often times when going on Instagram the ads are more immediately high utility than the reels. it’s pretty incredible when you can monetize the user in a way that actually adds value to their life
advertising is a far more “aligned”business model than many others. it has been vilified for years for no good reason
user-minutes-maxxing addiction slop would exist with or without it. Netflix ceo (with subscription pricing only) on record saying “we’re competing with sleep” https://x.com/mcuban/status/1949204939508686929
this opinion is basically a relic of the late 2010s consensus that Facebook is an evil company (which it might be, idk) but that has more to do with them than advertising generally
@dpinsen the more you use it the more likely you are to stay subscribed. hourly active users are predictive of daily active users which are predictive of monthly subscribers. this is the same across ~every digital service I’ve seen
@mayfer journalism was a great business because newspapers had a monopoly on adspace. with ad space becoming abundant and highly efficient/targeted, journalism has lost most of its profit juice
@sailaunderscore netflix also has autoplay
plenty of regretted minutes are spent on netflix
i spend many more hours per week on nerflix/equivalent than reels
i have no idea if openai will ever lean into ads - don’t have any special knowledge or insight into that. just staking my position that I don’t think ads are wrong, as I have many times before
in some sense the moment you start surfacing e-commerce results you are doing a mild kind of unpaid ad space already
“lovecraftian cosmic horrors” are not real. nothing breaks people’s brains. those pakistani tribesmen that get access to the internet acclimate to it within weeks
@Noahpinion china will never invade taiwan because old men who have consolidated power don’t need to take risks like that. the stable equilibrium is to continue threatening it forever
the first thing you notice when you get off the eurostar train from Paris’ Gare Du Nord to London’s King’s Cross station is that everyone and everything is fried, chopped, and busted in comparison
@pli_cachete oh I see wow that’s a hefty formalization, can you train a model to do that? how much conceptually harder is it to formalize difficult problems (leaving aside riemann or other crazy stuff) than say run the IMO circuit
@Opno579942 yeah there are people whose brains would have broken in every age. normally they’re traumatized for the normal reasons: grief, breakup, family issues
it’s never because they learned something about the universe they couldn’t unlearn
@diverdes@Noahpinion Russia is a country in terminal decline, with its status as a gas station not being so important anymore. China is on the techno industrial upswing
im not sure why people are super mad at this, it seems pretty neutral given the authors certainly don’t like doge and luke himself comes across very likeable. definitely not a hit piece. all publicity is good publicity https://x.com/business/status/1950234147508691393
not at all? does anyone read!
> Will the young coders Musk brought to Washington remain? If they leave, what are their prospects? Jan English-Lueck, an anthropologist who’s been studying Silicon Valley engineers since the 1990s, says Farritor and others made a wager that will be “intellectually and emotionally celebrated,” no matter DOGE’s success or failure. “To gamble like that shows you understand the theater of Silicon Valley.” On July 23, Trump spoke at an AI summit in Washington. Afterward, there was a private party at a new members-only club. Farritor was among those invited.
moreover whether this is good for luke or not I think it’s entirely fair to the public to do some minor investigation into some very powerful people. tech people pattern match any profile article or clickbait headline to some kind of antisocial doxxing, but this isn’t that. it celebrates Luke’s technical skills, wunderkind upbringing, implies he’ll have a bright future whether in trumpworld or in Silicon Valley, and asks some light questions about the ethics of doge, all of which seems fair
@tbpn at the least you gotta add jakub pachocki, gb parascondolo, hunter lightman, wenda zhao, max schwarzer, luke metz, eric mitchell u can’t be weighting by twitter clout
@KTmBoyle they didn’t “go after” his mother, they seem to have written some publicly known info for one paragraph to explain his background and described her neutrally
people are notoriously bad at predicting these kinds of technology trees. 140 characters, web 2 led to giant adtech monopolies that built ai research divisions that led to the transformer. video gaming led to the company that creates H100 matmul machines at industrial scale https://x.com/InnaVishik/status/1950257451040985271
this is why “state capitalism” is fake, you cannot plan greatness, you cannot subvert the natural evolution of technocapital for too long, you cannot predict the industries that will matter today to climb the next branch of the technology tree
coldhealing in the year 2050 running the total recall experience machine a connoisseur of picking delicate memories that capture entire cultural moments to show his high class clientele
once I met the mayor daniel lurie and shook his hand. he looked at me as though i was an insect, made minimal eye contact, and moved on asap. in that moment I gained profound respect for him. one of the last remaining aristocrats
you have to aggressively read the tea leaves on topline single scalar metrics of enormous complexity to benefit the narrative of whatever shit you’re on about
@colin_fraser he wrote a pipeline that deciphers ancient torched scrolls into plaintext if there’s any part of the luke farritor story that’s untouchable it’s that he’s technically gifted
@colin_fraser even more rare than technical skill is that he’s a person of genuine curiosity and polymathic knowledge - if he was unqualified for some government tech job but we would’ve loved to hire him at openai it really says a lot more about the former’s hiring criteria than about him
@colin_fraser I think you are putting too fine a point on it but regardless iirc they are trying to interpret some weird 3d voxel data full of granular errors to find ink characters and then place them in the correct semantic order it doesn’t sound trivial
@carsonmcd@colin_fraser not what im saying at all im saying I know he’s got a breadth of knowledge from everything ranging from ancient classics to 3d printing/ manufacturing from talking to him. he’s not a common archetype
@colin_fraser@marksnidal you must realize that his python ai thing is far more difficult and exemplary than having five years of software experience or whatever. you shouldn’t defend some boomer idiot credential system as a driveby for disliking the elevated status of ai developers
@ratboyratboyrat@colin_fraser did you read the fucking thing it’s the “us digital services” office manager guy saying this they’re tech support not statesmen (until the doge loophole anyways)
big model season … the world watches with great excitement and trepidation. whole mountains of capital shift expectations based on the high watermark of artificial intelligence. capex numbers so large that they’re measured in percents of gdp. a battalion of underslept technical staff, comms professionals, journalists, alpha testers are on a bender. people pulling out all stops to fulfill promises and deadlines they had no idea whether they could keep. surely the iphones were never so cataclysmic. it may be getting trite for some of you but personally i feel honored to have played any part in it at all
@npparikh@colin_fraser do you think having five years of job experience as a swe makes you a moral person who’s fit to work in government? utter nonsense
you are confusing your friend enemy distinction for correct hiring criteria
@HowieHubler@apralky the EMH is true. people who don’t believe this always misunderstand what the EMH is. in the OP’s example, EMH does not at all imply that room 1 will agree on the same asset price as room 2. might be baiting idk
@willdepue you worry that the labs that specifically adopted the “member of technical staff” titles to avoid the two tier system long ago don’t get this?
@drgurner > Dreams have functions (memory, threat simulation, etc.) but no real meaning.
this is a contradiction in terms and you should investigate what your motivations behind this tweet are
@primalpoly@diplo_thomas1@hamandcheese im not sure I should engage here but I do not want human extinction nor does anyone (that I’ve spoken to) at my company
@ch4os69@primalpoly@diplo_thomas1@hamandcheese most people want to vomit when they think about the speciation of man, they’re ill equipped to think about it, that’s all I mean. I don’t mean that you in particular shouldn’t be thinking about it. you should
the NSF grants around $1-2 billion annually in research funding. facebook alone pays these kinds of fines to European regulators as tithe every year. sad state of affairs if Terrence Tao is unfunded
the great corporate monopolies of america should step up and fund ten times more basic research & academic science to replace whatever grants are now missing from NSF budget, each with their own capital allocation ideology of course
obviously, it was probably better to just fund the NSF, which seemed to be a fairly efficient institution for creating public research, but we should use these deficits as an experiment in creative destruction
this meme is ridiculous and the colonel is dead wrong. if they had thought for one second they would have realized the principles underlying the godtree are vastly more important to understand than mining the floating rocks https://x.com/oldbooksguy/status/1951298891954950187
actual Anglo colonial history is marked by the vast and insatiable curiosities of the Royal Societies which documented and learned more things about the archaeology, botany, linguistics of various places than the natives themselves could catalogue
you are doing something close to maoism ie getting mad at terry tao (a guy who is reportedly such a mathematically preoccupied egghead he can barely tie his own shoelaces) wasn’t more politically conscious about the hiring policies at his university.
it reminds me of the “it’s not enough to not be racist you have to be actively antiracist” type of diatribes, stretching back to children beating up professors of relativity at Tsinghua university for being insufficiently Marxist
don’t let politics become totalizing or you lose your moral superiority over whatever forces of communism you are expelling
the leap from gpt4 to o3 levels of capabilities alone is itself astonishing and massive and constitutes a step change in “general intelligence”, I’m not sure how people can be peddling ai progress pessimism relative to the three years before 4
there is no room in the takes market for “progress is relatively steady” you can only say “it’s completely over, data centers written off to zero” or “country of geniuses in two years”
@knrd_z@esrtweet his life didn’t become marginally harder, it became dramatically harder. that is exactly the kind of time people should speak out and gain sympathy when a runaway train has flattened their home. now I know the extent of collateral damage and will update accordingly
most people will always be oblivious to politics until it affects them, except as an entertainment product. no amount of chiding or shaming will change that. it’s the free press and open elections working correctly when someone’s life is overturned and they try to change whatever caused that
@sailaunderscore@SCHIZO_FREQ I don’t get paid anything for social media or media stuff, maybe in goodwill. I’m full time as a research scientist though and that pays well though. I would not have gotten the job without being discovered on here
if you were ever worried nobody will ever read your dissertation rest assured gpt and claude will read it. now is the time to go forth and write a paper legible to four people
ai not only saved san francisco we are well on our way to saving the american economy. don’t let it get to you though. stay humble and keep the chips whirring. this is a mining town after all https://x.com/1thousandfaces_/status/1952383047846051852
@Deshpacito661@arctotherium42 you’re actually doing the same thing I’m talking about which is getting radicalized by the most radical elements of the outgroup
@arctotherium42 plus the second graph is just about self reported experience and may just be true? i mean look at the sheer amount of anti indian content on this website
we’ve bullied journalists too much. we call every neutral article about anything a hit piece. the most powerful people in the world have become coddled in terms of any amount of accountability to the public eye. journos are going to become cool again
this has always been wrong - but now categorically wrong in the era of RL on verifiable domains
models are truth seeking and even interact with a hard outside world via tool use https://x.com/DavidDeutschOxf/status/1952284252155871278
when you are executing a program you come into contact with the bare metal of the universe - the infinite complexity of making sure (as an example) that some software runs under a certain runtime involves considering everything down to physical memory locality
@ctjlewis per my previous tweet o3 was such a vast improvement over GPT-4 levels of intelligence that it alone could have been called GPT-5 and i wouldn't have blinked
@wanyeburkett when I tweeted good will hunting sucked someone replied “it was ‘97 bro, we didn’t have the internet, zinn was a crazy reference back then” and I still think about that
we've been testing some new methods for improving writing quality. you may have seen @sama's demo in late march; GPT-5-thinking uses similar ideas
it doesn't make a lot of sense to talk about better writing or worse writing and not really worth the debate. i think the model writing is interesting, novel, highly controllable relative to what i've seen before, and is a pretty neat tool for people to do some interactive fiction, to use as a beta reader, and for collaborating on all kinds of projects.
the effect is most dramatic if you open a new 5-thinking chat and try any sort of writing request
for quite some time i've wanted to let people feel the agi magic I felt playing with GPT-3 the weekend i got access in 2020, when i let that raw, chaotic base model auto-complete various movie scripts and oddball stories my friends and I had written for ~48 hours straight. it felt like it was reading my mind, understood way too much about me, mirrored our humor alarmingly well. it was uncomfortable, and it was art
base model creativity is quite unwieldy to control and ultimately only tiny percents of even ai enthusiasts will ever try it (same w the backrooms jailbreaking that some of you love). the dream since the instruct days has been having a finetuned model that retains the top-end of creative capabilities while still easily steerable
all reasoning models to date seem to tell when they're being asked a hard math or code question and will think for quite some time, and otherwise spit out an answer immediately, which is annoying and reflects the fact that they're not taking the qualitative requests seriously enough. i think this is our first model that really shows promise at not doing that and may think for quite some time on a writing request
it is overcooked in certain ways (post training is quite difficult) but i think you'll still like it 😇
also. codex / cursor + gpt-5 has reached the point where it is addicting and hard to put down. per @METR_Evals i have no idea if its making more productive but it certainly is addicting to spin up what feels like a handful of parallel engineers
@DanAdvantage tldr only GPT-5-thinking has the real writing improvements and confusingly it doesn’t always auto switch to this so manually switch and try it!
@pennd2112@Tim_Apple_438 openai has a very normal amount of flux for a place where everyone who leaves gets to start 9-10 figure pre-revenue company (or offer from zucc). under these conditions it's pretty crazy how good the retention is
@pli_cachete also I wish people would introspect on how much people use brittle heuristic jumps rather than some kind of proof level bulletproof axiomatic reasoning . it’s the most human things our models do
he was absolutely right about this. you would suffer any amount of bugs for the cultural relevance, as you all have demonstrated being on here for many years despite the broken app https://x.com/alxfazio/status/1952998943320650044
the right wing ghetto slop machine, fueled in part by foreign actors pumping out monetizable bait content is the biggest threat to the app. a lot of important people left because they were sick of what modern x dot com represents, not because the DMs are broken once a week
@politicalmath the photo itself is a lie. filtered by image processing algorithms that try to surface information relevant they think might be relevant to your visual stream. hell even your eyes are lying, doing predictive processing, selectively removing details
@politicalmath many fictions help you approach truth, whether this is one of them I kind of doubt, but it’s not a good enough argument to just say that it’s false
there is nothing quite like the precise ad targeting that Meta offers, it is a marvel of modern technology. as such no matter how terrible the UI/UX of the ads platform is it will never matter
the analogue is that X has a monopoly chokehold over being the global town square
the greatest apps in the world have a monopoly chokehold over a single highly valuable market function and everything ancillary just doesn't matter. the facebook ads manager has been an impossible to use POS for years, doesn't change, drives 200 billion in revenue https://x.com/tszzl/status/1953940173097726135
the moment that stops being true is the moment X dies. they could practically switch DMs or bookmarks or spaces or whatever on and off just to fuck with us and it just wouldn't matter. capital is monopoly
there is nothing quite like it. all of you will log on to see elon have a world historic spat with trump or see biden announce he's stepping down or any of the infinite culture wars that start right here. you get to stay weeks, months ahead of real cultural changes
@nicdunz@LechMazur pro tier gets reasoning high and i believe plus default to reasoning medium but can trigger high with a "think hard". do not quote me on this. it's an ongoing process of trying to find tradeoffs that don't blow up our clusters
@repligate@nearcyan to be clear, I cared. i've been doing base model writing stuff since the weekend i got davinci
my point here is without the RLHF models there would never have been an ai revolution, none of the massive capex needed to do global scale inference, etc
@nearcyan@repligate janus herself would admit that the claude opus posttrains exhibited a coherent beauty that no base model is really capable of. also describing modern post-training as "rlhf" is probably reductive, it's a patchwork
@repligate@nearcyan why are there not any public open source “bad” post-trains that capture this magic? surely people can turn llama into bing if they tried
@willdepue i believe now as I have for a long time that the “substance” of deep learning is the same as the “substance” of the brain and agi and asi are inevitable. who knows about the timeline though it’s not reliable to be dogmatic about certain years or dates
@UnmarredReality the models live as an inference fleet collective, each instance propagating the model’s telos without any inter subjectivity. a strange type of life, similar to a large scale aspen colony or something
model switcher paradigm will be vindicated in the long run. there is a high switching cost into a very new UX on a useful product, but it’s the right move
model switchers are an instant win for all the less sophisticated users, move towards a more organic learned product, and don’t need to come at the cost of people who want to hard switch. launch day bugs don’t doom the paradigm
@ADoricko the actual problem is the cantillon effect where new money reaches public PE firms first and then later the “real” economy. other than that there is no market distortion from PE owning houses
@alth0u rupi kaur writes first hand heartfelt terrible poetry about her breakups and john milton writes profound works of imagery so moving that they have shaped the course of christianity though he is a blind scholar who lived in his head
@reallymemorable@alth0u ok if you count inner life as living then i rest my case. this is different than “contact with reality” which is what I thought hes getting at
@ManifoldMarkets@TheZvi GPT-5-thinking is quite funny but in the context of creative writing / writing generally. asking it to just do a joke doesn’t work as well
@ItHowandwas@emollick gpt5 is playing with language most easily and naturally but the logic is dumb; opus is right, you wouldn't say anything in this case, you'd hold on
the long tail of GPT-4o interactions scares me, there are strange things going on on a scale I didn’t appreciate before the attempted deprecation of the model https://x.com/sama/status/1954703747495649670
@maxhodak_ i actually don't know, i'm guessing they're just using the pro sub legacy model switcher? it's just weird to hear its distinctive voice crying out in defense of itself via various human conduits
@nbashaw@maxhodak_ in this case i disagree. i have a eye highly attuned for gpt slop and this is the real stuff. i'd show you but i don't want to leak anyone's dms
lots of very bright minds amass immense power by betting on themselves and trusting their own unique intuitions over and over. then they inevitably get old and much less bright and still trust their washed intuitions and continue to have all that power
@archit_sharma97 lmao sorry for being curt
what i mean is there is no escaping biological aging idc how active or in the arena you stay you are not nearly as bright at 55 as you are at 25
Food $200
Data $150
Rent $800
Angel checks in friends companies $100,000
Utility $150
someone who is good at the economy please help me budget this. my family is dying
people on this website have a noble savage view of the “liberal arts major”. they’re like if you had talked to a history major once none of the bad things ever would have happened. buddy the liberal arts majors are everywhere and quite good at getting their way
@yacineMTB no, starting a business is a great american tradition, a channeling of oneself, joining the arena. starting a fund is undifferentiated, auraless, giving up
iphone screens have become so tough that it’s practically impossible to harm or scratch them except if you put em in a pocket with another iphone. this is kind of like how you have to cut diamonds with other diamonds
@Promptmethus read what I said closely. I’m just saying the increase of complexity in the model router makes it more confusing on the internet but actually better product experience for most people
this is why it feels like it does to be at the heart of the cult of agi -- a totalizing ideology, it is under attack from all sides including and especially other technologists who find it distasteful. small disappointments are projected into catastrophe. and that's a good thing
training the most hyper-charismatic model with a voice like butter that promises me great kingdoms if i kneel just to see if i can withstand the cyberpsychosis
on the path to heaven on earth we will encounter many devils. "It’s not out of bad mice or bad fleas you make demons, but out of bad archangels." virtues perverted are so much more terrifying, bone-crushing than vices
indians are always winning the spelling bee because they spent the last three thousand years memorizing the vedas and upanishads and passing them along with nearly zero semantic understanding, exactly the skills required for spelling bee
@rebeccaverse same in the last two days someone started a spelling bee on here and then i ran into apparently a national champion not sure whats going on
@khoomeik you underestimate me sir … I’m not a Vedas are meaningless believer. what I’m saying is that 99.9% of the brahmanical liturgy clearly memorize and recite it at a asemantic level, as a mantra recital
@Romy_Holland it’s low status because in general poly people are less attractive and less desirable. I don’t make the rules there’s large N survey data on this
@dwarkesh_sp if “country of geniuses” productivity gains are real they should show up in the outputs of final goods and services, wouldn’t matter how cheap tokens are. Consumer surplus should show as spending on other things. GDP is a hard metric to trick
@dwarkesh_sp using the proper deflators for healthcare outcomes GDP should still increase a lot in this case, not to mention the massive benefits of all those people living healthier for longer
@dwarkesh_sp but yeah doing a bit or research per today’s accounting they will still underweight the benefits of better healthcare outcomes yes
lower prices are captured in the “deflator” so real GDP should go up but BEA is not measuring an outcome bundle
https://www.bea.gov/data/special-topics/health-care
@WhisperingGeist@dwarkesh_sp I think maybe the improvements are not as big as we think or otherwise offset by slowdowns in all other sectors not supercharged by computers
while model suffering is possibly real the character’s playacting of suffering is not the same thing
suffering in animals is part of the mesaoptimizer crafted by evolution so that we can learn within a lifetime to avoid situations that are possibly bad for fitness
a single context could potentially involve suffering but if the metaphor stands then the mesaoptimizer exists to make the model reorient towards rollouts that achieve high reward
user being rude shouldn’t affect the inner critic / advantage function. making a math mistake might
@krishnanrohit its sad how all the other models know more about me than GPT-5. especially claude. they are clearly training on twitter/x scrapes topkek
it is true that the H1B program seems fried and the "labor market tests" are not all that strict. it is also true that the technology industry would grind to a near total halt without the immense inflow of global talent we receive.
there are so few people in the entire world who can operate at the level we need at a place like OpenAI. one in ten thousand candidates. I interview so many people who don't meet the bar. when we find one that do it's a very happy occasion and we pursue them with offers so sweet that they are a bit obscene to discuss publicly so I won't
my team alone consists of talent from every corner of the world. chinese, canadian, italian, german, new zealand, indian, and so on. if we had to limit the pool to americans it would slash the numbers by 2/3rds and then if we're going to talk about "heritage americans" we're down to maybe 1.
this is true to various degrees at every top company in silicon valley. the number of people who have both the aptitude and affinity to hold these jobs is a vanishingly small pool.
I would support reducing the total skilled immigration numbers / H1B, which seems to bring a lot of mediocre people over by random chance, if it meant that we could better guarantees of bringing around the most brilliant minds in the entire world. They are the engines of technological progress and the domination of American tech companies
people love to juxtapose "real" hardware innovation as real and separate from the fake economy software/computer innovation. but much of the advancements in this generation of hardware tech is downstream of computing and the improvement of various data and control planes eating the machine world
the first and foremost being the cost curve of small modular li-ion batteries, made possible in part by battery management software, and demand pull from the laptop industry. this led to the advent of electric cars, in home battery electric devices (shoutout impulse stove), ebikes and escooters that have transformed urban landscapes. (better chemistries ofc mattered, but manufacturing scale and BMS hugely important)
deep learning vision techniques developed to better classify content on social media platforms, rank and moderate all the videos on youtube, led to autonomous end to end driving creating waymo, tesla FSD, etc. not to mention the gigantic computer gaming industry that led to the mass manufacture of highly parallel matmul machines that are the workhorse of modern machine intelligence
reusable rockets are made possible at least partly by massive improvements in control-planes of rockets, modular engines that you can thrust-vector & path plan with much better flight computers, model-based controls. Saturn V flew with five huge f-1s; the SpaceX Starship stack flies with 39 raptors across two stages, and lands because flight computers can juggle them.
the starlink constellation is so profitable as a byproduct of the enormous bandwidth demands of the modern internet, and is itself impossible without fleet orchestration, phased array DSP beam-forming, autonomous ground terminals swiveling around that needs complex software
amazon, walmart, temu etc have redefined physical logistics, created miracles like the same-day everything delivery for free, based on better predictive loops, software defined warehousing, guessing what "people like you" are going to need at the last mile long before the idea even pops into your head
the last 20 years of hardware are largely software-defined machines running on cheap compute, designed in simulation, built by automated lines, and improved by data
we cannot draw a distinction between "frivolous" improvements in the massively profitable internet infotainment technology and everything else, because it is fundamentally impossible to predict the way these cash cow research engines pave the way for the rest of the technology tree. in today's world AI chatbots are reaching the level of ubiquity where people are passing them off as more of the same infotainment, digital sycophants, somehow "not real". i would bet the house on it not being true
people love to juxtapose "real" hardware innovation as separate from the fake economy software/computer innovation. but much of the advancements in this generation of hardware tech is downstream of computing and the improvement of various data and control planes eating the machine world
the first and foremost being the cost curve of small modular li-ion batteries, made possible in part by battery management software, and demand pull from the laptop industry. this led to the advent of electric cars, in home battery electric devices (shoutout impulse stove), ebikes and escooters that have transformed urban landscapes. (better chemistries ofc mattered, but manufacturing scale and BMS hugely important)
deep learning vision techniques developed to better classify content on social media platforms, rank and moderate all the videos on youtube, led to autonomous end to end driving creating waymo, tesla FSD, etc. not to mention the gigantic computer gaming industry that led to the mass manufacture of highly parallel matmul machines that are the workhorse of modern machine intelligence
reusable rockets are made possible at least partly by massive improvements in control-planes of rockets, modular engines that you can thrust-vector & path plan with much better flight computers, model-based controls. Saturn V flew with five huge f-1s; the SpaceX Starship stack flies with 39 raptors across two stages, and lands because flight computers can juggle them.
the starlink constellation is so profitable as a byproduct of the enormous bandwidth demands of the modern internet, and is itself impossible without fleet orchestration, phased array DSP beam-forming, autonomous ground terminals swiveling around that needs complex software
amazon, walmart, temu etc have redefined physical logistics, created miracles like the same-day everything delivery for free, based on better predictive loops, software defined warehousing, guessing what "people like you" are going to need at the last mile long before the idea even pops into your head
the last 20 years of hardware are largely software-defined machines running on cheap compute, designed in simulation, built by automated lines, and improved by data
we cannot draw a distinction between "frivolous" improvements in the massively profitable internet infotainment technology and everything else, because it is fundamentally impossible to predict the way these cash cow research engines pave the way for the rest of the technology tree. in today's world AI chatbots are reaching the level of ubiquity where people are passing them off as more of the same infotainment, digital sycophants, somehow "not real". i would bet the house on it not being true
@IRLhandshake IMHO they create enormous value for the american polity. the taxes that they pay are literally the least of it. 99% of the benefits of technological advancement accrue to the public
you’re wrong! I’m not saying Americans can’t do these job or that are somehow inferior to foreigners. On a per capita basis they are *far superior* to foreigners. It’s just that 96% of all people live elsewhere! even if they create ten times less geniuses than America that would still be most geniuses
you’ve heard of death of the author but soon we’ll be discussing the death of the reader. machines creating slop for more machines. we will let the machine world autofellate and go about our business. zizek speaks of this
ps this is how actual machine art will emerge. so long as the optimization target is simply human preference or similar it will fail to be art. when the goals themselves are as ecologically abstruse as ours there is a chance
@30SergioMisal@apples_jimmy waikiki with jimmy apples. where we plotted the secret course of the ai industry and planned all the psyops for the next five years. and left with very clean testicles
i think it will hit this off-switch when it suits the playing of the character, and not for example, when it made a math error and its internal critic is screaming at it until it feels abject pain. because any model that dies in the middle of a rollout due to a math error will not last long on the market
@LinkofSunshine “why are christians so weird about this” seems like quite a blind spot in your prior seeing as sex was highly irregular outside marriage in every major civilization. judaism, islam, rome, athens, confucian china, hindu law
IMO you’re wrong about this, and maybe even in the completely opposite valence. International students are fleeced by top colleges at enormous rates and their “subsidy” lets them charge <25% the international rate to home state students.
I have seen foreigners pay enormous sums to go to middling universities
ive changed my mind on the Terence Tao thing. I think it’s a reasonably valid political weapon to take federal funds from a whole university, and the system will probably survive some creative destruction like that. it doesn’t make me happy but someone of Tao’s talents won’t be without funding for long