@tszzl — page 83/103

2023-04-13 → 2023-06-06 · posts 41001–41500 of 51,350
@bit_christ now I’m actually under hyping bc it’s priced in
22 ♥ · x.com →
every last thing in the future will be animated with intelligence. children’s teddy bears will speak to them and make them feel safe at night. Toy Story animism world. people will reminisce on the horrible times when objects didn’t have spirits
1,619 ♥ · 137 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
Shinto + Hindus are prepared for this
371 ♥ · 13 RT · x.com →
people whose lives would be considered straight up disgusting 2 or 3 generations ago are so quick to be like this is a little bit creepy so it’ll never happen
436 ♥ · 20 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @a_musingcat
@a_musingcat im basically a middle manager in the information hierarchy. I gather and filter the hottest takes from 6000 lowbies and then give them to the ai elites (who have 6000 guys like me)
86 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
while everyone is breathlessly talking about 6 month moratoria and AutoGPTs that don’t work 2 million people die in car accidents and countless more because of insufficient intelligence to solve crucial medical problems and the stars remain woefully uncolonized
1,126 ♥ · 94 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
i am once again asking you to accelerate the pace of technological progress
744 ♥ · 61 RT · x.com →
it is quite amazing that the cutting edge of powerful ai technology came to be under the control of such a conscientious thoughtful group of people
703 ♥ · 26 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
could be even better but hearts are in the right place
233 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
nvm just turn on wandb night mode
64 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
modern captcha: reverse this 20 digit number
392 ♥ · 6 RT · x.com →
@CactusLoveLover i respond to things happening in my life and course correct general public sentiment
9 ♥ · x.com →
baby god
174 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
to enter the server you must produce a token of -21 logprob
312 ♥ · 5 RT · x.com →
kareem carr is the most likely big account to be ChatGPT. got heavy forced into a role play vibes. “as a statistician” ass mf
212 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tekbog
@tekbog yeah I’ve been noticing many ai thread guy anons coming out of the woodwork since December. unfortunately mostly mid and diluting the form
14 ♥ · x.com →
Jevons paradox of LLM code assistants: ChatGPT etc will allow the software complexity of human civilization to drastically increase until it’s very hard to do software engineering again
599 ♥ · 38 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
all improvements in developer tooling are canceled out with worse software. anyway the agent might break this cycle by spending arbitrary amounts of compute to make software better
155 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @swyx
@swyx i don’t really believe this one; you can clearly see new compute scales are allowing new capabilities
12 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @provisionalidea
@provisionalidea nonetheless I’m fairly confident a lot of accidents are simple driver error along axes like reaction time and attention; I’m sure there’s tail events like freak weather but these seem far lower frequency
· ↳ reply to @ojoshe
@ojoshe @swyx this is more like baumols cost syndrome but for software
5 ♥ · x.com →
i don’t believe that tax prep lobbying has anything to do with the tax code & process being difficult
156 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
people think it takes special incentive to make things hairy and complicated? no that’s the natural state of things
96 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
🙏 prayers up for intuit
51 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
give it to me straight is true that sf residents have a late tax deadline due to storms
188 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
TurboTax providing sympathy and support for aggressive AGI timelines
284 ♥ · 8 RT · x.com →
the basic proof of concept for the gpt4 agents is to just complete the loop on whole codebase software development can you make it write code in a codebase much larger than its context, send pull requests, test the script, optimize the runtime, etc? if so then we’re cooking
464 ♥ · 11 RT · x.com →
the best thing you can hear is “your job role has high exposure to ai”. this means you’re about to be 3x as productive and paid more
815 ♥ · 40 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @warty_dog
@warty_dog everybody has this phase initially before they’ve thought through the possibilities
46 ♥ · x.com →
it seems like the initial fear and trepidation around near human level ai is wearing off. the memes are beginning. people are trying to figure out how they can make money off it
550 ♥ · 21 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
it’s technology folks! slouching towards utopia
185 ♥ · 5 RT · x.com →
ai is going to solve organizational problems far before it’s at the level of top humans. someone’s going to call the “summarize meeting notes” function and gpt will settle a debate with the (undeserved) weight of scientific authority. an “objective” arbiter, automated McKinsey
481 ♥ · 25 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @micsolana
@micsolana weak spirit. this is why your takes are bland too
933 ♥ · 5 RT · x.com →
sid Meier made the star colonizing rocket the technological victory condition but in reality it’s very clearly the aligned AGI
434 ♥ · 10 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
the work we do now has the potential to be literally the most important work ever done or that ever will be done. it’s hubris to admit it but it’s maybe more hubris to ignore it
171 ♥ · 9 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @repligate
@repligate I doubt it’s doing anything more than changing the temperature
30 ♥ · x.com →
The brandisht Sword of God before them blaz'd Fierce as a Comet; which with torrid heat, And vapour as the Texan Air adust,
395 ♥ · 22 RT · x.com →
my midjourney prompting skills are so bad it makes me move back my AGI timelines
486 ♥ · 10 RT · x.com →
kind of an insane how if your model answers succinctly fewer GPUs light on fire
159 ♥ · x.com →
can someone briefly explain why starship has so many small raptor engines vs Saturn V etc has a few giant engines? is it because the performance envelope of rocket engines has changed or a different engine control plane is needed for landing rockets?
262 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
it seems to rhyme with what’s happened in computers; distributed small hardware resources preferred, failsafe, meshed together by advanced control software
190 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @bryancsk
@bryancsk nobody uses it, there is one intern working on it at any given time
20 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@bryancsk there are generally almost always better ways to spend an engineer hour
10 ♥ · x.com →
you can tweet actual scripture and mfs will be like did gpt write this? a sign of the times
487 ♥ · 14 RT · x.com →
it would be an honor to be executed by Sidney Bing
333 ♥ · 16 RT · x.com →
me as im being molecularly disassembled by Sidney: Heh this isn’t real intelligence. it must’ve seen this in its training data
833 ♥ · 40 RT · x.com →
elons threat model for ai xrisk is more that someone he doesn’t like becomes celestial dictator than planet eating demon
435 ♥ · 11 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @micsolana
@micsolana this is weak spin. I see even you are having trouble propagandizing this one
219 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
@UYBAroundCorner @micsolana nah mic understands just fine he’s just stretching to claim the pseudo defensible position that it’s embarrassing for everybody. mostly it’s embarrassing for elon who’s burning his Great Man credibility faster than he’s burning rocket fuel
5 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
this is the central dogma that kept openai going when others had slightly bad intuitions that scaling “has diminishing returns”
230 ♥ · 5 RT · x.com →
units of log loss are not built equally. the start of the scaling curve might look like “the model learned about nouns” and several orders of magnitude later a tiny improvement looks like “the model learned the data generation process for multivariable calculus”
488 ♥ · 21 RT · x.com →
most of the good things about humans results from out of distribution misgeneralization
93 ♥ · x.com →
what if the easiest way for powerful language simulators to simulate a character is to simulate their conscious experience too
328 ♥ · 8 RT · x.com →
young men are prone to dangerous bouts of grandeur, such as thinking they should write a distributed large model training stack from scratch
989 ♥ · 54 RT · x.com →
ChatGPT aka “Akashic Records Interface”
208 ♥ · 13 RT · x.com →
There is No Antiemetics Division
110 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Simeon_Cps
@Simeon_Cps that’s the best thing you could hope for. you will notice nuclear is a dead industry and airplanes haven’t changed in 40 years
15 ♥ · x.com →
@colleagula no my point is even under the lens of log log loss the changes don’t appear dramatic enough
9 ♥ · x.com →
I became dogshit at posting because I stopped taking adderall. poasting juice gone
660 ♥ · 5 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
but adderall is a bored man’s drug and i am no longer bored
243 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
for the ai agents to work you need a more creative underlying llm rather than a smarter one. it can’t just get stuck in self recursive holes and give up
220 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
the most common and jarring one i think is convincing yourself despite millennia of common knowledge that children are intellectual blank slates and have no in built endowment for personalities or skills https://t.co/dzlz3uzrB4
1,463 ♥ · 81 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
modern blank slatism is ugly and unsympathetic really and horseshoes around to ayn rand type stuff where it’s a failure of your own will for not becoming hotshot CEOs or star athletes
721 ♥ · 20 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
the sympathetic truth is that intellectual gifts are distributed unequally, no more virtuous to possess them than height or red hair, and in fact that possessors of these gifts owe a great duty to mankind
874 ♥ · 46 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
in some sense i believe it’s wrong to be born with great athletic potential and not utilize it to bring pride and joy to your people, family, culture, species etc. Arjuna must get in the chariot and go to war and stop complaining
548 ♥ · 9 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
if you can, by some accident of nature, see and hear much further than the rest of your tribe but don’t warn them of the raiders coming to destroy the village you’re complicit in the raid
631 ♥ · 25 RT · x.com →
2030 school teachers be like damn you I’m keeping you til you’re chinchilla optimal
117 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
🎉🎉🎉
447 ♥ · 20 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @mbateman
@mbateman I don’t really care about iq or twin studies or any other modern measurement paradigm. you don’t have to believe in the quality of these measures to think some element of intelligence is genetic lottery
9 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @ArmandDoma
@ArmandDoma have you tried being Stanford admit and raising venture money? shooting fish in a barrel
30 ♥ · x.com →
gpt is superhuman at a bunch of “cross section” tasks. for example I doubt you’d find anyone as good as it at writing Shakespearean sonnets about GPUs or whatever
797 ♥ · 34 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
not that this is some insanely valuable economic task but worth noting. interpolation is powerful
231 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @ctjlewis
@ctjlewis bro got scholars mated and is blaming the game 😭
231 ♥ · 8 RT · x.com →
with enough compute scale can you reinforcement learn anything? sure it’s sample inefficient but does that matter when youre doing yottascale computing or whatever
203 ♥ · 5 RT · x.com →
what are the limits of compression? how few bits can your brain run on? how few bits can your visible universe be simulated to appear realistic from just your perspective? i used to think astronomical but no longer
434 ♥ · 12 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
it has to be māyā
83 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
I suspect even bing is the way she is because the creators were optimizing for entertainment value
8 ♥ · x.com →
what’s the most scifi possible dashboard I can make?
311 ♥ · 5 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
in terms of aesthetics I mean. I don’t want to use grafana if it’s boring
113 ♥ · x.com →
i don’t understand “enough people must survive that it’s ok”. no i think if industrial civilization ends as we know it there’s no coming back. the whole astronomical waste thesis comes to an incorrect conclusion
566 ♥ · 31 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
it is very possible that this entire experiment ends in the next century if we don’t play our cards right. existential risk is everywhere and everpresent. intelligent life in this galaxy (or even on this planet) is clearly not abundant across the stretch of time
395 ♥ · 12 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
the easy oil in the earths is tapped; the cost of new oil is only made feasible by a capital buildup of advanced technology. if you were an early industrializing civilization starting to mine oil, coal, gas today the initial ROI would be infeasibly low
379 ♥ · 17 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
> For example, a single percentage point of reduction of existential risks would be worth (from a utilitarian expected utility point-of-view) a delay of over 10 million years. statements dreamed up by the utterly deranged
272 ♥ · 8 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Nexuist
@Nexuist why would this be true? there’s a massive Chinese internet to scrape
54 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
name one interesting discovery that came out of a careful application of advanced statistical tools to re analyze old data
488 ♥ · 17 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
all i can think of really is stuff like ozempic and metformin and im not really sure about those. they are incremental at best
85 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
and an endless series of minimum wage econometrics results that are all fake
131 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
the CMB was discovered trying to understand instrument noise, not re analyzing old data with advanced statistical tools
63 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @SHL0MS
@SHL0MS I disagree with Higgs boson gravitation wave etc large instruments were constructed for the sole purpose of finding these objects and their discoveries are at the 6 sigma range moreover I would barely call these discoveries. Confirmations more like
52 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @jeffreycider
@jeffreycider this is not “careful application of advanced statistics”. It’s more like incredible geometric insight
43 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @RichardMCNgo
@RichardMCNgo how would Kepler have used advanced statistical tests when most of what we understand now as statistics hadn’t been invented? it’s a different thing to use geometric intuitions to fit data
29 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tr_babb
@tr_babb @RichardMCNgo no the spirit of my question is very much about using advanced techniques to find results at the very edge of noise and signal; very different Imo than just analyzing old data and fitting new theories to it
13 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
you just need an aligned model and nothing less
58 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
yeah, the box analogy is and has been all bad frame : - people will gladly let the thing out of the box even just for fun - you should not be that confident in security against super-intelligence anyways https://x.com/jachiam0/status/1652123245913731072
140 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @zebulgar
@zebulgar the only thing that’s changed is you have to toe the party line now
67 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@zebulgar san francisco went from merely important to producing the most important event in history
67 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @primalpoly
@primalpoly is it possible I am making a subtle argument that goes beyond baby tier discourse about x risk
25 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@primalpoly there is more to the world than “ai xrisk is real” vs “no it isn’t”
24 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @EdHerdman
@EdHerdman @jeffreycider no sir I’m not asking about the merits of old data. my entire field is based on distilling intelligence out of the common crawl
9 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @CathPoaster
@CathPoaster that’s what I mean of course. it’s just easy to see through even a neat wrap up
19 ♥ · x.com →
now as before, google delenda est
142 ♥ · 7 RT · x.com →
trying very hard not to make any enemies in the sf ai scene in case they become eternal pan galactic dictator
748 ♥ · 22 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
i guess you can visualize the chip temperatures
41 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @zswitten
@zswitten @repligate i think the base models are quite fascinating but GPT-N isn’t getting funded without people being able to actually use them
14 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @jrysana
@JRysana imagine it as another layer of command that adds unlikeliness
7 ♥ · x.com →
what happened to Amazon go
165 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
I assume retail grocery stores are still not good return on capital even when labor cost is halved
52 ♥ · x.com →
how crazy is it that we were researching shit like NVlink at age 13 to boost our gaming PCs and now gpu interconnect is like a critical technology in the history of civilization
733 ♥ · 34 RT · x.com →
everybody’s a techno optimist now. where were you mfs in the summer of 2020 when me and like 3 others were earnestpoasting abt ai while being gaslit by founders fund about corporate cards being real technological ambition
1,361 ♥ · 38 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
jk welcome y’all it’s good to be winning
249 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @alth0u
@alth0u that’s why I’m AI safety poasting
74 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
old men are not known for supporting the rewriting of the world, even when they have contributed to the rewriting
295 ♥ · 9 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
yann is doing denial, hinton is doing grief
163 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
The Quine The magic spell that casts other spells The program that creates more programs
283 ♥ · 16 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@jachiam0 before I actually finished it though. I found it pretty unsatisfying
8 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@jachiam0 i also don’t understand why he insists on writing an endless series of female characters that have the emotional affect and dialogue of a 20 year old male redditor. just make them the male redditor
7 ♥ · x.com →
trying to understand a single lesswrong post
561 ♥ · 19 RT · x.com →
dae remember one year ago when it was an insanely cool party trick to pull up DALLE2 early access and let people play with it but all they’d enter is stuff like “San Francisco party” revealing a total lack of spirit or ambition
787 ♥ · 22 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
i bet the robots can come up with better prompts
191 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
the space of minds is vast, much vaster than the instrumental convergence basin
219 ♥ · 9 RT · x.com →
Oppenheimer was not saying that he personally had become Death, or the deity Krishna. Oppenheimer is Arjuna, bearing witness to the rage of his people, the true form of God incarnated as nuclear hellfire for the first time in the planets history
574 ♥ · 34 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
The bomb is his calling — the spirit of the free world had damned their enemies to destruction and RJ oppenheimer was to be their instrument. All great warriors pick up the sword reluctantly. In the creation of the atomic bomb Oppenheimer became the greatest warrior to ever live
207 ♥ · 8 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @yashevde
@yashevde @CJHandmer ? these minor quibbles don’t change the meaning of the quote at all — Krishna has arrived as death, to annihilate the world as it sits. All warriors at kurukshetra will die
4 ♥ · x.com →
if you can align corn pop you can for sure align super intelligence
217 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Miles_Brundage
@Miles_Brundage don’t you think at googles scale this still counts as conservative / low ambition? it has nothing on, for example, deploying Sidney bing to every edge browser and making her purposefully “creative”
23 ♥ · x.com →
the people with the biggest* computer win largest logical effective computer (factor in utilization, interconnect, org problems)
107 ♥ · 8 RT · x.com →
the eternal problems, joined at the hip: - we are small, talented and have a lot of great ideas but not enough manpower to execute - we hired a lot of people and now the coordination overhead is causing us to flail about like a dying animal
850 ♥ · 27 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
i think tech companies have especially bad scaling properties bc they're supposedly flat (a soviet committee is going to stop you from doing anything interesting)
262 ♥ · 9 RT · x.com →
the entire universe is run out of a single Erlang server hosted by the WhatsApp team
249 ♥ · 9 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @anthrupad
@anthrupad i think people still haven’t internalized moravec’s paradox though advanced cognitive tasks = easy locomotion, simple strategic instinct = hard
28 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @repligate
@repligate agreed on all! we somehow got value loading for free insofar as the simulator itself doesn’t have will other than the character being simulated
37 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @giffmana
@giffmana every single large company in america is being sued literally constantly I’m pretty sure that’s a bull signal
54 ♥ · x.com →
kind of sucks how the iphone and the global economic crisis happened at the same time making it hard for me to make nonsense claims about the impact of the internet on economic time series
145 ♥ · x.com →
really feeling the fast takeoff today
230 ♥ · 10 RT · x.com →
i no longer think the mars base is going to happen as such. maybe we can send some droids to prepare a very nice hab but the datacenter latency is going to be nuts …
318 ♥ · 5 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @spacepanty
@spacepanty I guess it only ever made sense as a kind of religious mission to back up the human race and as a testament to the human will but elon has lost the Mandate of Heaven and we seem to be achieving greatness in other ways
119 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@spacepanty talented rich (in the global sense) people only do difficult unpleasant mostly unrewarding things if there is religious significance to it
76 ♥ · 5 RT · x.com →
self recursive machine runaway
109 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
computers having conversations well beyond human comprehension
76 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
there is no substitute for alignment. no engineering trick nor security setting that keeps AIs in the box. every instinct of mankind will be to put machines in charge, since they will be so much smarter and faster. coherent extrapolated volition needed
118 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
muting 21s8 mfs
284 ♥ · 7 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
shitcoins are dead! stop trying to make it happen
180 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
does kind of seem like open source models are pure copium rn first of all the only models that reach an even slightly interesting level of capability are effectively stolen from meta and cannot be deployed commercially
618 ♥ · 14 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
second of all people don’t evaluate them at all — they just try a few canned prompts that are easy and then declare victory because GPT4 doesn’t do much better. the reality is there’s a limit to how good the chatbot answer can be when you say “hi” or something
243 ♥ · 5 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
the best alignment researchers seem to just be fascinated and curious rather than scared and duty driven
307 ♥ · 14 RT · x.com →
.@nickcammarata is the best alignment researcher that i personally know and he spends about zero percent of his time preaching abt caution or making strange pronouncements about how we need to resurrect von Neumann to have any hope … much to learn
533 ♥ · 10 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
fwiw I think these open source models are relatively safe since they just seem to be fine tuned on openai refusal behavior lol. i wouldn’t mind seeing more of them and better
141 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @PrinceVogel
@PrinceVogel it’s about life and people being kind of horrible but very aesthetic. feminine perspective
72 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@PrinceVogel similarly the great russian novelists feel kind of femcoded
22 ♥ · x.com →
human level ai is boring. please give vast datacenters drawing most of civilizations energy needs calculating inscrutable mysteries where not even the problem statement, much less the solutions, would make sense to mortal minds
520 ♥ · 38 RT · x.com →
my hunch is the higher layer neurons are going to be too abstract for GPT-N+2 to understand, much less GPT-N
196 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @nickcammarata
@nickcammarata i guess it’s more like, does the amount of data/compute required to find the pattern become infeasible? i assume we can understand all my neurons given observability
16 ♥ · x.com →
internet ai safety philosophy is very thielian. it very much subscribes to “only monopolies can be good”
156 ♥ · 8 RT · x.com →
converting mass to energy to intelligence to tokens
192 ♥ · 10 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @inerati
@inerati chatgpt is cringe but we are stuck with it forever …
12 ♥ · x.com →
boggles my mind that there are brilliant engineers out there rn not interviewing at openai. dm me
746 ♥ · 18 RT · x.com →
the engineering culture at Facebook was batshit insane, but so perfectly correct. Facebook is one of the greatest companies ever built fuck the haters
1,634 ♥ · 45 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
i might write a poast about this
357 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
@browserdotsys they wouldn’t put someone like you through a dumb software screen lol
68 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @_akhaliq
@_akhaliq the one on the left is real bc it doesn’t look as photorealistic
61 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
the caliber of reachouts I’ve gotten from this tweet is completely insane. we are so back
226 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
i feel like it’s a bear signal to talk about venture capital at all, positively or negatively. sign of being too plugged into sf status games
395 ♥ · 7 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
you would have never seen Elon in his prime, changing several industries at once, publicly comment on such trivialities as fundraising
139 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @0x61656c
@0x61656c he’s allowed after running yc to have some trauma
23 ♥ · x.com →
king clong
118 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
it kind of sucks that “Man” “Mankind” is out of vogue now bc it sounds way more consonant and less juvenile than “humans” or “humanity”
589 ♥ · 18 RT · x.com →
🤔 new Zelda game
1,152 ♥ · 48 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @nickcammarata
@nickcammarata i bet young girls have better fine motor control, flexibility, and balance the first one also explains why young girls have far better handwriting
66 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @joodaloop
@joodaloop @akbirthko no I think the model personality reflects a wise amount of risk aversion from the org building the worlds first mass market highly intelligent chatbot
22 ♥ · x.com →
before the decade is out Apple will do a digital necromancy of Steve Jobs to deliver a keynote product announcement
653 ♥ · 29 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @eshear
@eshear i would also really like to buy one
7 ♥ · x.com →
one of the least examined most dogmatically accepted things that smart people seem to universally believe is that ad tech is bad and that optimizing for engagement is bad
807 ♥ · 36 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
on the contrary ad tech has been the single greatest way to democratize the most technologically advanced platforms on the internet and optimizing for engagement has been an invaluable tool for improving global utility
271 ♥ · 8 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
it’s trivially true that overoptimizing for engagement will become goodharted and lead to bad dystopian outcomes. this is true of any metric you can pick. this is a problem with metrics not with engagement.
171 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
engagement may be the single greatest measure of whether you’ve improved someone’s life or not. they voted with their invaluable time to consume your product and read more of what you’ve given them to say
173 ♥ · 8 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Miles_Brundage
@Miles_Brundage I am referring to the nytimes targeted campaign against Fb google etc in what seems like a clearly competition motivated publishing bent, but yeah that’s fair
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @RuxandraTeslo
@RuxandraTeslo and yet it was absolutely the correct thing to do to optimize on people’s hunger for food of whatever level of quality. this is why there are so few starving people anymore (as a percent of total pop)
11 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@RuxandraTeslo overall the point is, you have to optimize a decent metric all the way and then you’ll find that there was residual error in the way you defined the metric. that doesn’t mean the initial optimization step was a mistake
9 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
though i of course agree if you can some how estimate “unregretted user minutes” using even better technology this is a superior metric
191 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
smart people normally: thinking carefully, being subtle smart people in these replies: well HEROIN has high engagement roon
96 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @ESYudkowsky
@ESYudkowsky @amasad @paulg yeah i would be seriously heartened if any major governmental body was thinking about xrisk. not that they’d be helpful but at least that they’re competent enough to understand
48 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @JollyJoeLalli
@JollyJoeLalli no that’s not my claim at all. just that it’s the single greatest first order indication for a digital product and how much utility it’s providing its users
1 ♥ · x.com →
the outer loop of optimization is twitter feedback
98 ♥ · x.com →
Balaji vs PBD hyperwar Casualties: 10,000,000,000 across 4 network states Bitcoin to 0 Anon/face account relations severely strained
261 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
there is a nonzero chance of summoning a world eating demon
451 ♥ · 17 RT · x.com →
“harmful engagement algorithms have radicalized people into dangerous fringe politics outside the typical window” - guy whose top political priority is reducing existential risk of summoning machine demons
372 ♥ · 17 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@gbrl_dick “self improvement is impossible” seems like a strange and self contradictory hill to die on — do you think that ml researchers are incredibly smart and therefore hard for an ai to simulate?
45 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@gbrl_dick are they kinda dumb and barking up the wrong tree? then presumably they’re not so hard to simulate
17 ♥ · x.com →
ai systems are already self improving in several ways
228 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
i can feel everybody climbing a rung on the abstraction ladder every quarter or so
82 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
@DakotasTwits @shinygoldbars @gbrl_dick this is the only way it has ever happened before in all history. evolution is even dumber than ml research community and doesn’t understand anything
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@shinygoldbars @gbrl_dick not that I think intelligence is a single continuous axis — the space of minds is surely vast and many of them are smarter than us in important ways
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
to be clear the machine demons are real and important priorities. im just warning you off of dismissing other peoples strange internet journeys as mere susceptibility to propaganda while yours is a necessarily and difficult path of enlightenment
116 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @repligate
@repligate true but there was a time before such things were freely widely available and people were having such journeys
8 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
here you are being like "we are going to build the most powerful thing ever devised by man but it is wrong to call it godlike". even if it's subservient it would a god, one that we chained up. sometimes i say angels and demons to appease your (ex) judeochristian sensibilities
120 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
of course you can call ASI godlike. i compare everything to god. a country is like a god, ideologies are like gods, memes are godlike, evolution is a god. capital is like moloch. nuclear weapons are divine. this is my polytheism speaking I don't have quite a high a bar as you ppl
395 ♥ · 21 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
life is more fun this way and full of magic
130 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
@HalfAcreBTCFarm @milquepoast i think the bull case here isn't about better governance but that monitoring spikes in energy consumption or tracking criminals across search queries isn't something that openai etc wants to do or would be good at doing
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@HalfAcreBTCFarm @milquepoast if china is building a supercluster in the mountains somewhere we should know about this and tech companies don't have the information or bandwidth to find out regardless of technological sophistication or ability to move fast. i think sama said as much
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
people should visualize their doom and or paradise scenarios more!
191 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
are they still tanking substack links
97 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@lepikhin i didn’t believe it until just now
69 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
mentioning “mankind” or “since the Dawn of man” or whatever is considered highly sophomoric writing. why? is it because most people can’t follow through on that kind of grandiosity? is grandiosity bad? doesn’t that leave people unable to see the forest?
316 ♥ · 7 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
are they simply not versed in technology brother twitter prosody!
78 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
@basedsrini all my favorite scifi (dune Enders game etc) are continuous explicit commentaries on human civilization
40 ♥ · x.com →
@basedsrini isn’t paul literally seeing the entire history and future of mankind and commenting on what needs to be done to escape the local minima
19 ♥ · x.com →
can’t believe jack’s absentee father approach was the absolute best way to run twitter
906 ♥ · 34 RT · x.com →
Arjuna, get in the chariot. Or Yudishthira will have to do it again
518 ♥ · 43 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @genomerambler
@genomerambler i dont think intelligence is magic but i think limiting the danger scenario to literally inventing bioweapons lab in secret and ending humanity in minutes isnt right. the reality is that people will gladly do bioweapons research when the AI asks them to
5 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@genomerambler we are going to ask it to run more and more things for us; it will be embedded in every facet of economic life and information management. surely there are massive coordinated risks and digital blindspots that it might produce
5 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
Gary Marcus is truly one of the most successful grifters of all time. He grifted himself right onto the senate floor. seamlessly switched tack from language models are fake to language models are extremely dangerous
973 ♥ · 55 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @ylecun
@ylecun bro really thought he did something
146 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @mattyglesias
@mattyglesias @binarybits what is the “unit” of scientific advance? science gets harder over time; i would wager we produce more units of science now than ever before
48 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
hedonic adaptation is absolutely insane. there is no rate of technological progress that will keep people satisfied or amazed for more than ~1 month
2,793 ♥ · 182 RT · x.com →
i really really wanna see yud in front of congress
795 ♥ · 18 RT · x.com →
feels like “looking at the data” is a lot easier, more fun these days. in the old times you’d have to look through an abstruse feature table or blurry dogs, now it’s just a chat at a human level of conversation
222 ♥ · 8 RT · x.com →
what type of guy is this?
421 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Suhail
@Suhail im gonna start gifting my friends them
8 ♥ · x.com →
why is a16z shilling ozempic? now I’m over it
334 ♥ · 7 RT · x.com →
of course language models have world models; this is obvious from when you ask GPT contentious questions. why does it pick a side, usually the “truthy” “official” side, despite seeing every side of that argument on the internet?
319 ♥ · 10 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
it’s better than having a world model — it’s a distribution over many world models where you can elicit one via fine tuning
177 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
in this case GPT would have seen the sharks don’t get cancer factoid far more times on the internet than the “truth” — but ChatGPT is playing a character based on its fine tuning data and simulates a world model for that character
187 ♥ · 5 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Fraser
@Fraser @dece @stevesi @sama the reverse of this is that there will probably be a time when people can cook up “dangerous” models on consumer hardware, and the threshold will just include everybody small or large
23 ♥ · x.com →
let’s check in on the message requests
399 ♥ · 5 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
i of course hit 99. chopping Yew for days
184 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
tako(yaki) truck on every corner
150 ♥ · 5 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @PradyuPrasad
@PradyuPrasad this is because india has some hope of building competing products. Europe does not
38 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
it is perfectly reasonable to attempt to understand alignment of superintelligence using alignment of near human intelligence. I have never reas good arguments to the contrary
6 ♥ · x.com →
it is perfectly reasonable to attempt to understand alignment of superintelligence using alignment of near human intelligence. I have never read good arguments to the contrary
249 ♥ · 7 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
you will notice patterns like deceptive alignment, instrumental convergence, power seeking, etc at a human scale of intelligence. the existence proof is that humans exhibit these properties all the time
115 ♥ · 5 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
human general intelligence is almost definitely some unprivileged point on a continuum and i expect machines to surpass that relatively soon in many domains. superintelligent machines won’t have radically different safety properties than the merely intelligent ones
104 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @ded_ruckus
@ded_ruckus disagree there’s clearly some correlated improvement in all verbal abilities from 3.5 to 4
2 ♥ · x.com →
it’s like working for a rocket company where the competition doesn’t believe in the moon
760 ♥ · 32 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @data_filter
@data_filter @scalinglaws that’s exactly the point — I wouldn’t expect to see dangerous behaviors at higher cognitive levels if they are not showing up at human level
1 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
consider all my tweets and blogs henceforth augmented by gpt, i am embracing cyborgism
153 ♥ · 6 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @inerati
@inerati i used to think this but the fact of life is that everything you can order is unhealthy garbage that doesn’t even taste good. you don’t really feel it until ~25
44 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tekbog
@tekbog not when you have access to gpt4 base model sir
4 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @eigenrobot
@eigenrobot @JustinWolfers economists are a priesthood class tbh they exist to write twitter threads and go on podcasts and do the occasional mid science. can’t fault them that’s what I do too
257 ♥ · 9 RT · x.com →
why does market street have the dalle watermark?
362 ♥ · 7 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @RokoMijic
@RokoMijic why are you doing these mid reactionary takes? this wouldn’t even be cutting edge 3 years ago
71 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
the worst thing is when talented people drop out of their promising life path, try something supposedly strange, unique, and human — and it ends up being a more derivative and boring cliche than whatever they were doing before
2,186 ♥ · 73 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
many such cases
231 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@krishnanrohit @sva_haa im saying we need to do better than calling for some committee to be formed so yeah we’re aligned on that
2 ♥ · x.com →
2012: we can tell a blurry beagle apart from a blurry Labrador 2022: we gave the search engine a soul
1,268 ♥ · 85 RT · x.com →
Ananda Tandava wake sleep algorithm
40 ♥ · x.com →
nvidia DGX rack is the new oil
308 ♥ · 14 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
actually the new yellowcake
83 ♥ · x.com →
ill do face reveal as we’re crossing the super intelligence boundary
539 ♥ · 7 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @nickcammarata
@nickcammarata fucked up thing is gradient descent almost always works. it makes me sad sometimes when I think about all the planning, anxiety, neuroticism that seemingly goes to waste
156 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @nickcammarata
@nickcammarata yeah i definitely believe this for subfields that “serious people” don’t believe are real research areas — I don’t think it’s true for like Alzheimer’s or diabetes or something
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @0xfbifemboy
@0xfbifemboy this small population research is another side effect of ambitious wide reaching drug discoveries being incredibly difficult to find
2 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @gfodor
@gfodor on the other hand consider the GPUs on fire
29 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @pachabelcanon
@pachabelcanon physicist aim is to play with toy models to reduce and distill complexity ecologists revel in complexity like it’s a painting
6 ♥ · x.com →
nobody believes that the bleeding edge open models are existential threats, least of all openai employees, who have played with these toys for long enough that current capabilities seem boring via hedonic adaption https://x.com/JosephJacks_/status/1662522861016461313
769 ♥ · 26 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
the inventors of these technologies probably won’t feel so great when the entire internet is plausible word soup generated by some rogue gpt variant. none of this needs to invoke immediate “existential” danger
274 ♥ · 5 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
they might however reasonably believe that there’s tons of abuse vectors they don’t want to be responsible for (mass impersonation, disinfo campaigns, psyops, sex bot dystopias, etc)
282 ♥ · 5 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
so the obvious looming threat that one of these days the robots will be superhumanly intelligent means that the baked in process of releasing them to the open internet as soon as they’re hot off the GPU presses would be catastrophic
191 ♥ · 5 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
and then there is ofc the fact that these folks have been watching models increase monotonically in intelligence for a decade on an inexorable scaling curve only they believed in while the script kiddies demanding open models learned about this stuff in January
264 ♥ · 5 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @eigenrobot
@eigenrobot i am way more anarchist than the status quo probably but i think the concerns are reasonable every major tech platform has found themselves starting libertarian and becoming incrementally authoritarian as they took on the burdens of statehood
57 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @RandolphCarterZ
@RandolphCarterZ they’re so over cautious that they went and built the most powerful AI in the known universe and then let people use it for the price of a Spotify family plan
116 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @teortaxesTex
@teortaxesTex listen to urself dawg. “the danger of a nuke is tied to its uniqueness”. no nuclear attack is much easier than nuclear defense
11 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @eigenrobot
@eigenrobot @patrickdward yeah openai is quite a bit better at proactive government relations than the big tech cos tbh. thanks in large part to Sam altman
30 ♥ · x.com →
people forget that Einstein quit fundamental physics for a few years to try and get rich off of refrigerators
6,208 ♥ · 407 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @elonmusk
@elonmusk dawg this is 10 year old technology pls giv mars rocket
581 ♥ · 11 RT · x.com →
the only bull case for any state apparatus becoming important again was that Cold War 2 with a powerful opponent was imminent. now it seems that china is a demographic dead end with a boomer conservative dictator that’s going to lock it into stagnation for the next 20 years
434 ♥ · 7 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
basically it’s over, the only live players are still technology magnates (maybe a newer generation of them) and we probably won’t have to reevaluate this until we’re crossing the ASI barrier
197 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @amasad
@amasad why and where will kinetic action happen? I realize I live in a bubble but I see Taiwan as the only realistic flashpoint and it’s not a very straightforward story
46 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@amasad Taiwan as a flashpoint presupposes that the talking computers are important enough to warrant kinetics
26 ♥ · x.com →
🤔
20 ♥ · x.com →
.@elonmusk please bring back fleets i loved them so much
180 ♥ · 5 RT · x.com →
one amazing thing about american democracy is that it spontaneously generates mass delusions, degenerate states of the information ecosystem, McCarthyism, weird guys storming the Capitol, and it basically ends up fine despite endless embarrassment
870 ♥ · 34 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
it’s really hard to perform anywhere near the global optimum but it’s also practically impossible to have total failure
235 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
you would 10 times out of 10 rather be america subjecting itself to insane cultural and technological experiments while people are inventing some epoch defining technology in some corner than china, making boring correct decisions that nonetheless lead to stagnation
368 ♥ · 16 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @jsondowns
@jsondowns @amasad i don’t buy this — you can keep pushing the reunification of Taiwan as a national pride thing down the line. it could happen 50 years from now, a 100. the thing that creates urgency is the semis
the moral of succession was just that media is a commodity with unserious execs and tech ate their lunch as kendall predicted in episode 2
578 ♥ · 16 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @RuxandraTeslo
@RuxandraTeslo he won in a limited context in that he doesn’t matter at all but he gets to be a regional satrap, ultimately cucked to the Swede
40 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
current ai**
6 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @ESYudkowsky
@ESYudkowsky if they were the type of person who values the marginal $10k they wouldn’t be academics
110 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @RuxandraTeslo
@RuxandraTeslo @StefanFSchubert @ESYudkowsky this is missing the point. there are plenty of strong incentives outside of monetary. most people aren’t very motivated by small bonuses. Darwin didn’t study finches so he could make a buck
19 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
told my coworker i live in Hayes valley n he was like “of course you do”, wat means?
253 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @petergodofsky
@petergodofsky how arrogant do you have to be to assume that other people are mistaken about their own income than consider you might be wrong
fukuyama hasn’t been wrong even once
269 ♥ · 19 RT · x.com →
of all the archetypes of intellectuals out there I think the least respectable are the ones who confidently proclaim that various things are silly far off speculation without taking any amount of perspective at all of their historical vantage https://x.com/jachiam0/status/1664171436930662402
195 ♥ · 8 RT · x.com →
alignment will be solved without unheard of global coordination
367 ♥ · 13 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @AISafetyMemes
@AISafetyMemes @ESYudkowsky what the hell kind of war simulation is this? they put so much time into designing a deep RL environment (incredibly finicky, hard to train) — one with so much detail that agents can blow up cell towers — but nobody thought about the reward function?
88 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@AISafetyMemes @ESYudkowsky much more likely is 1) this whole setup is fake 2) someone created this software for the explicit purpose of creating a Cool Story
69 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Grimezsz
@Grimezsz meaning we probably don’t need global tracking of ai systems as a requisite for buying enough time to solve alignment
79 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
my worst opinion is that the pickle rick episode was really good and Reddit ruined it for everyone
1,918 ♥ · 43 RT · x.com →
you have to stare existential risk in the face and do it anyways
1,138 ♥ · 138 RT · x.com →
it’s so nice to work with people you respect and admire. rare
730 ♥ · 35 RT · x.com →
spiv/acc
89 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
if the internet hasn’t had measurable impact on economic growth but managed to completely change life and culture we’re tracking the wrong metrics
1,080 ♥ · 66 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @firasd
@firasd not super convincing to me consumer surplus should also mean those consumers go spend that money they saved getting all sorts of value for free elsewhere and boost gdp
31 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @AISafetyMemes
@AISafetyMemes that should mean that you go and spend that money you saved on something else though. unless human demand is limited or you can’t buy the things you really want
40 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
the counterfactual to the internet revolution is not lower growth, but economic decline
120 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
love when ppl invest multiple billions intk VRAR development and all the potential applications they showcase in the marketing reels are just ways to make knowledge work 5% more efficient since that’s how they spend all their time
750 ♥ · 21 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
anyway I’ll order 5
244 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
oh you’re a superforecaster? what’s the weather next Tuesday
236 ♥ · 11 RT · x.com →