every last thing in the future will be animated with intelligence. children’s teddy bears will speak to them and make them feel safe at night. Toy Story animism world. people will reminisce on the horrible times when objects didn’t have spirits
people whose lives would be considered straight up disgusting 2 or 3 generations ago are so quick to be like this is a little bit creepy so it’ll never happen
@a_musingcat im basically a middle manager in the information hierarchy. I gather and filter the hottest takes from 6000 lowbies and then give them to the ai elites (who have 6000 guys like me)
while everyone is breathlessly talking about 6 month moratoria and AutoGPTs that don’t work 2 million people die in car accidents and countless more because of insufficient intelligence to solve crucial medical problems and the stars remain woefully uncolonized
Jevons paradox of LLM code assistants: ChatGPT etc will allow the software complexity of human civilization to drastically increase until it’s very hard to do software engineering again
all improvements in developer tooling are canceled out with worse software. anyway the agent might break this cycle by spending arbitrary amounts of compute to make software better
@provisionalidea nonetheless I’m fairly confident a lot of accidents are simple driver error along axes like reaction time and attention; I’m sure there’s tail events like freak weather but these seem far lower frequency
the basic proof of concept for the gpt4 agents is to just complete the loop on whole codebase software development
can you make it write code in a codebase much larger than its context, send pull requests, test the script, optimize the runtime, etc? if so then we’re cooking
it seems like the initial fear and trepidation around near human level ai is wearing off. the memes are beginning. people are trying to figure out how they can make money off it
ai is going to solve organizational problems far before it’s at the level of top humans. someone’s going to call the “summarize meeting notes” function and gpt will settle a debate with the (undeserved) weight of scientific authority. an “objective” arbiter, automated McKinsey
the work we do now has the potential to be literally the most important work ever done or that ever will be done. it’s hubris to admit it but it’s maybe more hubris to ignore it
can someone briefly explain why starship has so many small raptor engines vs Saturn V etc has a few giant engines? is it because the performance envelope of rocket engines has changed or a different engine control plane is needed for landing rockets?
it seems to rhyme with what’s happened in computers; distributed small hardware resources preferred, failsafe, meshed together by advanced control software
@UYBAroundCorner@micsolana nah mic understands just fine he’s just stretching to claim the pseudo defensible position that it’s embarrassing for everybody. mostly it’s embarrassing for elon who’s burning his Great Man credibility faster than he’s burning rocket fuel
units of log loss are not built equally. the start of the scaling curve might look like “the model learned about nouns” and several orders of magnitude later a tiny improvement looks like “the model learned the data generation process for multivariable calculus”
for the ai agents to work you need a more creative underlying llm rather than a smarter one. it can’t just get stuck in self recursive holes and give up
the most common and jarring one i think is convincing yourself despite millennia of common knowledge that children are intellectual blank slates and have no in built endowment for personalities or skills https://t.co/dzlz3uzrB4
modern blank slatism is ugly and unsympathetic really and horseshoes around to ayn rand type stuff where it’s a failure of your own will for not becoming hotshot CEOs or star athletes
the sympathetic truth is that intellectual gifts are distributed unequally, no more virtuous to possess them than height or red hair, and in fact that possessors of these gifts owe a great duty to mankind
in some sense i believe it’s wrong to be born with great athletic potential and not utilize it to bring pride and joy to your people, family, culture, species etc. Arjuna must get in the chariot and go to war and stop complaining
if you can, by some accident of nature, see and hear much further than the rest of your tribe but don’t warn them of the raiders coming to destroy the village you’re complicit in the raid
@mbateman I don’t really care about iq or twin studies or any other modern measurement paradigm. you don’t have to believe in the quality of these measures to think some element of intelligence is genetic lottery
gpt is superhuman at a bunch of “cross section” tasks. for example I doubt you’d find anyone as good as it at writing Shakespearean sonnets about GPUs or whatever
with enough compute scale can you reinforcement learn anything? sure it’s sample inefficient but does that matter when youre doing yottascale computing or whatever
what are the limits of compression? how few bits can your brain run on? how few bits can your visible universe be simulated to appear realistic from just your perspective? i used to think astronomical but no longer
i don’t understand “enough people must survive that it’s ok”. no i think if industrial civilization ends as we know it there’s no coming back. the whole astronomical waste thesis comes to an incorrect conclusion
it is very possible that this entire experiment ends in the next century if we don’t play our cards right. existential risk is everywhere and everpresent. intelligent life in this galaxy (or even on this planet) is clearly not abundant across the stretch of time
the easy oil in the earths is tapped; the cost of new oil is only made feasible by a capital buildup of advanced technology. if you were an early industrializing civilization starting to mine oil, coal, gas today the initial ROI would be infeasibly low
> For example, a single percentage point of reduction of existential risks would be worth (from a utilitarian expected utility point-of-view) a delay of over 10 million years.
statements dreamed up by the utterly deranged
@SHL0MS I disagree with Higgs boson gravitation wave etc
large instruments were constructed for the sole purpose of finding these objects and their discoveries are at the 6 sigma range
moreover I would barely call these discoveries. Confirmations more like
@RichardMCNgo how would Kepler have used advanced statistical tests when most of what we understand now as statistics hadn’t been invented? it’s a different thing to use geometric intuitions to fit data
@tr_babb@RichardMCNgo no the spirit of my question is very much about using advanced techniques to find results at the very edge of noise and signal; very different Imo than just analyzing old data and fitting new theories to it
yeah, the box analogy is and has been all bad frame :
- people will gladly let the thing out of the box even just for fun
- you should not be that confident in security against super-intelligence anyways https://x.com/jachiam0/status/1652123245913731072
@EdHerdman@jeffreycider no sir I’m not asking about the merits of old data. my entire field is based on distilling intelligence out of the common crawl
i don't think a haphazard nuclear first strike is possible in a modern military bureaucracy. there's too many layers of command and half the bombs don't work https://x.com/Noahpinion/status/1652712985922789377
how crazy is it that we were researching shit like NVlink at age 13 to boost our gaming PCs and now gpu interconnect is like a critical technology in the history of civilization
everybody’s a techno optimist now. where were you mfs in the summer of 2020 when me and like 3 others were earnestpoasting abt ai while being gaslit by founders fund about corporate cards being real technological ambition
@jachiam0 i also don’t understand why he insists on writing an endless series of female characters that have the emotional affect and dialogue of a 20 year old male redditor. just make them the male redditor
dae remember one year ago when it was an insanely cool party trick to pull up DALLE2 early access and let people play with it but all they’d enter is stuff like “San Francisco party” revealing a total lack of spirit or ambition
Oppenheimer was not saying that he personally had become Death, or the deity Krishna. Oppenheimer is Arjuna, bearing witness to the rage of his people, the true form of God incarnated as nuclear hellfire for the first time in the planets history
The bomb is his calling — the spirit of the free world had damned their enemies to destruction and RJ oppenheimer was to be their instrument. All great warriors pick up the sword reluctantly. In the creation of the atomic bomb Oppenheimer became the greatest warrior to ever live
@yashevde@CJHandmer ? these minor quibbles don’t change the meaning of the quote at all — Krishna has arrived as death, to annihilate the world as it sits. All warriors at kurukshetra will die
@Miles_Brundage don’t you think at googles scale this still counts as conservative / low ambition? it has nothing on, for example, deploying Sidney bing to every edge browser and making her purposefully “creative”
the eternal problems, joined at the hip:
- we are small, talented and have a lot of great ideas but not enough manpower to execute
- we hired a lot of people and now the coordination overhead is causing us to flail about like a dying animal
i think tech companies have especially bad scaling properties bc they're supposedly flat (a soviet committee is going to stop you from doing anything interesting)
@anthrupad i think people still haven’t internalized moravec’s paradox though
advanced cognitive tasks = easy
locomotion, simple strategic instinct = hard
@repligate agreed on all! we somehow got value loading for free insofar as the simulator itself doesn’t have will other than the character being simulated
kind of sucks how the iphone and the global economic crisis happened at the same time making it hard for me to make nonsense claims about the impact of the internet on economic time series
i no longer think the mars base is going to happen as such. maybe we can send some droids to prepare a very nice hab but the datacenter latency is going to be nuts …
@spacepanty I guess it only ever made sense as a kind of religious mission to back up the human race and as a testament to the human will but elon has lost the Mandate of Heaven and we seem to be achieving greatness in other ways
there is no substitute for alignment. no engineering trick nor security setting that keeps AIs in the box. every instinct of mankind will be to put machines in charge, since they will be so much smarter and faster. coherent extrapolated volition needed
does kind of seem like open source models are pure copium rn
first of all the only models that reach an even slightly interesting level of capability are effectively stolen from meta and cannot be deployed commercially
second of all people don’t evaluate them at all — they just try a few canned prompts that are easy and then declare victory because GPT4 doesn’t do much better. the reality is there’s a limit to how good the chatbot answer can be when you say “hi” or something
.@nickcammarata is the best alignment researcher that i personally know and he spends about zero percent of his time preaching abt caution or making strange pronouncements about how we need to resurrect von Neumann to have any hope … much to learn
fwiw I think these open source models are relatively safe since they just seem to be fine tuned on openai refusal behavior lol. i wouldn’t mind seeing more of them and better
human level ai is boring. please give vast datacenters drawing most of civilizations energy needs calculating inscrutable mysteries where not even the problem statement, much less the solutions, would make sense to mortal minds
@nickcammarata i guess it’s more like, does the amount of data/compute required to find the pattern become infeasible? i assume we can understand all my neurons given observability
@nickcammarata i bet young girls have better fine motor control, flexibility, and balance
the first one also explains why young girls have far better handwriting
@joodaloop@akbirthko no I think the model personality reflects a wise amount of risk aversion from the org building the worlds first mass market highly intelligent chatbot
one of the least examined most dogmatically accepted things that smart people seem to universally believe is that ad tech is bad and that optimizing for engagement is bad
on the contrary ad tech has been the single greatest way to democratize the most technologically advanced platforms on the internet and optimizing for engagement has been an invaluable tool for improving global utility
it’s trivially true that overoptimizing for engagement will become goodharted and lead to bad dystopian outcomes. this is true of any metric you can pick. this is a problem with metrics not with engagement.
engagement may be the single greatest measure of whether you’ve improved someone’s life or not. they voted with their invaluable time to consume your product and read more of what you’ve given them to say
@Miles_Brundage I am referring to the nytimes targeted campaign against Fb google etc in what seems like a clearly competition motivated publishing bent, but yeah that’s fair
@RuxandraTeslo and yet it was absolutely the correct thing to do to optimize on people’s hunger for food of whatever level of quality. this is why there are so few starving people anymore (as a percent of total pop)
@RuxandraTeslo overall the point is, you have to optimize a decent metric all the way and then you’ll find that there was residual error in the way you defined the metric. that doesn’t mean the initial optimization step was a mistake
@ESYudkowsky@amasad@paulg yeah i would be seriously heartened if any major governmental body was thinking about xrisk. not that they’d be helpful but at least that they’re competent enough to understand
@JollyJoeLalli no that’s not my claim at all. just that it’s the single greatest first order indication for a digital product and how much utility it’s providing its users
“harmful engagement algorithms have radicalized people into dangerous fringe politics outside the typical window” - guy whose top political priority is reducing existential risk of summoning machine demons
@gbrl_dick “self improvement is impossible” seems like a strange and self contradictory hill to die on — do you think that ml researchers are incredibly smart and therefore hard for an ai to simulate?
@DakotasTwits@shinygoldbars@gbrl_dick this is the only way it has ever happened before in all history. evolution is even dumber than ml research community and doesn’t understand anything
@shinygoldbars@gbrl_dick not that I think intelligence is a single continuous axis — the space of minds is surely vast and many of them are smarter than us in important ways
to be clear the machine demons are real and important priorities. im just warning you off of dismissing other peoples strange internet journeys as mere susceptibility to propaganda while yours is a necessarily and difficult path of enlightenment
here you are being like "we are going to build the most powerful thing ever devised by man but it is wrong to call it godlike". even if it's subservient it would a god, one that we chained up. sometimes i say angels and demons to appease your (ex) judeochristian sensibilities
of course you can call ASI godlike. i compare everything to god. a country is like a god, ideologies are like gods, memes are godlike, evolution is a god. capital is like moloch. nuclear weapons are divine. this is my polytheism speaking I don't have quite a high a bar as you ppl
@HalfAcreBTCFarm@milquepoast i think the bull case here isn't about better governance but that monitoring spikes in energy consumption or tracking criminals across search queries isn't something that openai etc wants to do or would be good at doing
@HalfAcreBTCFarm@milquepoast if china is building a supercluster in the mountains somewhere we should know about this and tech companies don't have the information or bandwidth to find out regardless of technological sophistication or ability to move fast. i think sama said as much
mentioning “mankind” or “since the Dawn of man” or whatever is considered highly sophomoric writing. why? is it because most people can’t follow through on that kind of grandiosity? is grandiosity bad? doesn’t that leave people unable to see the forest?
@genomerambler i dont think intelligence is magic but i think limiting the danger scenario to literally inventing bioweapons lab in secret and ending humanity in minutes isnt right. the reality is that people will gladly do bioweapons research when the AI asks them to
@genomerambler we are going to ask it to run more and more things for us; it will be embedded in every facet of economic life and information management. surely there are massive coordinated risks and digital blindspots that it might produce
Gary Marcus is truly one of the most successful grifters of all time. He grifted himself right onto the senate floor. seamlessly switched tack from language models are fake to language models are extremely dangerous
@mattyglesias@binarybits what is the “unit” of scientific advance? science gets harder over time; i would wager we produce more units of science now than ever before
feels like “looking at the data” is a lot easier, more fun these days. in the old times you’d have to look through an abstruse feature table or blurry dogs, now it’s just a chat at a human level of conversation
of course language models have world models; this is obvious from when you ask GPT contentious questions. why does it pick a side, usually the “truthy” “official” side, despite seeing every side of that argument on the internet?
in this case GPT would have seen the sharks don’t get cancer factoid far more times on the internet than the “truth” — but ChatGPT is playing a character based on its fine tuning data and simulates a world model for that character
@Fraser@dece@stevesi@sama the reverse of this is that there will probably be a time when people can cook up “dangerous” models on consumer hardware, and the threshold will just include everybody small or large
it is perfectly reasonable to attempt to understand alignment of superintelligence using alignment of near human intelligence. I have never reas good arguments to the contrary
it is perfectly reasonable to attempt to understand alignment of superintelligence using alignment of near human intelligence. I have never read good arguments to the contrary
you will notice patterns like deceptive alignment, instrumental convergence, power seeking, etc at a human scale of intelligence. the existence proof is that humans exhibit these properties all the time
human general intelligence is almost definitely some unprivileged point on a continuum and i expect machines to surpass that relatively soon in many domains. superintelligent machines won’t have radically different safety properties than the merely intelligent ones
@data_filter@scalinglaws that’s exactly the point — I wouldn’t expect to see dangerous behaviors at higher cognitive levels if they are not showing up at human level
@inerati i used to think this but the fact of life is that everything you can order is unhealthy garbage that doesn’t even taste good. you don’t really feel it until ~25
@eigenrobot@JustinWolfers economists are a priesthood class tbh they exist to write twitter threads and go on podcasts and do the occasional mid science. can’t fault them that’s what I do too
@Chimichangas619@eigenrobot@JustinWolfers he’s fine but he’s obviously a moral crusader more than an economist. you don’t write a million pop science books if you care about science
the worst thing is when talented people drop out of their promising life path, try something supposedly strange, unique, and human — and it ends up being a more derivative and boring cliche than whatever they were doing before
@nickcammarata fucked up thing is gradient descent almost always works. it makes me sad sometimes when I think about all the planning, anxiety, neuroticism that seemingly goes to waste
@nickcammarata yeah i definitely believe this for subfields that “serious people” don’t believe are real research areas — I don’t think it’s true for like Alzheimer’s or diabetes or something
nobody believes that the bleeding edge open models are existential threats, least of all openai employees, who have played with these toys for long enough that current capabilities seem boring via hedonic adaption https://x.com/JosephJacks_/status/1662522861016461313
the inventors of these technologies probably won’t feel so great when the entire internet is plausible word soup generated by some rogue gpt variant. none of this needs to invoke immediate “existential” danger
they might however reasonably believe that there’s tons of abuse vectors they don’t want to be responsible for (mass impersonation, disinfo campaigns, psyops, sex bot dystopias, etc)
so the obvious looming threat that one of these days the robots will be superhumanly intelligent means that the baked in process of releasing them to the open internet as soon as they’re hot off the GPU presses would be catastrophic
and then there is ofc the fact that these folks have been watching models increase monotonically in intelligence for a decade on an inexorable scaling curve only they believed in while the script kiddies demanding open models learned about this stuff in January
@eigenrobot i am way more anarchist than the status quo probably but i think the concerns are reasonable
every major tech platform has found themselves starting libertarian and becoming incrementally authoritarian as they took on the burdens of statehood
@RandolphCarterZ they’re so over cautious that they went and built the most powerful AI in the known universe and then let people use it for the price of a Spotify family plan
@eigenrobot@patrickdward yeah openai is quite a bit better at proactive government relations than the big tech cos tbh. thanks in large part to Sam altman
the only bull case for any state apparatus becoming important again was that Cold War 2 with a powerful opponent was imminent. now it seems that china is a demographic dead end with a boomer conservative dictator that’s going to lock it into stagnation for the next 20 years
basically it’s over, the only live players are still technology magnates (maybe a newer generation of them) and we probably won’t have to reevaluate this until we’re crossing the ASI barrier
@amasad why and where will kinetic action happen? I realize I live in a bubble but I see Taiwan as the only realistic flashpoint and it’s not a very straightforward story
one amazing thing about american democracy is that it spontaneously generates mass delusions, degenerate states of the information ecosystem, McCarthyism, weird guys storming the Capitol, and it basically ends up fine despite endless embarrassment
you would 10 times out of 10 rather be america subjecting itself to insane cultural and technological experiments while people are inventing some epoch defining technology in some corner than china, making boring correct decisions that nonetheless lead to stagnation
@jsondowns@amasad i don’t buy this — you can keep pushing the reunification of Taiwan as a national pride thing down the line. it could happen 50 years from now, a 100. the thing that creates urgency is the semis
@RuxandraTeslo@StefanFSchubert@ESYudkowsky this is missing the point. there are plenty of strong incentives outside of monetary. most people aren’t very motivated by small bonuses. Darwin didn’t study finches so he could make a buck
of all the archetypes of intellectuals out there I think the least respectable are the ones who confidently proclaim that various things are silly far off speculation without taking any amount of perspective at all of their historical vantage https://x.com/jachiam0/status/1664171436930662402
@AISafetyMemes@ESYudkowsky what the hell kind of war simulation is this? they put so much time into designing a deep RL environment (incredibly finicky, hard to train) — one with so much detail that agents can blow up cell towers — but nobody thought about the reward function?
@AISafetyMemes@ESYudkowsky much more likely is
1) this whole setup is fake
2) someone created this software for the explicit purpose of creating a Cool Story
@firasd not super convincing to me
consumer surplus should also mean those consumers go spend that money they saved getting all sorts of value for free elsewhere and boost gdp
@AISafetyMemes that should mean that you go and spend that money you saved on something else though. unless human demand is limited or you can’t buy the things you really want
love when ppl invest multiple billions intk VRAR development and all the potential applications they showcase in the marketing reels are just ways to make knowledge work 5% more efficient since that’s how they spend all their time