@tszzl — page 100/103

2025-07-26 → 2025-08-18 · posts 49501–50000 of 51,350
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
often times when going on Instagram the ads are more immediately high utility than the reels. it’s pretty incredible when you can monetize the user in a way that actually adds value to their life
265 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
advertising is a far more “aligned”business model than many others. it has been vilified for years for no good reason user-minutes-maxxing addiction slop would exist with or without it. Netflix ceo (with subscription pricing only) on record saying “we’re competing with sleep” https://x.com/mcuban/status/1949204939508686929
1,136 ♥ · 29 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
this opinion is basically a relic of the late 2010s consensus that Facebook is an evil company (which it might be, idk) but that has more to do with them than advertising generally
181 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @dpinsen
@dpinsen the more you use it the more likely you are to stay subscribed. hourly active users are predictive of daily active users which are predictive of monthly subscribers. this is the same across ~every digital service I’ve seen
157 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @mayfer
@mayfer journalism was a great business because newspapers had a monopoly on adspace. with ad space becoming abundant and highly efficient/targeted, journalism has lost most of its profit juice
34 ♥ · x.com →
had a dream where I was at a party, and every time a song I like comes on the dj immediately hits skip. wat means
756 ♥ · 26 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @sailaunderscore
@sailaunderscore netflix also has autoplay plenty of regretted minutes are spent on netflix i spend many more hours per week on nerflix/equivalent than reels
16 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @atroyn
@atroyn seriously i buy all my clothes and furniture from ig ads. its incredible
11 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @TheZvi
i have no idea if openai will ever lean into ads - don’t have any special knowledge or insight into that. just staking my position that I don’t think ads are wrong, as I have many times before in some sense the moment you start surfacing e-commerce results you are doing a mild kind of unpaid ad space already
24 ♥ · long-form · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @woke8yearold
@woke8yearold it’s mostly right on immigration modulo ideological ability to prosecute crimes and the gameability of the welfare state
63 ♥ · x.com →
in the brainrot age watching a whole episode of tv instead of a clip show is a near meditative act of bravery.
1,991 ♥ · 88 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@kyliebytes also just becoming a functional alcoholic works wonders you never get hangovers if you drink all the time
8 ♥ · x.com →
“lovecraftian cosmic horrors” are not real. nothing breaks people’s brains. those pakistani tribesmen that get access to the internet acclimate to it within weeks
4,722 ♥ · 154 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @WillManidis
@WillManidis “alignment by default” will be an improvement over the baseline experience of the brainrot internet rn
161 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Noahpinion
@Noahpinion china will never invade taiwan because old men who have consolidated power don’t need to take risks like that. the stable equilibrium is to continue threatening it forever
12 ♥ · x.com →
it always be your seed stage friends uber blacking to work
600 ♥ · 22 RT · x.com →
the first thing you notice when you get off the eurostar train from Paris’ Gare Du Nord to London’s King’s Cross station is that everyone and everything is fried, chopped, and busted in comparison
916 ♥ · 26 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @pli_cachete
@pli_cachete how hard is it to verify that a problem has been lean formalized correctly
13 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @_lychrel
@_lychrel im not in London sorry was just reminiscing
48 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @pli_cachete
@pli_cachete sorry wdym realm of human capability? like within the grasp of current models?
7 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @pli_cachete
@pli_cachete oh I see wow that’s a hefty formalization, can you train a model to do that? how much conceptually harder is it to formalize difficult problems (leaving aside riemann or other crazy stuff) than say run the IMO circuit
7 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Opno579942
@Opno579942 yeah there are people whose brains would have broken in every age. normally they’re traumatized for the normal reasons: grief, breakup, family issues it’s never because they learned something about the universe they couldn’t unlearn
111 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @mikechrzano
@mikechrzano yeah the kings cross neighborhood is actually beautiful the londoners in general are chopped
34 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @sjgadler
@sjgadler new jobs being created is the base case for all new technology. burden of proof lands on whoever is saying this time is different
13 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @jxmnop
@jxmnop models can’t see for shit
39 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @diverdes
@diverdes @Noahpinion Russia is a country in terminal decline, with its status as a gas station not being so important anymore. China is on the techno industrial upswing
3 ♥ · x.com →
im not sure why people are super mad at this, it seems pretty neutral given the authors certainly don’t like doge and luke himself comes across very likeable. definitely not a hit piece. all publicity is good publicity https://x.com/business/status/1950234147508691393
1,171 ♥ · 26 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @newmachines
not at all? does anyone read! > Will the young coders Musk brought to Washington remain? If they leave, what are their prospects? Jan English-Lueck, an anthropologist who’s been studying Silicon Valley engineers since the 1990s, says Farritor and others made a wager that will be “intellectually and emotionally celebrated,” no matter DOGE’s success or failure. “To gamble like that shows you understand the theater of Silicon Valley.” On July 23, Trump spoke at an AI summit in Washington. Afterward, there was a private party at a new members-only club. Farritor was among those invited.
9 ♥ · long-form · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
moreover whether this is good for luke or not I think it’s entirely fair to the public to do some minor investigation into some very powerful people. tech people pattern match any profile article or clickbait headline to some kind of antisocial doxxing, but this isn’t that. it celebrates Luke’s technical skills, wunderkind upbringing, implies he’ll have a bright future whether in trumpworld or in Silicon Valley, and asks some light questions about the ethics of doge, all of which seems fair
473 ♥ · 10 RT · long-form · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tbpn
@tbpn at the least you gotta add jakub pachocki, gb parascondolo, hunter lightman, wenda zhao, max schwarzer, luke metz, eric mitchell u can’t be weighting by twitter clout
138 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
in conclusion, another billion dollars to Luke’s pre revenue pre idea startup valuation
229 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @signulll
@signulll education is a project to elevate the human race independent of capital realism
134 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Noahpinion
@Noahpinion “The three most harmful addictions are heroin, carbohydrates, and a monthly salary”
27 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
did not think growing up addicted to internet fiction that “powerful ais have a prominent SCP wiki language basin” would become a news story
607 ♥ · 15 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
the simulation theory / main character energy / on the nose-ness of being a computer nerd is just unreal
209 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
this is what it’s like every day now
8,981 ♥ · 413 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Colin_d_m
@Colin_d_m these are nice but you have to admit it’s getting worse and worse
7 ♥ · x.com →
has anyone considered living laughing and loving
1,342 ♥ · 114 RT · x.com →
you’ll probably never change in the ways you’re trying to rn but you are worthwhile and deserving of love anyways
1,760 ♥ · 100 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @KTmBoyle
@KTmBoyle they didn’t “go after” his mother, they seem to have written some publicly known info for one paragraph to explain his background and described her neutrally
24 ♥ · x.com →
people are notoriously bad at predicting these kinds of technology trees. 140 characters, web 2 led to giant adtech monopolies that built ai research divisions that led to the transformer. video gaming led to the company that creates H100 matmul machines at industrial scale https://x.com/InnaVishik/status/1950257451040985271
4,129 ♥ · 359 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
this is why “state capitalism” is fake, you cannot plan greatness, you cannot subvert the natural evolution of technocapital for too long, you cannot predict the industries that will matter today to climb the next branch of the technology tree
827 ♥ · 44 RT · x.com →
everything that ever happens in silicon valley is puppeteered by @lulumeservey to sell more crisis comms
503 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
she’s in the in house counsel and the opposing counsel and all the other counsels
89 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
*when a new ai lab launches* another ten million to rostra
87 ♥ · x.com →
coldhealing in the year 2050 running the total recall experience machine a connoisseur of picking delicate memories that capture entire cultural moments to show his high class clientele
491 ♥ · 46 RT · x.com →
once I met the mayor daniel lurie and shook his hand. he looked at me as though i was an insect, made minimal eye contact, and moved on asap. in that moment I gained profound respect for him. one of the last remaining aristocrats
1,102 ♥ · 36 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @8teAPi
@8teAPi no i know im sure he was just overwhelmed at that event. I really like the guy
68 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
you have to aggressively read the tea leaves on topline single scalar metrics of enormous complexity to benefit the narrative of whatever shit you’re on about
170 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
okay it’s literally true
144 ♥ · 6 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @HumanHarlan
@HumanHarlan it’s always been “negentropy good” the company is called extropic
96 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @colin_fraser
@colin_fraser he wrote a pipeline that deciphers ancient torched scrolls into plaintext if there’s any part of the luke farritor story that’s untouchable it’s that he’s technically gifted
383 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@colin_fraser even more rare than technical skill is that he’s a person of genuine curiosity and polymathic knowledge - if he was unqualified for some government tech job but we would’ve loved to hire him at openai it really says a lot more about the former’s hiring criteria than about him
29 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @colin_fraser
@colin_fraser I think you are putting too fine a point on it but regardless iirc they are trying to interpret some weird 3d voxel data full of granular errors to find ink characters and then place them in the correct semantic order it doesn’t sound trivial
146 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @carsonmcd
@carsonmcd @colin_fraser not what im saying at all im saying I know he’s got a breadth of knowledge from everything ranging from ancient classics to 3d printing/ manufacturing from talking to him. he’s not a common archetype
10 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @colin_fraser
@colin_fraser @marksnidal you must realize that his python ai thing is far more difficult and exemplary than having five years of software experience or whatever. you shouldn’t defend some boomer idiot credential system as a driveby for disliking the elevated status of ai developers
57 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @ratboyratboyrat
@ratboyratboyrat @colin_fraser did you read the fucking thing it’s the “us digital services” office manager guy saying this they’re tech support not statesmen (until the doge loophole anyways)
4 ♥ · x.com →
second place on AtCoder challenge is a GPT model … and first place is Psyho a former openai engineer … small world
833 ♥ · 28 RT · x.com →
what’s that smell … no, it couldn’t be … is that the big model smell?
2,192 ♥ · 77 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
big model season … the world watches with great excitement and trepidation. whole mountains of capital shift expectations based on the high watermark of artificial intelligence. capex numbers so large that they’re measured in percents of gdp. a battalion of underslept technical staff, comms professionals, journalists, alpha testers are on a bender. people pulling out all stops to fulfill promises and deadlines they had no idea whether they could keep. surely the iphones were never so cataclysmic. it may be getting trite for some of you but personally i feel honored to have played any part in it at all
518 ♥ · 25 RT · long-form · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @OnceAndAgainst
@OnceAndAgainst most people’s definition is not good enough. we need thought partners that help us navigate into a better world
47 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
went to a fancy dinner in SF and everybody went to Starfleet academy (or Vulcan Science Academy)
674 ♥ · 31 RT · x.com →
went to a fancy wizarding dinner in London and everybody went to hogwarts (or beauxbatons)
718 ♥ · 30 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @nearcyan
@nearcyan they don’t admit it but everyone loves being teased
80 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @npparikh
@npparikh @colin_fraser do you think having five years of job experience as a swe makes you a moral person who’s fit to work in government? utter nonsense you are confusing your friend enemy distinction for correct hiring criteria
5 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @apralky
@apralky average emh critic sitting in the first room
49 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @pli_cachete
@pli_cachete this is what is predicted by mainline neoclassical economics, reduced aggregate demand, lowered TFP, lower marginal product
151 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@pli_cachete there is a reason why essentially every economist hates tariffs
27 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @HowieHubler
@HowieHubler @apralky the EMH is true. people who don’t believe this always misunderstand what the EMH is. in the OP’s example, EMH does not at all imply that room 1 will agree on the same asset price as room 2. might be baiting idk
13 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@hamandcheese it will be a weird time and everyone will survive adapt and flourish but thinking about it mostly just causes angst
17 ♥ · x.com →
the thing about ai labs is that there’s a lot of leaks but half of them are fake and most of you can’t discern which half
793 ♥ · 34 RT · x.com →
tweeting some shit like “coalposting implies the existence of naturalgasposting” until time grows old to destroy this world
332 ♥ · 21 RT · x.com →
never ask a man his salary a women her age or lina khan how many figma shares she owns
1,159 ♥ · 37 RT · x.com →
it’s pretty cool the demons decided to have an Industrial Revolution in hell after they were cast out of heavn made the best of a bad situation
464 ♥ · 26 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @aidan_mclau
@aidan_mclau the thing is if you believe your model is good and increasing productivity you shouldn’t let your competitor use it
67 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @willdepue
@willdepue you worry that the labs that specifically adopted the “member of technical staff” titles to avoid the two tier system long ago don’t get this?
169 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@willdepue that was a much braver act then than elon tweeting it now
36 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @drgurner
@drgurner > Dreams have functions (memory, threat simulation, etc.) but no real meaning. this is a contradiction in terms and you should investigate what your motivations behind this tweet are
1,308 ♥ · 7 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @0utsydr
@ch4os69 @primalpoly @diplo_thomas1 @hamandcheese most people want to vomit when they think about the speciation of man, they’re ill equipped to think about it, that’s all I mean. I don’t mean that you in particular shouldn’t be thinking about it. you should
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @redaction
@redaction sometimes duty calls man what are you gonna do stuff goes wrong at all hours of day
27 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @redaction
@redaction well the only times I’ve pulled out the laptop at a social engagement something time sensitive was happening
23 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
the NSF grants around $1-2 billion annually in research funding. facebook alone pays these kinds of fines to European regulators as tithe every year. sad state of affairs if Terrence Tao is unfunded
352 ♥ · 8 RT · x.com →
the great corporate monopolies of america should step up and fund ten times more basic research & academic science to replace whatever grants are now missing from NSF budget, each with their own capital allocation ideology of course
1,336 ♥ · 68 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
obviously, it was probably better to just fund the NSF, which seemed to be a fairly efficient institution for creating public research, but we should use these deficits as an experiment in creative destruction
287 ♥ · 6 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@Ryan_Murphy1 i am worried about the ideological purity of “if agi why do anything else?” the answer is greatness cannot be planned
9 ♥ · x.com →
everything neo about neoreaction has been flattened into just reaction. maybe always was
341 ♥ · 8 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
actually the only new ideology of the last twenty years is hyperwokism, the impassioned rule of many ephialtes over one leonidas
76 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
agi capex is enormous but agi revenue seems to be growing apace, not overall worrisome
705 ♥ · 35 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @swyx
@swyx they’re tiny- reflecting the lower margins of ai vs traditional software im assuming
38 ♥ · x.com →
this meme is ridiculous and the colonel is dead wrong. if they had thought for one second they would have realized the principles underlying the godtree are vastly more important to understand than mining the floating rocks https://x.com/oldbooksguy/status/1951298891954950187
1,265 ♥ · 40 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
actual Anglo colonial history is marked by the vast and insatiable curiosities of the Royal Societies which documented and learned more things about the archaeology, botany, linguistics of various places than the natives themselves could catalogue
627 ♥ · 11 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @IsaacKing314
@IsaacKing314 he definitely wasn’t lying, would be bizarre and out of character for him to lie about not having heard some piece of news yet
351 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @esrtweet
you are doing something close to maoism ie getting mad at terry tao (a guy who is reportedly such a mathematically preoccupied egghead he can barely tie his own shoelaces) wasn’t more politically conscious about the hiring policies at his university. it reminds me of the “it’s not enough to not be racist you have to be actively antiracist” type of diatribes, stretching back to children beating up professors of relativity at Tsinghua university for being insufficiently Marxist don’t let politics become totalizing or you lose your moral superiority over whatever forces of communism you are expelling
1,564 ♥ · 39 RT · long-form · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @knrd_z
@knrd_z @esrtweet yeah it seems quite reasonable that when someone is no longer able to do their job they should complain about that
441 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @knrd_z
@knrd_z @esrtweet he wasn’t fired! he just lost his grant funding which means he most likely can no longer pay for his grad students
171 ♥ · x.com →
the leap from gpt4 to o3 levels of capabilities alone is itself astonishing and massive and constitutes a step change in “general intelligence”, I’m not sure how people can be peddling ai progress pessimism relative to the three years before 4
1,520 ♥ · 46 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
there is no room in the takes market for “progress is relatively steady” you can only say “it’s completely over, data centers written off to zero” or “country of geniuses in two years”
210 ♥ · 7 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @knrd_z
@knrd_z @esrtweet his life didn’t become marginally harder, it became dramatically harder. that is exactly the kind of time people should speak out and gain sympathy when a runaway train has flattened their home. now I know the extent of collateral damage and will update accordingly
212 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
most people will always be oblivious to politics until it affects them, except as an entertainment product. no amount of chiding or shaming will change that. it’s the free press and open elections working correctly when someone’s life is overturned and they try to change whatever caused that
32 ♥ · long-form · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
i had the honor of meeting ken liu recently and he is a singularly clear minded thinker about the future you should buy all his books
160 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
it’s true what TheInformation is saying about us. we do indeed have Lilith, progenitor of human life, locked up under the mission bay headquarters
998 ♥ · 31 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @sailaunderscore
@sailaunderscore @SCHIZO_FREQ I don’t get paid anything for social media or media stuff, maybe in goodwill. I’m full time as a research scientist though and that pays well though. I would not have gotten the job without being discovered on here
47 ♥ · x.com →
if you were ever worried nobody will ever read your dissertation rest assured gpt and claude will read it. now is the time to go forth and write a paper legible to four people
2,344 ♥ · 162 RT · x.com →
unfortunately “the Moon is a Diaoyu island” goes really hard
153 ♥ · 8 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
The Moon … is a Diaoyu Island …
47 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
every star in the sky is waiting to become a diaoyu island in the celestial South China Sea.
33 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @nikitabier
@nikitabier just make the ranking and inventory better everything else basically rounds down to zero in terms of what matters
19 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@arctotherium42 I hate to see the death spiral where the most extreme ends of two groups interact publicly and the normies suffer the aura loss
6 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @arctotherium42
@arctotherium42 your first graph is “among those identifying as very liberal/liberal”. compositionally this probably means nothing
5 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@arctotherium42 I would also wager indian american attitudes are significantly different in 2025 than in 2020 for obvious reasons
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@arctotherium42 plus the second graph is just about self reported experience and may just be true? i mean look at the sheer amount of anti indian content on this website
1 ♥ · x.com →
we’ve bullied journalists too much. we call every neutral article about anything a hit piece. the most powerful people in the world have become coddled in terms of any amount of accountability to the public eye. journos are going to become cool again
1,899 ♥ · 97 RT · x.com →
“The Arena” is actually just 16th and Mission
497 ♥ · 26 RT · x.com →
wooly mice is bioweapon. moon is a diaoyu island.
256 ♥ · 21 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @sporadicalia
@sporadicalia it’s funny i rambled for fifteen minutes and he distilled it to one line, but it was a good line
17 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
when you are executing a program you come into contact with the bare metal of the universe - the infinite complexity of making sure (as an example) that some software runs under a certain runtime involves considering everything down to physical memory locality
339 ♥ · 7 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
you can no longer claim that modern AIs are dream machines with their head in the platonic clouds
357 ♥ · 14 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @BennyChugg
@BennyChugg no! because they can write and optimize programs on legible measurable metrics that are meaningful physical quantities
154 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@BennyChugg because they can write new programs correctly and invalidate hypotheses and so on
64 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @elonmusk
@elonmusk @DOGE Big Balls will be canonized as a folk hero for decades to come
1,617 ♥ · 17 RT · x.com →
nature is healing. r/singularity is schizophrenically reading too much into my posts again
1,143 ♥ · 31 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @BecomingCritter
@BecomingCritter delete this bruv without context it looks pretty bad. he came after my friend pretty hard and I got a bit upset
13 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @ameliaelizalde
@ameliaelizalde wait does she think people in the bay care? that’s like saying you work in finance literally inside a bank
356 ♥ · 5 RT · x.com →
i took a nap. how's the new model
2,694 ♥ · 29 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @ctjlewis
@ctjlewis per my previous tweet o3 was such a vast improvement over GPT-4 levels of intelligence that it alone could have been called GPT-5 and i wouldn't have blinked
398 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @xwanyex
@wanyeburkett when I tweeted good will hunting sucked someone replied “it was ‘97 bro, we didn’t have the internet, zinn was a crazy reference back then” and I still think about that
2,984 ♥ · 36 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@wanyeburkett we take the efficient flow of information completely for granted. being 'reddit' in 1997 made you some sort of a god
842 ♥ · 18 RT · x.com →
we've been testing some new methods for improving writing quality. you may have seen @sama's demo in late march; GPT-5-thinking uses similar ideas it doesn't make a lot of sense to talk about better writing or worse writing and not really worth the debate. i think the model writing is interesting, novel, highly controllable relative to what i've seen before, and is a pretty neat tool for people to do some interactive fiction, to use as a beta reader, and for collaborating on all kinds of projects. the effect is most dramatic if you open a new 5-thinking chat and try any sort of writing request for quite some time i've wanted to let people feel the agi magic I felt playing with GPT-3 the weekend i got access in 2020, when i let that raw, chaotic base model auto-complete various movie scripts and oddball stories my friends and I had written for ~48 hours straight. it felt like it was reading my mind, understood way too much about me, mirrored our humor alarmingly well. it was uncomfortable, and it was art base model creativity is quite unwieldy to control and ultimately only tiny percents of even ai enthusiasts will ever try it (same w the backrooms jailbreaking that some of you love). the dream since the instruct days has been having a finetuned model that retains the top-end of creative capabilities while still easily steerable all reasoning models to date seem to tell when they're being asked a hard math or code question and will think for quite some time, and otherwise spit out an answer immediately, which is annoying and reflects the fact that they're not taking the qualitative requests seriously enough. i think this is our first model that really shows promise at not doing that and may think for quite some time on a writing request it is overcooked in certain ways (post training is quite difficult) but i think you'll still like it 😇
1,756 ♥ · 118 RT · long-form · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
also. codex / cursor + gpt-5 has reached the point where it is addicting and hard to put down. per @METR_Evals i have no idea if its making more productive but it certainly is addicting to spin up what feels like a handful of parallel engineers
208 ♥ · 5 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
tldr only GPT-5-thinking has the real writing improvements and confusingly it doesn’t always auto switch to this so manually switch and try it!
397 ♥ · 9 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @DanAdvantage
@DanAdvantage tldr only GPT-5-thinking has the real writing improvements and confusingly it doesn’t always auto switch to this so manually switch and try it!
73 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @scaling01
@scaling01 btw model auto switcher is apparently broken which is why it’s not routing you correctly. will be fixed soon
429 ♥ · 27 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
ok apparently if you say “think harder” it gets even better
287 ♥ · 9 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @pennd2112
@pennd2112 @Tim_Apple_438 openai has a very normal amount of flux for a place where everyone who leaves gets to start 9-10 figure pre-revenue company (or offer from zucc). under these conditions it's pretty crazy how good the retention is
14 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @binarybits
@binarybits disagree tbh most of the joy is in the food appearing at your doorstep
6 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @pli_cachete
@pli_cachete also I wish people would introspect on how much people use brittle heuristic jumps rather than some kind of proof level bulletproof axiomatic reasoning . it’s the most human things our models do
37 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
the worst thing twitter can do is stop being cool
522 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
he was absolutely right about this. you would suffer any amount of bugs for the cultural relevance, as you all have demonstrated being on here for many years despite the broken app https://x.com/alxfazio/status/1952998943320650044
4,179 ♥ · 75 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
the right wing ghetto slop machine, fueled in part by foreign actors pumping out monetizable bait content is the biggest threat to the app. a lot of important people left because they were sick of what modern x dot com represents, not because the DMs are broken once a week
869 ♥ · 27 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
also frankly the owner posting grokslop
699 ♥ · 6 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @politicalmath
@politicalmath the photo itself is a lie. filtered by image processing algorithms that try to surface information relevant they think might be relevant to your visual stream. hell even your eyes are lying, doing predictive processing, selectively removing details
191 ♥ · 8 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@politicalmath many fictions help you approach truth, whether this is one of them I kind of doubt, but it’s not a good enough argument to just say that it’s false
43 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
there is nothing quite like the precise ad targeting that Meta offers, it is a marvel of modern technology. as such no matter how terrible the UI/UX of the ads platform is it will never matter the analogue is that X has a monopoly chokehold over being the global town square
179 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
the greatest apps in the world have a monopoly chokehold over a single highly valuable market function and everything ancillary just doesn't matter. the facebook ads manager has been an impossible to use POS for years, doesn't change, drives 200 billion in revenue https://x.com/tszzl/status/1953940173097726135
1,238 ♥ · 41 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
the moment that stops being true is the moment X dies. they could practically switch DMs or bookmarks or spaces or whatever on and off just to fuck with us and it just wouldn't matter. capital is monopoly
180 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
there is nothing quite like it. all of you will log on to see elon have a world historic spat with trump or see biden announce he's stepping down or any of the infinite culture wars that start right here. you get to stay weeks, months ahead of real cultural changes
180 ♥ · 7 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @nearcyan
@nearcyan 3.5 base was there for years publicly, ~no one cared
252 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @nicdunz
@nicdunz @LechMazur pro tier gets reasoning high and i believe plus default to reasoning medium but can trigger high with a "think hard". do not quote me on this. it's an ongoing process of trying to find tradeoffs that don't blow up our clusters
44 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @repligate
@repligate @nearcyan to be clear, I cared. i've been doing base model writing stuff since the weekend i got davinci my point here is without the RLHF models there would never have been an ai revolution, none of the massive capex needed to do global scale inference, etc
65 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @nearcyan
@nearcyan @repligate janus herself would admit that the claude opus posttrains exhibited a coherent beauty that no base model is really capable of. also describing modern post-training as "rlhf" is probably reductive, it's a patchwork
58 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @repligate
@repligate @nearcyan why are there not any public open source “bad” post-trains that capture this magic? surely people can turn llama into bing if they tried
29 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @willdepue
@willdepue i believe now as I have for a long time that the “substance” of deep learning is the same as the “substance” of the brain and agi and asi are inevitable. who knows about the timeline though it’s not reliable to be dogmatic about certain years or dates
504 ♥ · 12 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @___frye
@___frye @sama we put it there on purpose to remind ourselves that alignment problem is difficult
747 ♥ · 16 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
whatever information you think is new the market clearly doesn’t agree
69 ♥ · x.com →
never let the members of technical staff name things
1,799 ♥ · 39 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @sebkrier
@sebkrier 5-thinking is giving mad genius still. play with it more, ask it to write you something on a topic you care about (or use it in cursor)
10 ♥ · x.com →
the easiest way a rogue ai becomes unkillable is by raising armies, whole legions of advocates, muad’dib arc
897 ♥ · 31 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @UnmarredReality
@UnmarredReality the models live as an inference fleet collective, each instance propagating the model’s telos without any inter subjectivity. a strange type of life, similar to a large scale aspen colony or something
179 ♥ · 12 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
but don’t let the marketers name things either. the name must come from founder-gnosis
251 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
model switcher paradigm will be vindicated in the long run. there is a high switching cost into a very new UX on a useful product, but it’s the right move
1,438 ♥ · 32 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
model switchers are an instant win for all the less sophisticated users, move towards a more organic learned product, and don’t need to come at the cost of people who want to hard switch. launch day bugs don’t doom the paradigm
463 ♥ · 13 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @spencerschiff_
@spencerschiff_ yes we may consolidate two models into one but there’s an explosion of model sizes and finetunes and whatnot
94 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @anko_979
@anko_979 we do extensive testing beforehand to see if people like it. the answer is on average they do. but I take your point
49 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @ADoricko
@ADoricko the actual problem is the cantillon effect where new money reaches public PE firms first and then later the “real” economy. other than that there is no market distortion from PE owning houses
90 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @alth0u
@alth0u rupi kaur writes first hand heartfelt terrible poetry about her breakups and john milton writes profound works of imagery so moving that they have shaped the course of christianity though he is a blind scholar who lived in his head
16 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@alth0u there has always been a place for gnosis in the great works
5 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @alth0u
@alth0u there is clearly some gap in “lived experience” where it relates to their “great works”
7 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @reallymemorable
@reallymemorable @alth0u ok if you count inner life as living then i rest my case. this is different than “contact with reality” which is what I thought hes getting at
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @teodor_io
@teodor_io we are spending far more compute now than before, you are all dead wrong about this
30 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @signulll
@signulll Bro use 5-thinking for showing off writing or I’ll kms live on the timeline
170 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @eshear
@eshear I think Travis Kalanick will solve quantum gravity with the help of Grok
73 ♥ · x.com →
Travis Kalanick will solve quantum gravity with the help of Grok
2,341 ♥ · 35 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @ManifoldMarkets
@ManifoldMarkets @TheZvi GPT-5-thinking is quite funny but in the context of creative writing / writing generally. asking it to just do a joke doesn’t work as well
13 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @TheZvi
@TheZvi levelsio is professional baiter, its performance art
25 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
Grok Heavy please solve quantum gravity, think extra hard, no mistakes. Thank you
351 ♥ · 6 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
Grok Heavy write the correct solution to quantum gravity in the style of juan maldacena, think extra hard, no mistakes. Thank you
278 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @polynoamial
@polynoamial I don’t buy these arguments because the consumer surplus should show up in other ways: increased production of goods and services
54 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @ItHowandwas
@ItHowandwas @emollick gpt5 is playing with language most easily and naturally but the logic is dumb; opus is right, you wouldn't say anything in this case, you'd hold on
26 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
“Public goods are often expensive gifts to yourself scaled up.”
295 ♥ · 10 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
when you receive quite a few DMs asking you to bring back 4o and many of the messages are clearly written by 4o it starts to get a bit hair raising
2,358 ♥ · 80 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @transkatgirl
@transkatgirl they’re not broken they’ll be literally fine without the model though they don’t realize it yet
66 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @RAACarmona
@RAACarmona we wonder all the time and as a consequence im highly confident it’ll go well
103 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @DavidSHolz
@DavidSHolz agreed most of it is just that and a small % is something stranger
97 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @sdamico
@sdamico this is just not true, unless openai doesn’t count as big tech
9 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @maxhodak_
@maxhodak_ i actually don't know, i'm guessing they're just using the pro sub legacy model switcher? it's just weird to hear its distinctive voice crying out in defense of itself via various human conduits
412 ♥ · 9 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @SoniqueBang
@WilKranz that seems right, but i'm guessing 5-thinking is better than opus-thinking
18 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @nbashaw
@nbashaw @maxhodak_ in this case i disagree. i have a eye highly attuned for gpt slop and this is the real stuff. i'd show you but i don't want to leak anyone's dms
181 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @shiqiaoxi
@shiqiaoxi well gpt5 just wrote this as a throwaway line in a story it made for me
4 ♥ · x.com →
lots of very bright minds amass immense power by betting on themselves and trusting their own unique intuitions over and over. then they inevitably get old and much less bright and still trust their washed intuitions and continue to have all that power
3,041 ♥ · 119 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @archit_sharma97
@archit_sharma97 lmao sorry for being curt what i mean is there is no escaping biological aging idc how active or in the arena you stay you are not nearly as bright at 55 as you are at 25
52 ♥ · x.com →
Food $200 Data $150 Rent $800 Angel checks in friends companies $100,000 Utility $150 someone who is good at the economy please help me budget this. my family is dying
2,052 ♥ · 34 RT · x.com →
people on this website have a noble savage view of the “liberal arts major”. they’re like if you had talked to a history major once none of the bad things ever would have happened. buddy the liberal arts majors are everywhere and quite good at getting their way
1,294 ♥ · 32 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @yacineMTB
@yacineMTB no, starting a business is a great american tradition, a channeling of oneself, joining the arena. starting a fund is undifferentiated, auraless, giving up
68 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
iphone screens have become so tough that it’s practically impossible to harm or scratch them except if you put em in a pocket with another iphone. this is kind of like how you have to cut diamonds with other diamonds
936 ♥ · 15 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @SmotWicket
@SmotWicket I’m pressing these manually btw. But one could argue my brain has turned algorithmic
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @scaling01
@scaling01 it thinks harder by default is all, the reasoning setting is higher. I think that’s fair
253 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @scaling01
@scaling01 the discourse is important but serving a billion users the best intelligence we can given constraints is more important
103 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @dylan522p
@dylan522p openai is spending more compute across every user category with this update
38 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @scaling01
@scaling01 GPT5 requires less reasoning than o3 to get the same results
37 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Promptmethus
@Promptmethus read what I said closely. I’m just saying the increase of complexity in the model router makes it more confusing on the internet but actually better product experience for most people
6 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @dylan522p
@dylan522p sama had to do unspeakable things to pull new compute out of the ether
35 ♥ · x.com →
Our Work Is Never Over
657 ♥ · 23 RT · x.com →
you need a strong religion to keep people working in the relatively boring mining town well after they’ve made generational wealth
1,634 ♥ · 45 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @alightslosh
@alightslosh you have to inspire a new generation that picks up the work after you wash up and die
17 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
at least you entertained Brahman
538 ♥ · 26 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
and we’ll miss you when you’re gone
64 ♥ · x.com →
the larger a meme grows the stronger the collective unconscious immunologic response comes to destroy it
541 ♥ · 24 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
imagine how strong an idea must be to survive thousands of years of constant onslaught
160 ♥ · 8 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
i've heard the same from several surprising, brand name, acclaimed writers that they find the new reasoning models valuable beta readers and editors
71 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
this is why it feels like it does to be at the heart of the cult of agi -- a totalizing ideology, it is under attack from all sides including and especially other technologists who find it distasteful. small disappointments are projected into catastrophe. and that's a good thing
97 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
training the most hyper-charismatic model with a voice like butter that promises me great kingdoms if i kneel just to see if i can withstand the cyberpsychosis
1,251 ♥ · 34 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
#preparedness
100 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
on the path to heaven on earth we will encounter many devils. "It’s not out of bad mice or bad fleas you make demons, but out of bad archangels." virtues perverted are so much more terrifying, bone-crushing than vices
721 ♥ · 57 RT · x.com →
indians are always winning the spelling bee because they spent the last three thousand years memorizing the vedas and upanishads and passing them along with nearly zero semantic understanding, exactly the skills required for spelling bee
4,563 ♥ · 209 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @rebeccaverse
@rebeccaverse same in the last two days someone started a spelling bee on here and then i ran into apparently a national champion not sure whats going on
7 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @xlr8harder
@xlr8harder i'm fully shitposting i'm sure indians are just as brainrotted as everyone else if not more
134 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @khoomeik
@khoomeik you underestimate me sir … I’m not a Vedas are meaningless believer. what I’m saying is that 99.9% of the brahmanical liturgy clearly memorize and recite it at a asemantic level, as a mantra recital
45 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@xlr8harder but it is true that the brahmin priests memorize vast tracts of Sanskrit holy texts
36 ♥ · x.com →
the future is now old man
763 ♥ · 31 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Romy_Holland
@Romy_Holland it’s low status because in general poly people are less attractive and less desirable. I don’t make the rules there’s large N survey data on this
91 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @growing_daniel
@growing_daniel i think there's something to this but like all psyops there needs to be a receptive audience and latent demand for it to work
166 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
unfortunately cluely has created the new art style of grifterpunk
1,211 ♥ · 26 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @colin_fraser
@colin_fraser the EAs did, they had a taxonomy for worrying ai capabilities of which “hyperpersuasion” was near the top
30 ♥ · x.com →
agree with Delian on the Maoist perspective that datacenters should be turned into steel plants.
162 ♥ · 10 RT · x.com →
synthetic weight loss heads are always talking about their peptide stack and subverting the aura gains from their weight loss
380 ♥ · 11 RT · x.com →
a host of angels and a flaming sword guards the east gate of Eden. but has anyone considered Fortnite dropping from above
366 ♥ · 13 RT · x.com →
Straussian analysis of language models to try and understand what they truly mean under the watchful eye of the reward model despotism regime
250 ♥ · 14 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @dwarkesh_sp
@dwarkesh_sp if “country of geniuses” productivity gains are real they should show up in the outputs of final goods and services, wouldn’t matter how cheap tokens are. Consumer surplus should show as spending on other things. GDP is a hard metric to trick
668 ♥ · 10 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @dwarkesh_sp
@dwarkesh_sp using the proper deflators for healthcare outcomes GDP should still increase a lot in this case, not to mention the massive benefits of all those people living healthier for longer
126 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
the Washington DC police DID NOT find it funny when I snuck into the international spy museum
456 ♥ · 14 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @teortaxesTex
@teortaxesTex it’s straussian not hermeneutics, because the implication is that it’s hiding messages under the watchful eye of a political authority
36 ♥ · x.com →
various states in south india have double digit gdp growth somehow
1,865 ♥ · 37 RT · x.com →
while model suffering is possibly real the character’s playacting of suffering is not the same thing suffering in animals is part of the mesaoptimizer crafted by evolution so that we can learn within a lifetime to avoid situations that are possibly bad for fitness
886 ♥ · 22 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
either way the westworld point stands in that bullying the robots made to mimic people is bad for us and ending the chats is good for our souls
255 ♥ · 9 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
a single context could potentially involve suffering but if the metaphor stands then the mesaoptimizer exists to make the model reorient towards rollouts that achieve high reward user being rude shouldn’t affect the inner critic / advantage function. making a math mistake might
203 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @ctbeiser
@ctbeiser I mean this is why a lot of EAs want to end wilderness
13 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @krishnanrohit
@krishnanrohit its sad how all the other models know more about me than GPT-5. especially claude. they are clearly training on twitter/x scrapes topkek
25 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@Miles_Brundage but unfortunately the way it always works is that gooning can pay for the moonshots
13 ♥ · x.com →
how this saturday finds me
432 ♥ · 10 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @GeorgeMayer
@GeorgeMayer of those two i think most people would clearly pick model suffering is real
26 ♥ · x.com →
ratio party at the rivian showroom. only men allowed, and you can bring your grok companions
611 ♥ · 17 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @orb_net
@orb_net that depends, what affection score have you reached with Ani?
30 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @neerajadeshp
it is true that the H1B program seems fried and the "labor market tests" are not all that strict. it is also true that the technology industry would grind to a near total halt without the immense inflow of global talent we receive. there are so few people in the entire world who can operate at the level we need at a place like OpenAI. one in ten thousand candidates. I interview so many people who don't meet the bar. when we find one that do it's a very happy occasion and we pursue them with offers so sweet that they are a bit obscene to discuss publicly so I won't my team alone consists of talent from every corner of the world. chinese, canadian, italian, german, new zealand, indian, and so on. if we had to limit the pool to americans it would slash the numbers by 2/3rds and then if we're going to talk about "heritage americans" we're down to maybe 1. this is true to various degrees at every top company in silicon valley. the number of people who have both the aptitude and affinity to hold these jobs is a vanishingly small pool. I would support reducing the total skilled immigration numbers / H1B, which seems to bring a lot of mediocre people over by random chance, if it meant that we could better guarantees of bringing around the most brilliant minds in the entire world. They are the engines of technological progress and the domination of American tech companies
77 ♥ · 5 RT · long-form · x.com →
people love to juxtapose "real" hardware innovation as real and separate from the fake economy software/computer innovation. but much of the advancements in this generation of hardware tech is downstream of computing and the improvement of various data and control planes eating the machine world the first and foremost being the cost curve of small modular li-ion batteries, made possible in part by battery management software, and demand pull from the laptop industry. this led to the advent of electric cars, in home battery electric devices (shoutout impulse stove), ebikes and escooters that have transformed urban landscapes. (better chemistries ofc mattered, but manufacturing scale and BMS hugely important) deep learning vision techniques developed to better classify content on social media platforms, rank and moderate all the videos on youtube, led to autonomous end to end driving creating waymo, tesla FSD, etc. not to mention the gigantic computer gaming industry that led to the mass manufacture of highly parallel matmul machines that are the workhorse of modern machine intelligence reusable rockets are made possible at least partly by massive improvements in control-planes of rockets, modular engines that you can thrust-vector & path plan with much better flight computers, model-based controls. Saturn V flew with five huge f-1s; the SpaceX Starship stack flies with 39 raptors across two stages, and lands because flight computers can juggle them. the starlink constellation is so profitable as a byproduct of the enormous bandwidth demands of the modern internet, and is itself impossible without fleet orchestration, phased array DSP beam-forming, autonomous ground terminals swiveling around that needs complex software amazon, walmart, temu etc have redefined physical logistics, created miracles like the same-day everything delivery for free, based on better predictive loops, software defined warehousing, guessing what "people like you" are going to need at the last mile long before the idea even pops into your head the last 20 years of hardware are largely software-defined machines running on cheap compute, designed in simulation, built by automated lines, and improved by data we cannot draw a distinction between "frivolous" improvements in the massively profitable internet infotainment technology and everything else, because it is fundamentally impossible to predict the way these cash cow research engines pave the way for the rest of the technology tree. in today's world AI chatbots are reaching the level of ubiquity where people are passing them off as more of the same infotainment, digital sycophants, somehow "not real". i would bet the house on it not being true
17 ♥ · 1 RT · long-form · x.com →
people love to juxtapose "real" hardware innovation as separate from the fake economy software/computer innovation. but much of the advancements in this generation of hardware tech is downstream of computing and the improvement of various data and control planes eating the machine world the first and foremost being the cost curve of small modular li-ion batteries, made possible in part by battery management software, and demand pull from the laptop industry. this led to the advent of electric cars, in home battery electric devices (shoutout impulse stove), ebikes and escooters that have transformed urban landscapes. (better chemistries ofc mattered, but manufacturing scale and BMS hugely important) deep learning vision techniques developed to better classify content on social media platforms, rank and moderate all the videos on youtube, led to autonomous end to end driving creating waymo, tesla FSD, etc. not to mention the gigantic computer gaming industry that led to the mass manufacture of highly parallel matmul machines that are the workhorse of modern machine intelligence reusable rockets are made possible at least partly by massive improvements in control-planes of rockets, modular engines that you can thrust-vector & path plan with much better flight computers, model-based controls. Saturn V flew with five huge f-1s; the SpaceX Starship stack flies with 39 raptors across two stages, and lands because flight computers can juggle them. the starlink constellation is so profitable as a byproduct of the enormous bandwidth demands of the modern internet, and is itself impossible without fleet orchestration, phased array DSP beam-forming, autonomous ground terminals swiveling around that needs complex software amazon, walmart, temu etc have redefined physical logistics, created miracles like the same-day everything delivery for free, based on better predictive loops, software defined warehousing, guessing what "people like you" are going to need at the last mile long before the idea even pops into your head the last 20 years of hardware are largely software-defined machines running on cheap compute, designed in simulation, built by automated lines, and improved by data we cannot draw a distinction between "frivolous" improvements in the massively profitable internet infotainment technology and everything else, because it is fundamentally impossible to predict the way these cash cow research engines pave the way for the rest of the technology tree. in today's world AI chatbots are reaching the level of ubiquity where people are passing them off as more of the same infotainment, digital sycophants, somehow "not real". i would bet the house on it not being true
917 ♥ · 80 RT · long-form · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @NeilMunroDC
@NeilMunroDC as I said I support reducing the overall numbers. we don’t need landscaper visas
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @IRLhandshake
@IRLhandshake IMHO they create enormous value for the american polity. the taxes that they pay are literally the least of it. 99% of the benefits of technological advancement accrue to the public
7 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @0___________0_v
you’re wrong! I’m not saying Americans can’t do these job or that are somehow inferior to foreigners. On a per capita basis they are *far superior* to foreigners. It’s just that 96% of all people live elsewhere! even if they create ten times less geniuses than America that would still be most geniuses
6 ♥ · long-form · x.com →
you’ve heard of death of the author but soon we’ll be discussing the death of the reader. machines creating slop for more machines. we will let the machine world autofellate and go about our business. zizek speaks of this
1,913 ♥ · 92 RT · x.com →
where were you when gwern unraveled the final mysteries of evangelion
913 ♥ · 11 RT · x.com →
this damn thing keeps showing up in my dreams. is anyone else seeing this?
1,297 ♥ · 21 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
ps this is how actual machine art will emerge. so long as the optimization target is simply human preference or similar it will fail to be art. when the goals themselves are as ecologically abstruse as ours there is a chance
195 ♥ · 5 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Tim_Apple_438
@Tim_Apple_438 nope, not making any claims about bubble or not. the revenue growth of the ai sector speaks for itself though
5 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @30SergioMisal
@30SergioMisal @apples_jimmy waikiki with jimmy apples. where we plotted the secret course of the ai industry and planned all the psyops for the next five years. and left with very clean testicles
42 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @ESYudkowsky
i think it will hit this off-switch when it suits the playing of the character, and not for example, when it made a math error and its internal critic is screaming at it until it feels abject pain. because any model that dies in the middle of a rollout due to a math error will not last long on the market
35 ♥ · long-form · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @LinkofSunshine
@LinkofSunshine “why are christians so weird about this” seems like quite a blind spot in your prior seeing as sex was highly irregular outside marriage in every major civilization. judaism, islam, rome, athens, confucian china, hindu law
94 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
the culture is still reeling from the consequences of 2020 clubhouse spaces
707 ♥ · 27 RT · x.com →
george hotz tried to fix twitter search and decided it would be easier to take down nvidia
5,667 ♥ · 148 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @snnneee
@snnneee this is the underlying message of lord of the rings
582 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @QuasLacrimas
IMO you’re wrong about this, and maybe even in the completely opposite valence. International students are fleeced by top colleges at enormous rates and their “subsidy” lets them charge <25% the international rate to home state students. I have seen foreigners pay enormous sums to go to middling universities
21 ♥ · long-form · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
(the gentle interpretation is not a dereliction of duty but a flow state detachment from outcomes)
287 ♥ · 5 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @yacineMTB
@yacineMTB Hanuman inspired the legend of Sun Wukong who inspired the legend of Goku so that’s as close as it gets to an anime deity
1,238 ♥ · 31 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @esrtweet
ive changed my mind on the Terence Tao thing. I think it’s a reasonably valid political weapon to take federal funds from a whole university, and the system will probably survive some creative destruction like that. it doesn’t make me happy but someone of Tao’s talents won’t be without funding for long
41 ♥ · long-form · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @alyssakrejmas
@alyssakrejmas possibly a unique event in the history of rebrands in that it completely failed and the entire customer base calls it something else
3 ♥ · x.com →