from its own inertial frame? doesn't everything feel the net tug of gravity?
· ↳ reply to @Noahpinion
@Noahpinion If you realize what world trade has done in the direction of reducing human suffering, and go ahead and throw a wrench in it anyway, you aren’t just a bad politician, you are evil. Every other policy position she’s taken is relatively unimportant compared to this
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@Noahpinion If it doesn’t fill you with deep apathy and cynicism to support a very smart candidate who knows better but has pivoted to killing people in the developing world for populism’s sake, then I’m questioning your motives too
2 ♥ · x.com →
Hella easy to blame the people in power for doing nothing. Now go look at the polling for how unpopular carbon tax is. It’s your fault too. If the electorate knew what they’d have to give up to solve climate change and accepted those costs anyway, we’d have solved it long ago https://x.com/uhshanti/status/1176211370171228160
6 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
Folks would rather depose a a few presidents before seeing their gas price go up
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @DanielTakash
@DanielTakash True, but unhelpful. This is the same kind of argument people use to defend socialism in Venezuela and elsewhere. “If only the CIA hadn’t ...”
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@GGreyscale @Noahpinion It doesn’t matter if our corporations rip their teeth out when we still pay them double what they’d be making as subsistence farmers
· ↳ reply to @NeoLibBen
@NeoLibBen She’s not selling anything ya know It’s entirely possible to be convinced of wrong things (in this case only slightly wrong)
1 ♥ · x.com →
@NeolibShill first, i'd have to tilt my head down to look at him
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @nithin_vejendla
@nithin_vejendla So there are degrees of severity to carbon tax, with voters in France and Australia absolutely freaking out when raising the price has been suggested. A $5/ton carbon tax looks almost nothing like a $50/ton carbon tax, and the IPCC is calling for something like $135
· ↳ reply to @BrettRichey
@BrettRichey @AlanMCole @swinshi to be fair the Betfair UI is p bad compared to something like predictit. It doesn't have the diversity of contracts or stylistic charm -- it presents contracts in the sports bets way as odds instead of the the predictit way (probability, futures contract)
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@TrevMcKendrick the inputs for the left are just a different set of aesthetic traditions: a sense of struggle against hierarchies and an appeal to nature got very little to do with reason / rationality
· ↳ reply to @Noahpinion
@Noahpinion this gets everything wrong (1) the social cost of carbon doesn't really need to be known -- carbon tax isn't truly pigouvian (2) a carbon tax IS the NUDGE for industries to do technological switching, and a much more intelligent one than via regulation
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@Noahpinion (3) guess how we're going to fund those smart grids? carbon tax
· ↳ reply to @NeoLibBen
@NeoLibBen best way to browse facebook is to skip the inane social content from ur idiot friends and go straight for the ads
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @jdcmedlock
@jdcmedlock @archibaldcrane I generally think this whole endeavor is a bad idea. what about folks who are valued in the top 1% via very illiquid assets, such as equity in some startup? There may be no liquid market to convert those shares into cash to give to the government
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@jdcmedlock @archibaldcrane why not just pump up the estate tax a huge amount? or has this become political suicide ever since the whole 'death tax' rebrand?
· ↳ reply to @jdcmedlock
@jdcmedlock @archibaldcrane just caught that, but I think the only real innovation here is the "back tax" capital gains model on private assets. if you just exempt privately owned assets, all assets will become privately owned, and Americans will lose access to one of the great engines for building wealth
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @jdcmedlock
@jdcmedlock @archibaldcrane I'm not so much worried about difficulty valuing private assets as I am about destroying the equity-funded startup model, which has created so many of the winners of our time. If you make it too painful to sell equity and receive financing, the whole game is broken
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @AndrewDixonSo
@AndrewDixonSo @visakanv Typical starlet things. Drugs, went to jail , generally hated in pop culture. The tabloids loved her, then they turned on her. Maybe we can still count that as a W for Paris.
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@jdcmedlock @archibaldcrane I don't share the distaste for inequality that many do. The objective should be to increase the consumption of workers, not decrease the consumption disparity.
· ↳ reply to @nithin_vejendla
@nithin_vejendla My point is that the carbon tax at the level needed is deeply unpopular and if mild semantic changes shift views by 20 points, the poll respondents clearly haven’t understood the costs
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@nithin_vejendla It’s easy to see this by the way people react to new gas taxes, or how much parliaments have struggled to sell them in other countries
· ↳ reply to @nithin_vejendla
@nithin_vejendla Yeah carbon tax + dividend is still my alpha and omega for climate change. I love it. I just think it’s going to require some political innovation to sell it that we haven’t quite grasped yet. Getting to $135 will be hard
· ↳ reply to @Theophite
@Theophite Do you really think there’s enough local franchise owners for this
@zkproofs @mutual_ayyde There are tons. Pikketty is super easy to understand. Any leftist worth their weight in shit should read “capital in the 21st century”
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @mccormick_ted
@mccormick_ted I’m not sure I agree. In computer science / information theory, there’s a clear tradeoff between memory and computation. In other words, knowledge and logic. Most usable algorithms fall somewhere on the Pareto curve.
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@mccormick_ted But it’s also clear that there’s outsized returns for methods that favor logic over knowledge; the so called “first principles” thinking. Most lines of reasoning that start from first principles will end in abysmal failure, but the ones that don’t shift paradigms
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @chrisiousity
@chrisiousity @mccormick_ted information theory presents itself everywhere in the history of science and technology, and even in the organization of economic resources. For example, Hayek's model of prices as information flow mechanisms prioritizes parallel computation over memory
· ↳ reply to @EPoe187
@EPoe187 is the idea that human intelligence and language evolved to process gossip still in vogue?
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @chrisiousity
@chrisiousity @mccormick_ted For example, if you look at the structure of most scientific revolutions, the big insights come when someone decides to question premises that everyone else took for granted. Einstein decides that time is not absolute and is able to upend physics; by forgoing existing knowledge
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@chrisiousity @mccormick_ted there are thousands of people who probably tried to abandon similar physical principles and failed (computation). the deeper down the tree of knowledge you go and upend basic principles, the harder it is to recompute everything else on top of it
· ↳ reply to @jdcmedlock
@jdcmedlock @gabriel_zucman @AndrewYang why is spending instead of investing a desired policy outcome? invested capital makes labor more efficient and therefore raises wages. I suppose this is an aesthetic choice, but I prefer incentivizing billionaires to keep their wealth invested than buying extravagances
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @chrisiousity
@chrisiousity @mccormick_ted I think you misunderstood my whole premise if you think I'm "great manning" science. My point is exactly that Einstein got lucky and found one of the many parallel search paths that worked
· ↳ reply to @trekonomics
@trekonomics So your ethic command you to leave barren lifeless rocks as they were? I don’t think this is at all premised on commonly shared moral axioms. Leaving nature untouched is the exact opposite of what most religions preach: “go forth and multiply, fill the earth and subdue it”
· ↳ reply to @jdcmedlock
@jdcmedlock @CascadianSolo Sure, but still clearly less productivity gained than lost. Aside from a few anecdotes about sports, this article has nothing in the form of data.
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@jdcmedlock @CascadianSolo If companies could get greater value out of more employees at fewer hours, they would be doing it. There's clearly huge communication/networking cost to adding new members to a team. A player like Amazon that hyperoptimizes worker performance would have been all over this
· ↳ reply to @jdcmedlock
@jdcmedlock @CascadianSolo unless I'm mistaken, this also creates the perverse incentive of hiring workers for under 30 hrs/wk to keep from paying health benefits. I've read many an article re: people in warehouse style positions who would ideally work *more* hours than fewer
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @JohnCarltonKing
@JohnCarltonKing @jdcmedlock @CascadianSolo I'm by no means claiming that all markets are perfectly efficient or anything like that haha Only that this is a super easy idea to come up with and test, and probably has happened hundreds of times in business history, and has not succeeded in any visible way
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@JohnCarltonKing @jdcmedlock @CascadianSolo I buy @jdcmedlock explanation that companies are bound by per employee fixed costs, which may warp their decision making, but not that they could magically increase the firm's health after benefits payouts by employing more people at fewer hours
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @EndaHargaden
@EndaHargaden I don’t understand how people can be viscerally angry about wealth that never gets spent — it’s a Fugazi, it ain’t real
@HarperMitchell Making money isn’t about consumption dude, it’s about power. You can reorganize the way the world works for better or for worse. It’s more noble than running for political office because you’re likely to have created value while doing it
18 ♥ · x.com →
@HarperMitchell so if someone is manufacturing smart bombs, there's only one reason for doing that, which is that the government wanted it. very likely that if your friend (or someone else) didn't make those smart bombs, they'd use other more dangerous ordnance to achieve their ends
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@HarperMitchell you're making a separate case here that natnl defense isn't valuable, which is a subject that's very much up for debate. Either way, make enough money and you can lobby the government to *not* do that, if you don't support the wars they're fighting. that's what you can do w >300k
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@HarperMitchell my point here isn't about bombs or government, but only that you can definitely not be a psycho and find good ways to use a much vaster sum of money than you'd be able to spend on vacations and personal freedom
· ↳ reply to @_Jason_Dean_
@_Jason_Dean_ truth is he's very public facing and has the appearance of being more influential in obama's foreign policy than he was. His greatest skill was appealing to Obama's idealist side. He personally campaigned inside the obama admin for military action and syria and didn't get it
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@_Jason_Dean_ to blame ben rhodes for any of these failures is to give him a lot more credit than he deserves
@accountable_gov @_Jason_Dean_ if you can blame anybody for obama not intervening in Syria, it should probably be the American electorate. Military action was *deeply* unpopular at the time, and that was obama's critical input
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @NeoLibBen
@NeoLibBen @ArtanXhezairi he was pretty remarkable. His major flaw is that he was pretty uncritical of colonialism. To seriously suggest that the British colonies got more out of it than the British themselves is ridiculous
· ↳ reply to @yhdistyminen
@koaleszenz Is there any evidence that it’s hemorrhaging subscribers? People say they’re quitting Facebook en masse like every few months but the quarterly reports show the numbers steadily tick up
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@m0ve_im_gay @_Jason_Dean_ I’ll be honest, I don’t know much about Iran but I agree with Rhodes that the Saudis and Emiratis are scary as fuck. Maybe they aren’t the ones destabilizing world trade at the moment, but it won’t do to be complacent with them
@andrewmoo22 @EndaHargaden If money sits in a bank and isn’t used, how is it creating power? The solution to your problem would be to tax political donations as consumption.
· ↳ reply to @jdcmedlock
@jdcmedlock @bufordsharkley VAT >>> LVT tbh. Henry George’s ideas about owning land worked 150 years ago, but it’s no longer even close to the most important factor of production, much less actually monopolistic. My hot take is that most Georgists are land use liberalizers who’ve lost their way
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@jdcmedlock @bufordsharkley In the modern world we should probably use Henry George’s ideas to tax property that’s actually monopolistic, like, say, drug patents :^)
2 ♥ · x.com →
@andrewmoo22 @EndaHargaden He became president because Americans liked him. He underspent his opponent Like I said, CEOs of small companies can be more powerful than much wealthier trust fund kids. People who own small shares of corporations can control majority voting
· ↳ reply to @jdcmedlock
@jdcmedlock @bufordsharkley All private property is monopolistic of course, but I'm speaking in terms of degree here. The amount of monopoly power you have as the sole producer of, say, Gala Apples is small, compared to the sole producer of Daraprim
@andrewmoo22 @EndaHargaden if it was instead controlled by thousands of people worth $50 million, do you think they would direct it more responsibly? I'd wager the exact opposite
@jomgy Rip I’ve angered the georgists
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @bufordsharkley
@bufordsharkley @jdcmedlock “Implicit collusion” is just market consolidation. how is it that Manhattan rents keep rising, but Tokyo rents are stable or falling? Could it be that nimby’s are preventing housing competition via planning and zoning? Or are the Japanese landlords just nicer and won’t collude?
· ↳ reply to @bufordsharkley
@bufordsharkley @jdcmedlock Land is not special. The fact that landowners benefit from positive externalities is not special. If I own a share of Facebook, and tomorrow intel starts producing chips at 1/10th the price, I will reap the positive externalities.
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@bufordsharkley @jdcmedlock if the assumption of complete monopoly power is untrue, then LVT will get passed onto the tenants. I currently live in an urban core. Am I paying at the height of my willingness to pay? Not even close. If people aren’t at their WTP, everyone’s rents will rise
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@bufordsharkley @jdcmedlock Georgists should just admit they like LVT for punitive reasons rather than anything regarding efficiency. You feel land owners have committed some original sin and they have to atone
· ↳ reply to @fchollet
@fchollet It *will* change everything, once a thousand applications and a million models slowly transition to it and I never have to look at a variable_scope anymore. In the meantime, we use PyTorch :^)
21 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
@CapitalNotLand @bufordsharkley @jdcmedlock Nonsense. When I buy a share of Berkshire (or a government bond), I do absolutely nothing and earn a dividend year over year. The entirety of the future payout is priced into the stock when I buy it. It's the same with land; all future land rents are priced in at purchase price.
@CapitalNotLand @bufordsharkley @jdcmedlock The fact that the landlord benefits from land accumulating unexpected positive externalities isn't mutually exclusive with what I said before. Tokyo could also have fell apart. Not all land appreciates, just consult about my father's investments in India :^)
@CapitalNotLand @bufordsharkley @jdcmedlock So, to be clear, I am not opposed to a small LVT. But the idea that some neolib adjacent folks on this website push, that it should be the main way we furnish governments in the future is beyond silly
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@CapitalNotLand @bufordsharkley @jdcmedlock Land is already a fairly bad investment. It’s supremely illiquid, suffers from externality problems and is very exposed to changes in local economies. Landowners take on huge risk. If I buy a house, and tomorrow my local school district ranking goes down, I’ll be footing the bill
@CapitalNotLand @bufordsharkley @jdcmedlock Neolib twitter is a subset of policy wonk Twitter. It coexists with Georgists, social democrats, and even neocons. Either way, you hear about LVT way more often on this site than the topic deserves
· ↳ reply to @MaxGhenis
@MaxGhenis Doing God’s work here. The left has collectively lost their minds. Since when did making the rich poorer become more important than making the poor richer?
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@andreasklinger And instead of a shitty rating system people vote with their feet
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @offquietly
@orkoliberal It’s true that Gainax had some hand in inventing fan service, but imo nge is tasteful and purposeful with it Almost always leads to a character moment
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@orkoliberal One of the major motifs behind nge is the main character’s burgeoning adolescence and growing up. The show is overtly sexual, even in the opening song
· ↳ reply to @offquietly
@orkoliberal Lmao I guess you’re not the target audience, but I will say this show was life changing for me. Idk if you you’re talking about it in retrospect but my advice is to stick it through if not. You don’t really have to relate to Shinji to enjoy it. I find asuka more compelling
· ↳ reply to @GarettJones
@GarettJones @AriDavidPaul @DavidGNI How exactly do people think crippling the company will make them better able to wield resources to defend against nation state level attacks 5 small facebooks will fare a lot worse than FB
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @DavidGNI
@DavidGNI @GarettJones @AriDavidPaul Not at all lol, twitter is absolutely ravaged by botnets despite it having a much smaller reach than Facebook. If what you said is true, then we'd see Twitter being too unattractive to focus resources
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@DavidGNI @GarettJones @AriDavidPaul In the span of time since the 2016 election they've devoted oceans of capital to building up the election security infrastructure in a way -- they spend more on security than twitter makes in revenue
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@DavidGNI @GarettJones @AriDavidPaul Also, scale is relative. Sure, Facebook has a large reach over how people chat with each other online, a tiny portion of the economy at large. Intel has a 100% monopoly on server grade processors but you never see anyone complain about that
· ↳ reply to @zebulgar
@zebulgar The idea of organizing an event around contrarianism is pretty self indulgent, but carry on
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @david_perell
@david_perell which is the sole reason why markets and democracy are the best way to organize society — design the objective function and let organizations grow and die around it
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @AndrewSolender
@AndrewSolender Nah, this is just wrong. Wouldn’t you cheer if Stalin got a blocked artery? I’m obv not saying Stalin is comparable to Bernie, but politicians and billionaires who can make decisions that affect millions or billions have to be treated separately from ordinary humans
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@AndrewSolender i.e. it is moral to hope for someone’s death if it would prevent two more.
· ↳ reply to @dakami
@dakami She explicitly doesn’t want to do anything to make nuclear viable
· ↳ reply to @fedtanyl
@NeoliberalFed this article is just straight up magical thinking. Even if the wealth tax actually worked, drastically encouraging the rich to consume instead of invest might be the stupidest idea ever had in economics
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@NeoliberalFed nor do I want to live in a world where founder's control over their company gets eroded away to the rent seekers and finance guys (or even worse, the government)
· ↳ reply to @poojasubb
@poojasubb But wouldn’t you agree that some injustices more urgently demand solutions than others? There is a scale of severity right?
· ↳ reply to @MaxGhenis
@MaxGhenis I sleep better knowing that founders still have control over their own companies rather than the money men and rent seekers. Would hate to see that balance destroyed
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @nmeier21
@NickMeier21 Emerson is shit and I’ve also lost all faith in polling after 2016, especially in the Midwest
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @NateSilver538
@NateSilver538 It makes sense to bet disproportionately on the tail risks. The weirdo candidates who are X factors. Betting a ton of money on Kamala Harris or something wouldn’t make sense at this point
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @K_Pushkin
@K_Pushkin @spectatorindex for ex. China GDP per capita has grown around a 1000%. Without mentioning the fact that it's limited to Europe, you're painting a picture that Russia is the fastest growing country in the world
@RJLvegas @Robyn9124 There are literally a handful of people in the world who could competently run a Fortune 500 organization. Paying them a few million to tend to empires that generate 100s of billions in revenue is more than reasonable
· ↳ reply to @naval
@naval Have u ever accomplished anything other than sloganeering
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @yungneocon
@yungneocon Thinking this is the height of cruelty. Access to contraceptives & the ability to delay having kids vastly increases a woman’s quality of life
· ↳ reply to @yungneocon
@yungneocon Lmao our sex Ed classes talk about controlling teen pregnancy. Is it because our schools are waging a sterilization campaign on us? Gates Foundation consults with local women to find out what the easiest way to give them a *choice* not to have kids is
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@yungneocon When a family can delay having children to when they’re actually ready they can think about investing in themselves by going to school etc.
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@Noahpinion that's why all the big name leftists are Brooklynites and spiffy looking dudes like @AnandWrites. This is a hobby and a claim to fame for them.
3 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@Noahpinion @AnandWrites They want cultural power that they don't have and these are the means to achieve it. I won't fault them or begrudge them this but that's all there is to it. Working class folks want steadily rising incomes, they aren't reading Jacobin
4 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@Antifauxpas @Noahpinion @AnandWrites any of these people could have easily found a well paying job in something marketable if they wanted to, having attended a high rank university or college. They *idn't want to*. They're searching for more than survival, and think the universe should be kinder to their search
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@Antifauxpas @Noahpinion @AnandWrites But I don't agree. I'm not really interested in subsidizing upper middle class dreams to become writers or philosophers or something. By all means, do these things if they provide more utility than the money lost, but it's not our job to willfully overproduce philosophers
· ↳ reply to @Antifauxpas
@Antifauxpas @Noahpinion @AnandWrites I don't think these folks are dumb at all. The people I'm talking about are just fighting for their own interests, like everybody else. I just have a different set of interests and a different direction I want the world to evolve
· ↳ reply to @vc
@runvc Why do you even need to invoke the simulation premise to make this argument? You've lost the lede here. We know AGI is possible because the universe follows strict reproducible laws, and we exist in such a universe
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@runvc i.e. intelligence is algorithmic
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @vc
@runvc @JuJoDi It’s obvious our intelligence is not general — we’re good at the very limited set of things that allow us to parse and survive the real world. But it’s general *enough*
· ↳ reply to @vgr
@vgr “Twitter but only for people I agree with”
4 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @jdcmedlock
@jdcmedlock @Noahpinion @AnandWrites Don’t think I’m disparaging them; what I’m saying is almost tautological. *everyone* wants cultural power, but upper middle class people are well situated to get it and fight for it. It doesn’t mean they don’t genuinely believe in what they say
1 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Noahpinion
@Noahpinion 1) steadily increasing carbon tax 2) deregulate zoning/ land use 3) end employer based healthcare 4) steadily increasing UBI 5) new scientific moonshot project
14 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @wb_thorne
@wb_thorne @Antifauxpas @Noahpinion @AnandWrites World Gini coefficient and extreme poverty are both at all time lows, while only rich country inequality is marginally up. Again, this has to do with downwardly mobile people on the top 1% of the global income distribution wanting to ruin the human project for the other 99%
· ↳ reply to @wb_thorne
@wb_thorne @Antifauxpas @Noahpinion @AnandWrites Improving global welfare isn’t about giving away aid spending. It’s about maintaining free trade globally. Sanders and Warren both are endorsing tariffs so yes I do think socialist movements in America are willing to damage global workers to help them selves
· ↳ reply to @jackd1801
@jbduncan96 @_Jason_Dean_ @jdcmedlock this is why I like universalist schemes such as UBI. There's no expectations or strings attached that come with receiving your benefits. If you can get by on 12k a year, more power to you. You're a paragon of efficient living.
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Nate_Keating
@Nate_Keating @karlbykarlsmith There are certain moral judgements that it should be left to the people to make. 1) don't know what you mean by non scalable. With smart phones and PKI, scalable public voting should have been implemented yesterday
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@Nate_Keating @karlbykarlsmith 2) shifting decision making away from the center is (sometimes) good. that's been the theme of the 20th century. too often the benefits of extra information are lost in the center bc a representative is forced to make a suboptimal choice for political reasons
· ↳ reply to @jackd1801
@jbduncan96 @_Jason_Dean_ @jdcmedlock In the long term, the vast majority of human labor may not be as valuable as it is today. When that happens, everyone will more or less be "living on the dole". This is a *good* outcome.
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@Biedersam basically everybody is better off now than they were in the 1950s and you are living in a fantasy world
· ↳ reply to @Nate_Keating
@Nate_Keating @karlbykarlsmith For example there's a fundamental tradeoff between growth and inequality. That decision to make that tradeoff isn't one that'll be made better by having extra information. Or say, whether or not sex work should be legal. People talk about the crime stats, but the choice is moral
· ↳ reply to @Nate_Keating
@Nate_Keating @karlbykarlsmith bc simple moral choices are best made by summing the objective functions of all people. Why work through proxies if the question is something everyone can understand? 'should people be able to trade sex for money' is qualitatively different than how dialysis should be subsidized
· ↳ reply to @Nate_Keating
@Nate_Keating Good question, I don’t know. I guess I was imagining the executive branch having this power, but it seems easily abusable
· ↳ reply to @KevinCastley
@KevinCastley I think it’s more about being unconvinced of the success of military liberation pal When you install a blockade you hope it’ll own the CCP but you’re just owning millions of poor chinese farmers
· ↳ reply to @phunkshun
@phunkshun @banalplay @PissJugTycoon Completely agree, Bernie’s a goddamn treasure. It’s a damn shame his politics are pretty far left of mine I honestly think Obama could’ve clowned him though, that guys also got the gift of gab
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @dakami
@dakami Disagree. People are much more likely to back down in real life from their real viewpoint for social reasons. The zealous impassioned dedication to speak your truth only comes out online
· ↳ reply to @t3703
@t3703 @jdcmedlock When you build the house, you need tons of materials that’ll be subject to VAT. Downstream steph will be paying those costs in the subsequent deterioration of the home
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @jdcmedlock
@jdcmedlock Should be noted that the homelessness problem is basically due to rampant corruption in land use. We could fix the problem via market means. True that we probably won’t grow ourselves out of healthcare costs anytime soon, but there is some large degree of rent seeking there too
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@jdcmedlock Redistribution may not even help the homeless if supply problems aren’t fixed. Would prefer mass dereg but also open minded to building social housing if it’s politically easier
· ↳ reply to @t3703
@t3703 @jdcmedlock Honestly that’s fine by me. The percentages don’t really matter post redistribution. If wealth is either investment or consumption, then I don’t see a good moral imperative to tax investment. Investment raises wages and raises growth.
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@t3703 @jdcmedlock But investments will also be hit by VAT. (1) if you consider invested wealth as future consumption, the VAT will be paid later. (2) if you consider an asset like a stock, which represents a DCF of a company, it will lose value as profit margins are thinned by VAT
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Altimor
@Altimor Need powerful tools to defend our attention and consumption behavior to fight the powerful tools sapping our attention and our money
· ↳ reply to @adamnash
@adamnash @Noahpinion @_Simon_K @kevinakwok Can be fairly simply explained by the fact that the US overrelies on the cost plus contracting model whereas other developed countries work with fixed cost contracting model An extremely simple misalignment of interests that government will pretend not to understand
@accountable_gov @InTheLionsDen_ Neocon twitter maligns him all the time for crimes he didn’t commit. Still, neocons and neolibs arguing makes me wistful for better times
· ↳ reply to @teddygoff
@teddygoff smarter people were pulling his strings, and it really doesn't help or hurt anyone to excommunicate an aged ex president with no power
Everybody on Twitter pretending that they wouldn't talk to a former POTUS if they got sat next to him
4 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @jessesingal
@jessesingal The corollary of this comic is that we can get angry at the corporations and communities that limit free speech.
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@jessesingal We don’t have to coerce them through legal means but through commercial ones
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@jessesingal The principle being defended here is liberalism: societies organized around voluntary exchanges. To get Blizzard/Apple and whoever else to stop misbehaving we need to incentivize it through boycotts and such
· ↳ reply to @CNLiberalism
@ne0liberal This seems inefficient. Isn’t there a way to buy gas masks and whatnot for protesters on the ground?
1 ♥ · x.com →
Everybody conveniently forgets how Facebook carried Obama to victory in ‘08. Engagement doesn’t mean “the biggest idiot wins”, it means the candidates have to be inspiring, interesting, and tech savvy. If you don’t pass that bar, you lose. https://x.com/WillOremus/status/1182688628708917248
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @marathiMaharaja
@marathiMaharaja Yeah u right that they weren’t nearly as big back then, but all of those users were US based, and the pundits at the time we’re writing analyses about how the Obama campaign was killing it on Fb
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @_Jason_Dean_
@_Jason_Dean_ Steph Curry’s a major face of the NBA. He’s part of the fabric of the brand. Completely different than a random jeweler
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@_Jason_Dean_ Part of the weight of being famous is to be a moral leader If Steph can’t stand up to the NBA and demand they do the right thing, who even can?
This is an incredibly dumb and dangerous ad campaign. We don’t know the long term effects of a lot of things, which is not at all an argument to ban. Come up with evidence that they’re dangerous and THEN run these ads. Until then, you’re just killing people who would’ve quit cigs
4 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
This is literally the Pascal's Wager of Juuling
· ↳ reply to @fchollet
@fchollet There can be a war raging without enmity. Facebook and Google compete with no mercy, but there are tons of emps who’ve worked at both companies
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@fchollet Any product fights for attention from the moment it’s born. Doesn’t mean there can’t be cross pollination
· ↳ reply to @gregeganSF
@gregeganSF The names aspirational. Hopefully one day Starship Mk. 38 actually makes it to the stars
@computergorl To the careless reader that’s no different than a lie. Most of us read the headline and keep scrolling. Either way, it seems dishonest
· ↳ reply to @thatjenmonroe
@jenniferm_q did the dog consent to being bought and sold on a slave market? I feel this isn't a valid argument
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
2) It would be very easy to bow to pressure and just delete ads that are clearly false. They're risking the wrath of both parties to take this current stand. Only one explanation for that madness: ideology, the dedication to free speech
· ↳ reply to @vgr
@vgr tbh it seems any sufficiently constructed hypothesis can satisfy this when you add the "or not"
· ↳ reply to @MaxGhenis
@MaxGhenis saving the economy from the bottom up would probably have been more efficient than saving the pathological banks
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@MaxGhenis would have gladly seen them all go under and the Fed itself open up paper markets. there are no markets if firms aren't allowed to die
· ↳ reply to @MaxGhenis
@MaxGhenis Absolutely, so hand out an unconditional bottom up bailout (UBI). Now I realize that may not have ever been within the envelope of the politically possible, but perhaps policies that are better aligned with this idea were possible
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
Kind of hilarious to read shit like this knowing that these people have never stepped foot in a place like rural India, where the government run power sector rations electricity so that it’s turned off more often than it’s on
4 ♥ · x.com →
@CascadianSolo My point being that blaming corporations is a stupid gut reaction, not that this outcome is acceptable
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @wesyang
@wesyang We should have people all over these spectra. A world where everyone is cooperative instead of competitive is no fun at all. With a diverse set of abilities, we can Pareto optimize
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@mattyglesias @normative Have fun demolishing the most vibrant part of the American economy while China’s companies take over the world
· ↳ reply to @Altimor
@Altimor You either die a hero or live long enough to see your PMs become afraid to talk to users
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @paulg
@paulg You mimetically acquire the things you love
Leaving this cursed app for TikTok anyday now
4 ♥ · x.com →
twitter has radicalized me into realizing the star trek Prime Directive is evil as hell
· ↳ reply to @wesleyytian
@wesleyytian as in the personal income taxes of employees they paid with the economic activity they generated
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @nmeier21
@NickMeier21 corporate income tax only accounts for about 9% of total government revenues, and our corp tax rates are as high as most of the Nordic countries. The majority of tax paid to the federal government is through income and payroll taxes, and this is for good reason
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@NickMeier21 it's an even lower % in the Nordic tax systems total yearly US personal income is around ~$15tr whereas total corporate profits is around ~$8tr capital increases the productivity of labor, so you can directly claim that companies like amazon and delta helped create those taxes
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@NickMeier21 the main way the federal government funds its activities is by putting tax incidence on payrolls. Personally I'd prefer a consumption (VAT) + small wealth tax based system instead of income, but as it stands we don't really need to juice the corp income tax
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@computergorl @maisany @PramilaJayapal @ewarren There are actually valid arguments for wealth taxation, but you won’t ever hear one from the “eat the rich” types. Capital gains punishes the most efficient capital holders whereas wealth tax punishes those with the smallest returns most.
Facebook is wild
9 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @owenrumney
@owenrumney 100% because Baader-Meinhoff The Fb audiovisual data conspiracies are ridiculous
@computergorl @GuilloMena @maisany @PramilaJayapal @ewarren or work more hours if you believe that humans are *sort of* rational utility maximizers, then they'll be working less due to income taxes. That's not to say we should get rid of income taxes. Just something you have to keep in mind. there's no "perfect tax"
· ↳ reply to @MikeIsaac
@MikeIsaac many of these 35k are probably site integrity engineers i.e. people who build solutions that scale past themselves
· ↳ reply to @jdcmedlock
@jdcmedlock $1000 a month is the difference between leaving an abusive spouse and staying
4 ♥ · x.com →