@tszzl — page 24/103

2020-10-13 → 2020-11-05 · posts 11501–12000 of 51,350
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
actually sleep was invented in the 1700s to sell mattresses
178 ♥ · 15 RT · x.com →
@Teleonomic @conorduffy_7 yeah i can say without a hint of irony that one of our biggest problems is a lack of problems a la Fukuyama's End of History
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @conorduffy_7
@conorduffy_7 @Teleonomic yeah, tbh, i don't see how secular trends in birth rates halt or reverse without massive changes in ideology i would like to hope that opening the heavens would do it, but i kind of doubt it biological immortality is really the only thing that would guarantee high pop growth
2 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @gbrl_dick
@gbrl_dick lot of latent expectation for psyops built into the human psyche and very few actual outlets 🥲
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @QiaochuYuan
@QiaochuYuan tbh i think the lognormal speculation distribution is less stupid but still misses the point
14 ♥ · x.com →
@mutual_ayyde sapir and whorf's biggest accomplishment is getting the Arrival shoutout
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@browserdotsys actually i suppose you could do it with like ~60 3090s with a minuscule batch size lol
1 ♥ · x.com →
@gigafelon @browserdotsys those parameters are apparently worth $10 million worth of training (in just the final model training run) so would be surprised
4 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @PstafarianPrice
@PstafarianPrice I am wondering if there have ever been congressional hearings that weren’t clown shows at any point I want to believe the Lincoln movie is accurate
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @powerbottomdad1
@powerbottomdad1 reading something thats not entertaining (unless you're getting paid for it) is a complete L but im sure there are some sick and twisted people who find Capital entertaining
63 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
@AOCummies @AOCummies plz stop flexing ur special protected status among the twitter algorithms. u r being very insensitive to us PoC (poasters of color) that get banned for saying milquetoast shit like "fugly sl*t"
9 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @NLRG_
@NLRG_ @QiaochuYuan like QC says, the long tail is because the parameter for "how likely is life to form on an earthlike planet" is basically a fantasy parameter that stretches over 200 orders of magnitude, and I doubt even that estimate is accurate
17 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@NLRG_ @QiaochuYuan and it seems to me like describing the range as exponents of 10 is just a matter of scientific presentation clarity? does not seem like there's a robust reason for a log normal prior or a log uniform prior
4 ♥ · x.com →
@The_Geraldoid how can he be so bad at poasting. it’s kind of insane
2 ♥ · x.com →
@The_Geraldoid slap on the wrist fine and a restriction saying that all tesla related tweets would have to be approved by his board of directors lol. however he freely ignores that and the SEC doesnt do anything. not even the government can control Bad Poasts
2 ♥ · x.com →
@The_Geraldoid it would be very hard for them to prove that he didnt get pre approval probably half the board is his relatives and cronies lol
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @eigenrobot
@eigenrobot there is a notable Neolithic tribe that still hasn’t figured it out but i assume many of them figured it out 100,000s of years ago
5 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
i have very often seen analysis and write ups in the form of internal blog posts that are higher quality than conference published research
23 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@bayes_baes I did work in a chemistry lab for a bit; they were more poorly organized but took better care or their data lol
4 ♥ · x.com →
@cosmotechnic @bayes_baes yeah, i get what you mean I think; it’s the sensation of tinkering with various hypotheses, and investing more into the ones that actually work, without artifice, like a very smart bandit algorithm
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@cosmotechnic @bayes_baes the “quality” of the research or care taken with the analysis is downstream of this I would say
2 ♥ · x.com →
wow this is way better than the a16z podcast
29 ♥ · x.com →
oh you solved Starcraft? unreproducible, i don't have 10,000 computers oh you made a tiny improvement on a learning algorithm? unreproducible, probably just bad hyperparameters on the control trial https://t.co/oifXNMpwi8
26 ♥ · x.com →
@AOCummies pusillanimous fool's gold piece of shit
5 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
the future is just jeff bezos funding 10,000 thinktanks full of overproduced elites studying various useless topics so they dont rebel
1,015 ♥ · 73 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
honestly, this is a good future
64 ♥ · x.com →
@forbca lmao wow everything repeats huh
12 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
i would also wager that learning about the world in the form of 500 page airport nonfictions made artificially longer for the sake of the publishers is probably not efficient
16 ♥ · x.com →
@forbca ive read like a quarter of it, but tbh not that interested in economic history
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @sonyasupposedly
@sonyasupposedly kind of had the exact opposite reaction to this these shapes look quite unpleasant precisely because they're organic and trigger disgust instinct 4th one will straight up ruin any tryptophobics
8 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@sonyasupposedly guess i'm thoroughly modernistcucked all the way to the aesthetic layer 🥲
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @eigenrobot
@eigenrobot how do we not have a New Zealand type area for testing new laws smfd
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @sonyasupposedly
@sonyasupposedly hmm this doesn’t seem like something that has to be “theorized” since there are modern forager societies we can study
11 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @sidkap_
@sidkap_ Piketty and Pinker are notable mainstays of the TED Talk circuit class both probably bestsellers in amazon nonfics anyway this maybe a side message from pbd's thing
4 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @gbrl_dick
@gbrl_dick this is a key pathology of modernity tbh. still can’t believe we had a news cycle where we were convinced 30 ads from low tier Russian shitposters won enough hearts and minds to change the US election outcomes
6 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @rplevy
@rplevy of course, we get many orders of magnitude fewer experiment arms to work with than biology, so all things considered we’re doing ok
6 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@rplevy if we could trial a billion micro service architectures in parallel I suppose we’d get it right pretty quickly too
3 ♥ · x.com →
the oceans will evaporate and sun will burn out before nutritionists settle their bullshit debate on fat vs sugar
40 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
@forbca if you read kindle it actually will get tracked!
ok so which tiktok girls are we pretending are actually smart and insightful to counter signal this week
57 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @ExiledInfoHaz
@RokoMijicUK tbh Elon and bill gates can probably be counted as rationalists. I’ve seen the former actually refer to the Basilisk before
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@RokoMijicUK the latter is clearly the grandmaster of “effective altruism” type interventions
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @jachaseyoung
@jachaseyoung this is the undersold alternative to the paper clip maximized dystopia. whoever is the first to a powerful AI and figures out a way to control it will become hegemon
2 ♥ · x.com →
@guywhits little known boutique software called Microsoft Word, it’s pretty niche
7 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
some people document the most difficult problems and bugs they’ve solved so they can talk about them in interviews and such I try my hardest to forget them
20 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @skinnystevejobs
@daninutero me forgetting the worst debugging sessions of my life is like women forgetting the pain of childbirth so they can go on to the next one
hahaha dumbass ants. humans would never death spiral in a complex failure mode of a collective optimization behavior, r-right guys?
664 ♥ · 90 RT · x.com →
extremely fucked that this got more engagement than my actual twete
178 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
wait a second --
381 ♥ · 63 RT · x.com →
worst career progression of all time
12 ♥ · x.com →
mcdonalds $1 drip coffee is one of the legitimate wonders of the modern world
50 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @vgr
@vgr not sure how R&M made its way all the way up there haha
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @eigenrobot
@eigenrobot This is the ideal male body. You may not like it, but this is what peak performance looks like
33 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @jachaseyoung
@jachaseyoung it almost *has* to be better right? assuming any of the 100s of vaccine candidates work and scale up, the joy of just being able to move freely again will be amazing (at least in the US. not sure how rest of the anglosphere is doing)
7 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@AaronEstel @jachaseyoung whatever the secular trend of US politics is, it seems hard to argue that an economic recovery and general good health won’t lift spirits in the short run
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @mlanetrain
@mlanetrain are the markets super concerned with vote tampering? seems like the only thing that could warrant such a deviation from polling
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @mlanetrain
@mlanetrain lol how is Australia with gambling laws? please go make a killing on this my friend
1 ♥ · x.com →
@guywhits that orangutan is OUT come January!
1 ♥ · x.com →
i got an email telling me one of my deadlines had been extended so i reactivated twitter. then i got another email saying the last email was a mistake. what the fuck
72 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
according to a new study ur fat and dumb
51 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
what could it mean 🤔
78 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
@rbbrbrrn imo it’s funnier when it’s negative you know what I’ll twist it positive in the replies
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
study failed to replicate. Ur actually cute and funny :)
29 ♥ · x.com →
what happened to her 👀
14 ♥ · x.com →
@guywhits i choose to imagine that this likely 30 something dude is actually nancy reagan
8 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @jachaseyoung
@jachaseyoung where do you fall on this? i tend to buy into the “pattern of information” theory of mind. as long as there’s continuity of software you’re alive. but this is all a cope because i can’t convince myself of this at the gut level. would still not want to walk into the teleporter lol
6 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@jachaseyoung however if you asked me whether I’d be ok with slowly replacing my brain piece by piece with machine elements I feel like I’d be fine with it instinctually lol. though the processes are indistinguishable
6 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@jachaseyoung also noticed how brain surgery seems like a terrifying loss of self but taking psychoactive drugs for the long term ... feels ok?
5 ♥ · x.com →
bill gates and elon are “rationalists” in all but name. the former is the god king of effective altruism and the latter unironically believes in roko’s basilisk lol not to mention the collisons who tweet rat adjacent stuff all the time https://x.com/nosilverv/status/1318930165834174468
48 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
i wouldn’t call myself a rationalist at all, but some of these critiques are pretty weak. the lesswrong types do in fact believe in developing and trusting in instincts
14 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @undo_hubris
@FlawedRubi the point is that BG shares the general utilitarian naturalist convictions of the rats
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @jachaseyoung
@jachaseyoung is true, and even it was permadeath it could still be valuable. i think a lot of people would trade death for long lasting glory/legacy or the livelihoods of their children (extensions of their own patterns).
1 ♥ · x.com →
one thing about writing papers is that by the time you're finished it is absolutely impossible to see the scientific value in it lol. it just looks like overengineered nonsense to me
45 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
@HitzelChris not sure. there’s a lot of cognitive and academic infrastructure built around the paper/conference/journal constructs I guess. Very difficult to switch to something more bite sized and informal
@HitzelChris feel like you could do signaling and review even with a decentralized system
best time to be on twitter is when some game changing tech stuff happens i miss gpt3 discourse
55 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
you're in the club and this guy slaps your girls ass, wyd?
106 ♥ · 6 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @jachaseyoung
@jachaseyoung i think 3d printing is reaching price points that finally live up to its promise and it's not yet hit the mainstream awareness yet
10 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@jachaseyoung crazily enough, social media is probably still underappreciated in terms of impact (whether negative or positive i cannot say)
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @jachaseyoung
@jachaseyoung unfortunately i can give you a catalogue of things that i think are overhyped but not many that are underhyped i think the modern AI rev gets the appropriate amount of attention
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@jachaseyoung one important thing may be that I have good reason to believe moore's law is not dead despite Intel and others trying so hard to convince us it is. expect processors to continue growing exponentially more powerful and with it unlocking entirely new modalities of computation
1 ♥ · x.com →
WHO BUILT THE CAGES JOE?
18 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
this is the future liberals want
115 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
i never understood the Akira thing where they're just hungering for the destruction of civilization but these days i get it
27 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
honestly if it comes out that you can delete 90% of a mouse genome and not destroy anything crucial Taleb will be thrown out to the streets https://t.co/qqUyLGug7T
30 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @averagely
@averagely the only guy representing my interests in the entire government
7 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @yhdistyminen
@koaleszenz from a high level philosophical view, scientists successfully identifying a bunch of DNA that actually turns out to be legitimately useless in a complex system would be devastating his ideas
4 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @vsbobclear
@vsbobclear @koaleszenz for example he is very much against GMO because he's afraid of the unintended consequences of tinkering with these systems
7 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@vsbobclear @koaleszenz FTR i tend to agree i doubt that everything we think of as 'junk dna' is actually without function think back on the doctors thinking tonsils were truly useless organs but i don't know enough about this to take a stance
3 ♥ · x.com →
borat 2 is punching down
34 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @paulg
@paulg @Austen any metric once used for optimization becomes useless it's only a matter of time before the new search engine sucks too the only way to get out is to use a search engine technology that's too small to merit SEO
4 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @luke_metro
@luke_metro it’s fine it’s not awful or anything the commentary is just very cringe
4 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @alth0u
@alth0u totally agree and they didn’t lean into that in borat 2 have not ever laughed harder than when he tells Pamela Anderson that he’s the son of “bardok the rapist”
4 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
god fuck there are 5 panels. im not sending my best
22 ♥ · x.com →
@ellegist selection pressure with the influx of would be “science communicators” and the lack of actual advancement in the field you have to embrace populist woo to compete
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @alth0u
@alth0u i think all the platforms do combination lump sum + royalty contracts
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @jachaseyoung
@jachaseyoung With the wonders of the global web, we have built an optimization engine to find and surface the most condensed form possible of each valuable lesson, virtually guaranteeing that the internet will be better at teaching children than schools
7 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
after the libs spending the last 4 years “discrediting social media” this is the stance they’re gonna take huh
24 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
the quest to find strong AI is a journey into our own minds
22 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
every discovery we make re: the capabilities of giant neural nets has philosophical implications for animal/human cognition and vice versa
20 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @alth0u
@alth0u will be absolutely brutal tbh already saw a bit of that with the language models
3 ♥ · x.com →
@neolibureaucrat as in that's your prior or you are implying that it's my unstated prior?
@neolibureaucrat what are the alternatives to mind = machine? what would the implications of mind != machine be?
what would the economic effects of curing biological aging look like? altered carbon gets it completely wrong btw
36 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @NLRG_
@NLRG_ the only completely correct answer
6 ♥ · x.com →
@PereGrimmer does this include upbringing? children will just die w.o parents protection
· ↳ reply to @_Jason_Dean_
@_Jason_Dean_ pop growth would go way up and we’d probably have the Malthusian explosion that we avoided for the last few hundred years
5 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @TokenFredo
@T_Walt615 fewer physical risks but more financial/status game risks probably you can always take an L on a startup and come back from it
7 ♥ · x.com →
@wolfred_bromley For example, zuckerberg would only be rich until such a time as someone builds something better than Facebook right? So if you assume healthy competition and steady technological change, we shouldn’t have a permanent oligarchy
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
6’2” = king of manlets 6’3” = genetically ideal Chad
25 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @aifjs
@aifjs Oh no on a percent basis it hit you much harder
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @thinkingcloud
@thinkingcloud Is humanity split into eg those who can afford smartphones and those who can’t? Not really. 13 years after iPhone, even the peasant farmers of India and Africa can afford smartphones
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@thinkingcloud not to mention that generally pharmaceutical therapies are so cheap to produce that the drug companies give them out for free in low income regions
· ↳ reply to @KHicksEfficient
@KHicksEfficient not really retirement funds are unnecessary when nobody retires and medicare is cheap if it doesn’t have to disburse any end of life care. Imagine treating a bunch of people who are 20-30 years old in terms of health — no cardiac conditions, no diabetes, organs in perfect order
1 ♥ · x.com →
unfollowing all the right wing accounts b/c i am getting too redpilled and i sense my employability dropping by the second
136 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @KHicksEfficient
@KHicksEfficient SS is a social contract with the elderly; provide for your society during the years that you can and we will provide for you when you can't. if they can indeed be productive workers, then that social contract falls apart, regardless of the letter of the law
bottomwit: haha foreigners funni midwit: "borat is a satire on the intolerance and cultural myopia of americans" "borat is unacceptably racist to the kazhaks" topwit: haha foreigners funni
39 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
the thing I love most about veep is that they spend a whole episode shitting on nate silver
23 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @lauralondon_
@la_la_london_ in altered carbon, only the rich can afford biological immortality for centuries when we've seen with developments in biomed and computers technology that prices are generally deflationary ... stuff that's accessible only to the rich becomes democratized in a decade
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @_rnair_
@nair_rohit98 will children never grow up? forever under the wing of their rich parents?
it's remarkable how little power the social media companies really wield when they could destroy or create politician's entire careers on a whim by making slight tweaks to the ranking algorithm
46 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
the gulf between our expectation of their power and their actual power is where all the russian intelligence bogeymen and cambridge analytica hoaxes slide in. people are in disbelief that such awesome power is in the hands of so few who totally refuse to use it
24 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
and even now when mark and jack seem to sort of understand, they mostly just kowtow to the whims of the regime to downrank minor league reports about hunter biden
15 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
to get a picture: if FB wanted, it could easily target Get Out The Vote ads to likely R voters in swing districts and move the needle without breaking a sweat. the fact that it doesn't actually do this is ... kind of inexplicable?
17 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @wannabegroncho
@wannabegroncho yeah lol imagine thinking we spend 24 hours a day glued to twitter due to the brilliance of their engineering we do this to ourselves
3 ♥ · x.com →
the core conceit of the Social Dilemma falls apart when you ask yourself: am I really addicted to twitter due to the brilliance of twitter engineering? the very same one that has a data breach every other month and the DMs don’t work on an average day?
63 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @alth0u
@alth0u yeah w.o a doubt but back then even making social media ad buys was innovative and new
4 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @techsasbro
@ne0agent1c oh definitely they’ve applied a blur filter to the whole political system but they could definitely pull the levers on targeted outcomes if they had the balls
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @alth0u
@alth0u agreed but it takes the onus of blame off of the dealers and puts it on the ... existence of chemical dependency
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @leaacta
@leaacta i can empathize with all the common answers on here fuck this was the infohazard wasn't it
8 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @BrentlyLee
@BrentlyLee tristan harris has an object level point and also a much scarier nexus of meta level implications re: insidious genius engineers half a world away finding microscopic openings in your mind to steal your attention the object level point is not that hard hitting in isolation
@browserdotsys "experts and data" just hit the pavlovian response trigger and now i'm mad for no reason
42 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@browserdotsys my mind security for this is so brittle that if they switched up the keyphrases even slightly i'd probably believe it
16 ♥ · x.com →
@mutual_ayyde @alth0u yes do we love twitter due to cheap psychological tricks of the platform or deep instinctual hunger for (social) information? the moral consequences could not be more different
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@mutual_ayyde @alth0u in the former case, twitter can be "solved" by turning it into a utility and removing the profit motive in the latter case our descent into madness is inevitable so long as social media exists in any form
1 ♥ · x.com →
human in the loop AI is always a local minimum — agents trained this way will retain the biases of the human experts. The gold standard is learning from data generated by the agent’s interaction with the world. reinforcement learning from scratch.
22 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @alth0u
@alth0u oh yeah for sure in many problem spaces it reduces the computational cost by several orders of magnitude to get to a working solution
3 ♥ · x.com →
@PereGrimmer @olivertraldi arguing in a tweet thread can only make a few people angry at a time but engineering a online quiz designed to point out irrefutable evopsych differences -- now you're creating chaos and disharmony at scale
3 ♥ · x.com →
wait a second how have the Jains been avoiding eating yogurt as to not cause harm to microorganisms for several hundred years before Robert Hooke
36 ♥ · x.com →
@browserdotsys im imagining him sitting alone in a giant lecture hall way in the back
11 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @rplevy
@rplevy no they seem to have understood in some capacity that microbes turn milk into yogurt
10 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @ChrisCroy
@ChrisCroy the thing is jains have believed in microbial organisms since prehistory and somehow related them to yogurtification its not a modern practice
6 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @edavidds
@edavidds can do this under some sort of hush hush campaign the algorithms are opaque and there are very few people who would notice even inside the company
· ↳ reply to @__ice9
@__ice9 indeed, the clear anti trump bias of the tech industry is proof positive that they didn’t tap even a percent of their ability to move the needle in 2016
5 ♥ · x.com →
@neolibureaucrat doesn’t matter if it leaks towards the tail end, after the government is filled with friendlies due to such election interference. granted any half measures would be worse than nothing at all
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@neolibureaucrat not to mention, if we are looking at a really ambitious takeover Zuck could kill the distribution of the leak story. This doesn’t work in 2020 since cable still exists, but how many will get their news from non SM sources in another twenty years?
@neolibureaucrat without a doubt this is a far off scenario. Not saying it will happen today or tomorrow but he who owns the flow of all information in a democratic society is all powerful
1 ♥ · x.com →
@neolibureaucrat also the flaw with your argument is that any story will not be allowed to “come out” in any meaningful way if it displeases the big bosses. It could get hunter biden’d except a lot worse
@AOCummies this dude is famous for publically making a lot of predictions abt which tech companies going bankrupt and having a 100% failure rate
22 ♥ · x.com →
@browserdotsys tfw Wall Street was anticipating the good news but quantitatively larger good news
12 ♥ · x.com →
@gigafelon @browserdotsys had to spin my nips paper as positive for the environment for the required “social impact” section lol
3 ♥ · x.com →
@browserdotsys @gigafelon tbf I got away with a single poorly argued paragraph and it’s supposedly not counted towards acceptance decision
4 ♥ · x.com →
@gigafelon @browserdotsys yeah leaves a bad taste in the mouth handful of ideological rent seekers extracting O(n) asymmetric proof of work
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@gigafelon @browserdotsys also seems p disingenuous because it’s anywhere from hard to impossible to predict the long term social impact of a new technology if I could do that I’ll just happily make a billion dollars on the stonk market
2 ♥ · x.com →
you’re at the club and this guy slaps your girls ass wyd?
39 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @_djpn
@_djpn @turrible_tao she screenshotted my relatively innocuous reply to one of her tweets to her thousands of followers and then blocked me without giving me a chance to defend myself lol
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @_djpn
@_djpn @turrible_tao the exchange iirc taylor: the tech industry would be better if it was run by wammen me: point out that sheryl sandberg basically created the digital ad duopoly taylor: blocced buddy
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @leaacta
@leaacta to my great regret im still convinced that technological advance is a moral good
18 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
inb4 "everything you see is reimagined by your own optical cortex"
23 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @jstn
@jstn the hunger for bandwidth is literally inexhaustible internet traffic grew every year for the past 5 years by 25-30%
5 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @incondrulity
@Human9b6c432f all modern reactor designs just turn themselves off when deprived of water we are not in the age of shitty mass produced soviet union reactors
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @incondrulity
@Human9b6c432f even with unreliable water sources the LCOE of nuclear is far below wind, solar etc "why not just go with renewables" is a false dichotomy; the energy mix of the future will most likely be solar and nuclear in tandem
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@Human9b6c432f the amount of batteries you'd need to build to make solar the sole source of energy is truly enormous, and is only plausible when considering future technological breakthroughs, not to mention the race to the bottom for rare earths etc
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@Human9b6c432f OTOH we've had safe nuclear reactors for decades and they get better all the time
· ↳ reply to @postjawline
@billpshort sending billions of images across the internet pipes is very difficult and expensive so they send a compressed, smaller version and have an AI on your end “imagine” what the original high res image looked like
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
really @dangercat5000 all this means is that you’ve regained my follow with your 🔥 content 7 individual times
10 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
I will always defend the humble predictit trader betting $10 based on what he read on twitter over mr. nate pyrite
22 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
@Cullen_OK our ability to do CBA on complex ecologies without actually running the experiment is pretty limited imo in this case the order of magnitude analysis alone is enough to discount the argument but in the general case status quo bias is probably good
· ↳ reply to @_djpn
@_djpn unfortunately my political predictions are even bigger shitposts than my stonk picks
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @_djpn
@_djpn I gotta say being right on Tesla was an absolutely great feeling, because I actually like the company and it’s style. Being right on politics is ... not as fun
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@_djpn I’m maxed out on a few predictit markets but not that emotionally invested strangely
1 ♥ · x.com →
“everyone hates economists bc we’re unbelievably winning and have huge dongs”
102 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
i think this is a cope from literal decades of having completely unremarkable uninspiring leaders most of us want a Lee Kuan Yew elder statesman grandmaster type but we're resigned to the fact that we won't get one https://x.com/ahardtospell/status/1322283724583718912
79 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
"listening to the experts" is highly overrated in that the skill of the manager is in distinguishing which lieutenants are hucksters and which are productive, a problem much more difficult than selecting those publicly recognized as "top" in the field
43 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @alth0u
@alth0u lee kuan yew exudes a gravitas that even a western could respect
5 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
in the private sector the best performing companies are led by visionary CEOs who are clearly brilliant at their respective niche of e.g. product, engineering, talent acquisition, etc
28 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
uhhh soo i seem to have done something stupid and unfollowed everyone lol
85 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @_djpn
@_djpn i will slowly refollow everyone in my sphere lol
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@_djpn kind of siked. bout to have a much slimmer follow list
4 ♥ · x.com →
dude this shirt’s not old it’s lindy
40 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
martin shrek’s only crime was not raising drug prices enough
31 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @conorduffy_7
@conorduffy_7 i get the feeling most early technologies have zealot early adopters so it may not be a good signal
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@conorduffy_7 look not to the tech bros but what people are accomplishing w crypto in countries with poor banking infrastructure
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @_w0bi
@_w0bi @conorduffy_7 yeah don’t get me wrong bitcoin/crypto gets far more attention than it deserves there have been thousands of startups in this space and very little ROI aside from Coinbase, which is mostly just a speculation business
5 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Cantide1
@Cantide1 @metametrician what are these methods? starting to think there’s no way to have a healthy information economy if you have Apps
4 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@NemoBane @jcfanacct to the extent that they do its because of their pathological asociality and delusions of grandeur
I do believe that the media used to be better before the internet only monopolies have the luxury for “don’t be evil”
15 ♥ · x.com →
@Rushil_Kaul1 I can think of many examples of groups being beneficent and individuals being evil
@Rushil_Kaul1 not really, it’s absolutely a luxury eg the Stephen pinker argument material abundance gives people the opportunity to not be murderers and slavers
· ↳ reply to @NemoBane
@NemoBane 1)game dev slept with journo so he’d promote her game 2)hilarity and outrage and psyops ensued online 3) then the liberal mainstream media picked up on it and wrote outrageously dumb things 4) few years later Donald trump is elected 5) yes these are all connected
18 ♥ · x.com →
@AOCummies id let her lecture me for hours on intersectionality despite working in corporate strategy for a sociopathic New York new media company
7 ♥ · x.com →
I think it’s pretty clear now that Taiwan will be reabsorbed into the mainland and American leadership will do nothing about it they don’t have anywhere near the political capital to compete with the ironclad will of the CCP for reunification
77 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Seeking__Gnosis
@GreenShootsS i was expecting the US to at least thwart the first few attempts for reunification but it will be uncontested lol
6 ♥ · x.com →
@ProfoundProfit does not help in my experience nor does the black and white shit cold turkey or nothing I guess
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @alth0u
@alth0u is that posturing? why would they destroy all the economic value of Taiwan?
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @alth0u
@alth0u i am sure you know better than me but it doesn’t seem like the Chinese would tolerate a state genocide of ethnically Han people
3 ♥ · x.com →
love 2 confidently make third order commentary on the discourse about discourses without actually reading anything related to current events
22 ♥ · x.com →
lmao @ the depth of narrative control it requires to convince people that hunter is someone you should feel sympathy for, like he's comparable to unemployable fent addicts in the midwest
43 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @eigenrobot
@eigenrobot unclear to me why {BigTechCo} doesn’t solve this problem with their massive audiences
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@eigenrobot also I think on top of all these problems the pollsters likely have no idea how to figure in the massive changes in “likely voter” distribution due to historic levels or absentee voting
3 ♥ · x.com →
I am a single issue voter with my single issue being that the results must humiliate nate silver
551 ♥ · 51 RT · x.com →
@oldvillagesage I fully understand that hunter Biden as a discussion topic is yet another layer of psyop just find it amusing nothing that happens in October should change anyone’s vote
@oldvillagesage his models are vastly overrated and he acts online like questioning them is sacrilegious
9 ♥ · x.com →
@spookintheshell its not that I could do better it’s that election models are fundamentally not useful and polling accuracy is in crisis
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @_Jason_Dean_
@_Jason_Dean_ the average pundit has no clue what’s going on and knows it so they just say what’s on their mind nate silver is likewise clueless but dresses it up in the veneer of science to lend credibility to his punditry
10 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@_Jason_Dean_ it’s not that he personally isn’t doing a good enough job it’s impossible to deliver the level of guarantee he promises based on the shit quality of public polling even he knows this so he’s been doing emotional hedging for the past month
8 ♥ · x.com →
@marthsshinedair nothing special tbh i maxxed out on Biden general election ~6 months back and I haven’t changed it since then
· ↳ reply to @eigenrobot
@eigenrobot smh how can anyone read this and not think he’s either a grifter or an idiot lmao
10 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @gbrl_dick
@gbrl_dick @eigenrobot i like your optimistic nate theory better but he shits on dissenting views too often to get the benefit of the doubt haha
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @discourseloverr
@discourseloverr @The_Geraldoid like ... do people think that kids in china are learning anything other than chinese history? with a brief chapter on europe and the west everyone teaches their own story ofc
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@overtone_window balaji also skated out of his encounter with the legendary T Lorenz pretty ez
7 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @postjawline
@billpshort @discourseloverr disagree imo the long term low fidelity view of history is more important than the short view I’d rather we cover Ancient Greece than 9/11 (ideally we can do both)
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @postjawline
@billpshort @discourseloverr wouldn't you want it in higher fidelity as you get to the new stuff? e.g. you might cover hundreds of years of greek history in one lesson but you might spend a whole chapter on just the 1930-40s
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@billpshort @discourseloverr high level pitch is: there are an abundance of people who have a motivation to learn about current events / contemporary history. i'd need to know what 9/11 is to have any convo about america
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@billpshort @discourseloverr but the framing of our lives as one era in western civilization (and more broadly in human history) is v useful and harder to pick up on the fly the value add of a school should be imo stuff that's both (1) useful and (2) you're not likely to learn by yourself
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
does it mean that they’re better? we’ve arrived at the final evolution? or is it a bottlenecking event before a Cambrian explosion
7 ♥ · x.com →
lmao ❤️ lee kuan yew
91 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @NLRG_
@NLRG_ i think not everyone is cut out to “learn to code” and that transforming the whole working class into knowledge workers is a pipe dream
@ribaldette no idea all I know is that ubi is no panacea
1 ♥ · x.com →
@spookintheshell @kushnerbomb @spiderfoods ok sure but what i'm describing here is a common argument made about the "dignity of work" etc skepticism that the ruling class has solved the problems with policy buzzwords the cynical take is that ubi is the best we can do; the optimist take is that there are better worlds
@spookintheshell @kushnerbomb @spiderfoods the american welfare state is founded on the WASPy work ethic principle of getting people back on their feet and back to work rather than as a permanent situation. as opposed to many of the systems in europe if you think that's inherently fashy take it up with the country
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @jeff82874662
@jeff82874662 @DistractedAnna i think i'm speaking more broadly and across several country's cultures there is a lot of homogenizing going on and lots of countries local politics are looking like proxy battles in the same culture war
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@jeff82874662 @DistractedAnna oh and -- from a more superficial view if you go to any major city in the world* you will see the same 5 coffee chains, same hairstyles, same luxury clothing brands, same songs playing at the clubs, skyscrapers designed by the same 20 architects, etc *except maybe china
2 ♥ · x.com →
@neolibureaucrat nothing significant really; Hong Kong situation deteriorated further but it was expected mostly i just realized how important Taiwan is to Chinese pride
CONDITIONED ON OWNING A LANDLINE
34 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
i don't understand. where do they even find people to fill the 18-25 bucket
27 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @__ice9
@__ice9 this would make election polling much more fun
4 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @eigenrobot
@eigenrobot since there are no serious monetary rewards, predictit selects for ideologues and ppl who are too online
6 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
woefully bad polling
15 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @homsiT
@homsiT lmao I hope so becoming an talebian grifter
6 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
we are not about to hear the end of this one. censorship!
3 ♥ · x.com →
so what does the CIA really mean by "water main break"
41 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
this is insane lmao. Maximum keks. Map nerds completely destroyed
18 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @NLRG_
@NLRG_ uncertainty should be baked into the model there is no sense giving us 9:1 odds and then also telling us there’s uncertainty wider error bars = shorter odds
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @NLRG_
@NLRG_ - politically destabilizing, destroys whole regions worth of jobs - offshores defense critical components by overindexing on the guarantee of world peace - reduces innovative capacity: innovation and offshoring are actually competing for capital and attention
8 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@NLRG_ for point 3, the example would be that china is now leading in electronics hardware R&D since we shipped all the production lines off to china -- hard for us to really do hardware innovation when we're so far detached from all of it
4 ♥ · x.com →
lmao
102 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @samgdf
@samgdf what can i say, there's a market for sh*tting on nate silver
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
to be clear he won by double digits in the primaries
14 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
the implied betting market predictions on election night: looks familiar eh?
18 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @archiveOfAwe
@_vivalapanda maybe, but trying to analyze the last minute volatility of a futures contract is completely different than its predictive value ex ante
4 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@_vivalapanda like when oil contracts go haywire at the last minute, and some prices are negative -- it doesn't mean that the contract had no value predicting the future dynamics
3 ♥ · x.com →
the last minute volatility of a futures contract doesn't negate its predictive value. its like freaking out that Brent crude futures have a negative price moments before the contract closes. tldr the PredictIt map was way better than nate silver's map on the morning of https://x.com/_Jason_Dean_/status/1324140774041227265
23 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
RT locked account
3 ♥ · x.com →
the twitter autist braintrust is truly powerful. this would all be unintelligible without the Greater @mattparlmer Co-Prosperity Sphere
21 ♥ · x.com →
ok so it's time to stop taking everything in this thread seriously
21 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
noah "Here's How Bernie Can Still Win" smith
9 ♥ · x.com →
my friend is telling me that the chinese state news channels are all covering our election with great enthusiasm and close attention -- and what's more they're all cheering for Trump!
17 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @TetraspaceWest
@TetraspaceWest this is actually a really good toy demonstration. didn't think of it that way. does the effect persist at high N?
1 ♥ · x.com →
@maxdunat wow good job using inspect element loser
5 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @antoniogm
@antoniogm every organic system makes more sense once you understand chaos monkeys
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @xobnu
@xobnu markets and nate both predicted blue PA
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @xobnu
@xobnu yeah a lot of this was about the early narrative with Florida lol but it’s just hilarious to me that the model seems to not have understood anything about the systematic blue bias from 2016 the markets did on the other hand, and he takes every opportunity to shit on them
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @gbrl_dick
@gbrl_dick honestly pretty fascinating that the entire world is following our shit ass election as closely as we are
5 ♥ · x.com →
@The_Geraldoid recs seem to have gotten shittier i used to be much more addicted
· ↳ reply to @aniiyengar
@aniiyengar this is the future. you just have to make sure you have an aesthetic boring enough to not trigger this guy
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @__ice9
@__ice9 is this a function of more tests per infection or an actual CFR drop
3 ♥ · x.com →
yall pray for my boy pp. aint nothing wrong with him but he coping
23 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @rickyflows
@rickyflows @wesleyytian trade balance affects the currency exchange markets if the US is importing more chinese goods, it means a stronger yuan due to more demand trump -> protectionism -> less demand for chinese imports -> we convert fewer USD to CNY -> weaker yuan
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @rickyflows
@rickyflows @wesleyytian generally you want your currency to be weak if you are trying to boost exports they were artificially keeping it low back in the 2000s but yeah china would happily tradeoff tariffs for geopolitical wins
2 ♥ · x.com →