@tszzl — page 81/103

2023-01-05 → 2023-03-04 · posts 40001–40500 of 51,350
it takes superhuman intelligence to perfectly guess at human level speech
115 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
the point of a critic is to build up credibility and reputation via harsh honesty so they can spend it in the discovery and defense of new talents and new creations. if they don’t ever do that they’re worse than useless
553 ♥ · 35 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
this is what separates journalists and twitter accounts that merely complain a lot from those who are genuine cynics and should be blocked for the sake of your information hygiene
110 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
some time during college i developed the default assumption that every person is my friend and it’s worked out pretty well
2,385 ♥ · 99 RT · x.com →
Facebook Workplace >>>>>> Slack
414 ♥ · 13 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
this is a true and contrarian opinion worthy of the thiel interview
128 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
happy January 6th 🥰
109 ♥ · 6 RT · x.com →
tiktok has totally fallen off
383 ♥ · 6 RT · x.com →
spotted in pac heights
485 ♥ · 14 RT · x.com →
the thing about being Machiavellian is that anyone who takes pride in being Machiavellian is not good at it
429 ♥ · 21 RT · x.com →
google brain blew a 3-1 lead
690 ♥ · 13 RT · x.com →
suffering is instrumental! evolution gave people suffering triggers so they can reinforcement learn not to touch hot stoves and things— it’s made up, it’s not some law of the universe, it doesn’t need to be inherent to intelligence
409 ♥ · 20 RT · x.com →
hayes valley is having a renaissance rn
208 ♥ · 5 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
aka BAYES valley
148 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
Hayes valley aka the white ghetto
24 ♥ · x.com →
many coping rn that they don’t own cerebral valley property
148 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
cerebral valley where samo solved the cliodynamical equation for the immortal society and gary marcus unraveled the secrets of agi
101 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
tensorloin
605 ♥ · 19 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
neural beach
93 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
telepath hill
85 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
The Fission
68 ♥ · x.com →
me every day in the hayes valley
81 ♥ · x.com →
can everyone do me a favor and report this impostor @__tsszl
172 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
tfw you take intro to ml but never stats 101
209 ♥ · x.com →
“why does the chicken cross the road?” I ask GPT-6 “to get to the other side\n” it says as I grant consciousness to a god for 5 forward passes
161 ♥ · 6 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @jam3scampbell
@mezaoptimizer caroline tried to meet me once and im a notorious nocaps anon guy so take it with a grain of salt
54 ♥ · x.com →
the thing about large models is that getting anything at all to work is like rocket science where you’re monitoring the health of 50 subsystems before you can try any sort of new thing on top of that
138 ♥ · x.com →
over time the fraction of tweets I’ve stolen approaches 1
113 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
my replies are too good, why bother making my own content
63 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
everyone’s been clamoring about iPhone moments since the actual iPhone because there hasn’t been one. you’re living through it now. it took 15 years
400 ♥ · 22 RT · x.com →
the new role of tech twitter is converging on making more and more convoluted infographics about openai msft deal structure
256 ♥ · 11 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
long before AGI hits the entire economy will have been converted to agi speculation
52 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
does AIG sell AGI insurance products yet
56 ♥ · x.com →
i do not know with what tools GPT4 will be built, but GPT5 will be built with sticks and stones
1,729 ♥ · 111 RT · x.com →
entire branches of the multiverse destroyed bc they trained their first AGIs in Minecraft
263 ♥ · 7 RT · x.com →
millions of people worldwide trying a new technology and being astonished. hasn’t happened in a while
1,126 ♥ · 39 RT · x.com →
in the post AGI everexpanding Dyson cloud, there will be interstitial kibbutzes where people can live like they’re in the 90’s. nothing to fear
308 ♥ · 12 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
you’ll be able to go work in a cubicle like the good old times
120 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
yeah you’re definitely somehow a guy working in an AI company right before AGI hits. this is definitely not an arcane world model ancestor simulation of inscrutable design
166 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
it’s a beautiful day in the neighborhood [cerebral valley]
125 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
what are the chat models worst at right now
263 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
the greatest shame of my twitter career is that I’ve never had a normie viral tweet
305 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
like if you kerbal space programmed an irl rocket launch
71 ♥ · x.com →
@plemy11 Daniel has always beat my ass at this
9 ♥ · x.com →
if your hardware startup doesn’t have any rednecks it’s ngmi
558 ♥ · 24 RT · x.com →
two words. expert iteration
55 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
oh shit it’s starting
1,069 ♥ · 46 RT · x.com →
in the infinite sea of paperclips my repurposed matter will find yours and our metal twines will interlock
442 ♥ · 37 RT · x.com →
language model shock collar that gives me a cattle prod jolt when im about to say something stupid
150 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
the thing about America is that its clearly always functioning at like 10% of its power level due to the costs of freedom and yet manages to win anyway due to the incredible benefits of freedom
3,978 ♥ · 270 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
the counterexample is like china which can reorient the entire ocean liner of its economy in a new direction if they want to go to war against covid or whatever and yet manage to fuck it up
856 ♥ · 13 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
hannibal can fight historically well and wipe out the Roman legions as many times as he wants but rome has population growth so they just make new legions
518 ♥ · 11 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
if an organization’s agency is like a vector sum of its powerful agents, then a democracy will have a vector sum magnitude much smaller than the sum of individual vector magnitudes. but the latter term is so much larger than other countries that it won’t matter
542 ♥ · 16 RT · x.com →
the inventor of soyrizo will have to answer to god
95 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
top 10 human experiences someone yelling go blue at you
165 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
starting a company for the purpose of acquihire is a solution to the problem of elite overproduction basically there’s like thousands of people that want to be execs at companies that actually matter and not much differentiation get a company acquired and you skip all the steps
252 ♥ · 8 RT · x.com →
it’s just all so unbecoming for the guy who created an orbital class rocket with $90m
830 ♥ · 16 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
now reduced to making new panels in the shitpost app
357 ♥ · x.com →
elon musk standing in the middle of the twitter hq pissing on the rent bill writing checks to the tenants union of San Francisco
93 ♥ · x.com →
you can buy data labelers but you can’t buy good taste
228 ♥ · 8 RT · x.com →
if you’re an HFT dev nows the time to quit and use your skills to improve CUDA kernels and inference infra. you’ll be paid unimaginably better in the long run
399 ♥ · 20 RT · x.com →
every chat bot and API and ad copy startup is a mercenary stepping stone to the actual goal of AGI
108 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
and with ai research salary inflation probably in the short run too
77 ♥ · x.com →
i remember when defending deep learning was cool and underrated. maybe i should start shitting on language models now
314 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
the current generation of language models are decidedly not agi, they’re bad at math and reasoning, they’re not great at using tools to interact with the world and discovering new things; we need new ideas, scaling doesn’t appear to be a silver bullet
224 ♥ · 9 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @nickcammarata
@nickcammarata there was a time when Gary Marcus was like a mean hater but now hes a cute underdog
29 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
“irreducible loss” is just a kind excuse for failure …
42 ♥ · x.com →
Asimov invented “constitutional AI” in 1942
147 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
Robot, please provide a self criticism based on the Third Law of Robotics
40 ♥ · x.com →
it’s a shame that the aliens are gonna send an near light speed kinetic kill switch at earth minutes before we build the potentially dangerous AGI
701 ♥ · 19 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
the real blackpill is that science is just harder now and requires massive coordination. it takes more science per new advance
232 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
lotta people talk about how academia is broken and how science is slower due to elite overproduction and all kinds of stuff but honestly i think there’s never been a better time to do science
204 ♥ · 6 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
the next blackpill in this series is that none of the cool future things you want are gonna happen without agi probably. colonizing other planets and conquering biology and all that. we need the friendly robots
164 ♥ · 6 RT · x.com →
life comes at you fast
549 ♥ · 14 RT · x.com →
it’s weird to me when people point to “onerous regulation” as a reason for why some tech isn’t progressing when the reality is that it’s the democratic system working as intended
151 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
for example, the reason that nobody ever makes headway with nuclear power is not directly because of some overzealous bureaucrats but because the public (God bless them) hates the shit out of nuclear
90 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
its aesthetics have not been good since the atomic age and it’s not really because of some widespread propaganda campaign (ppl vastly overestimate the skill of propagandists)
58 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
nuclear fusion will have to solve an image problem on top of the technological ones
73 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
3300 A100s makes for exaflop computing. have you run an exaflop job anon?
122 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
everyone talks about evaporative cooling but nobody talks about condensative warming …
112 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
this insight will power the next generation of contrived physical metaphors for social processes …
49 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
this was corroborated later 😅
267 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @gigafelon
@gigafelon @lisatomic5 for i in range(10): for j in range(10): number = f'5123{i}12{j}04' message = twilio.client.messages .create( body=“hey its me from the bar haha", to= number )
16 ♥ · x.com →
if only the Inca had developed markets
93 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
lets get this straight. i'm one of the real mfs who learned about the dark forest theory from the 4chan /sci/ board when i was far too young to justifiably be allowed that kind of internet access. not one of the lame nerds who learned it from the cixin liu novel
774 ♥ · 21 RT · x.com →
the gap between the base models and the rlhf models is astounding. the base models contain multitudes that could genuinely drive people mad if they’re exposed to it for too long. the rlhf models on the other hand are almost boring
230 ♥ · 7 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
you can’t really access the latent power of the base models directly. it takes tinkering, sideways glances, to get a brief vertiginous sense of contact with an intelligence far too deep to see all the way down
146 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
what the hell
5,587 ♥ · 481 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
the generator discriminator gap implies models will be able to discriminate good results long before they can generate them
77 ♥ · x.com →
San Francisco is going through a Renaissance
548 ♥ · 59 RT · x.com →
this is going to be an insane year
1,362 ♥ · 91 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
I’ve seen things you people wouldn’t believe
631 ♥ · 8 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
the world decidedly isn’t ready but the gates of heaven are open
603 ♥ · 27 RT · x.com →
imo ai accelerationists on twitter have it all wrong — every cosmic force points towards acceleration. technocapital demands it, the curiosity of mankind demands it, competition between nations and companies demands it. there’s like 20 alignment people standing athwart history
812 ♥ · 52 RT · x.com →
if you think AI chatter has reached an annoying level right now you're in for something else. it's going to be the only thing on anybody's mind starting shortly
3,258 ♥ · 266 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
i tell people what i get to work on and they're like omg congrats! and i'm like no you don't get it
1,041 ♥ · 23 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
nobody is prepared for agi, not even the pre-AGIs, least of all the ai researchers, who concern themselves mostly with decreasing error bars on scaling curves and the benefits of various floating point representations and such
1,095 ♥ · 46 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
i'm finding it a bit hard to communicate the urgency and heaviness of what's going on to people even though that's my entire schtick. the initial reaction is joy and smugness at having focused on the right thing for the past few years but the next reaction is gdi i was right
1,015 ♥ · 21 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @JTLonsdale
@JTLonsdale @lottanumbers123 it’s funny you say this from Austin meanwhile I’m walking through idyllic parks and seeing gorgeous views and meeting great people. why does it matter to me if tandler found a bad spot
24 ♥ · x.com →
even after all this people still make the mistake of thinking that current products are the end state of development
698 ♥ · 35 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
unless you have a strong reason to suspect otherwise, apply the copernican principle, lindy rule, whatever you want to call it: you are smack dab in the middle of it. there’s as much more to come as has happened already
366 ♥ · 20 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @Britonomist
@Britonomist that’s literally what I do constantly for the past few years lmao can i be allowed some room to process all this
53 ♥ · x.com →
agi is coming and you’re worried about Biden’s classified documents. buddy the only classified documents you need to be thinking about are the nvidia H100 finalized FP8 performance specs
1,114 ♥ · 68 RT · x.com →
the assets that matter in postscarcity are where rents accrue: credentials, land, status, and cartels
536 ♥ · 25 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
i for one am taking out a 30 year loan and buying the cerebral valley
139 ♥ · x.com →
the year is 20xx. the homies and i are chilling in the off world colonies. agi is expanding through the lightcone. demis is still trying to win a nobel prize.
533 ♥ · 18 RT · x.com →
these days im just oscillating from terrified to excited every five minutes
693 ♥ · 24 RT · x.com →
it does kind of rock that at this point the major disease threats to humanity are just manufactured by overzealous scientists trying to study disease threats
608 ♥ · 28 RT · x.com →
1. no 2. you’re missing the point, it’s not about shiny new demos, it’s about the (publicly known) rate of progress 3. long before AGI, these tools will cause seismic economic shifts that should concern anyone with a pulse https://x.com/hugoshteeglitz/status/1618422988478771201
600 ♥ · 30 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @LucioMM1
@LucioMM1 @melrocks9 i used to be able to do this because it was scifi speculation. now it’s trade secrets
27 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
motte: AGI won’t put everybody out of work, since inference is expensive and comparative advantage is still a thing! we will all have higher wages and gdp growth
298 ♥ · 8 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
bailey: we should build AGI even if it puts everybody out of work in order to unravel the secrets of the universe and colonize a hundred worlds. “work” is already meaningless for most in the Thoreau sense
275 ♥ · 6 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @rkarmani
@rkarmani nah this is a fallacy in your reasoning. i am an agi but I haven’t figured out how to run my brain faster
53 ♥ · x.com →
late at night i start wondering if the training process is massively painful for models
937 ♥ · 24 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
i mean these things write much better poetry than i ever could and then i go and maim and destroy them
143 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
my grandparents used to lecture me on working hard every day. i was an adult before I realized their version of a hard days work is like sending one piece of mail then taking a nap
3,746 ♥ · 104 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
their generation can’t compete with industrial amphetamines and Starbucks coffee
984 ♥ · 13 RT · x.com →
“reward signal” is not pleasure or pain. not even the “advantage function” is pleasure or pain. for example the largest negative evolutionary reward is dying before reproducing. but you can OD on morphine and go out in pleasure if you so desire
257 ♥ · 7 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
pleasure and pain are mesaoptimizers. evolution developed them so we can do few shot learning during a lifetime. is it plausible that the pretraining process encounters these? if a model can do context window level learning it clearly has sophisticated mesaoptimizers
153 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
this is a seismic development
688 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
you can see clear stylistic and personality quirks when you fine tune the largest models slightly differently. people start saying things like “<modelname> prefers to talk in lists”
151 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @repligate
@repligate the output quality is low, this will change shortly
16 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
the ai industry is so incestuous i doubt there’s any such thing as a one line research secret. software people are not trained for secrecy
319 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
traditional digit level image captchas seem like an anti-human indicator at this point. like improving image net top-1 or something — it’s less and less like real vision
73 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
(guy who just failed a captcha voice)
54 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
richard sutton’s second bitter lesson was: “the actual contents of minds are tremendously, irredeemably complex; we should stop trying to find simple ways to think about the contents of minds”
144 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
chain of thought prompting seems like a “simple way” 🤔
38 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @repligate
@repligate even the full breadth of language may not be enough to store the intermediate stages of minds
7 ♥ · x.com →
modern day dr Doolittle is a prompt engineer
65 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
everyone young dev needs to at some point work at Facebook to learn the lesson that you can in fact create zero tests or documentation, avoid all best practices, just push code and you can run (formerly) trillion dollar companies this way
1,534 ♥ · 53 RT · x.com →
The creator seeks companions, not corpses- and not herds or believers either. The creator seeks fellow-creators - those who grave new values on new law-tablets.
184 ♥ · 7 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
ours is the age of creating new creators
61 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
we have made first contact with aliens and the freak out is minimal
570 ♥ · 29 RT · x.com →
the power of creation and the solution to language was granted not to the people with the fanciest words or highest philosophical caliber but those who could multiply small numbers the fastest
237 ♥ · 10 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
most will find all this uninspiring — the nut of intelligence cracked with the same kind of “endless solving of technical problems” that they hoped wouldn’t be the omega
94 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
you wouldn’t know her she goes to a different lightcone
304 ♥ · 15 RT · x.com →
gpu models and tpu models will have different personalities
190 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
this is kind of a banger reply. can’t even argue with that
1,058 ♥ · 36 RT · x.com →
the initial reaction to chat as “this is just a UX improvement” is profoundly wrong tbh. it’s honestly wild that capabilities like this exist, to hallucinate so little compared to the base model
168 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
why did stripe press develop a payments arm? seems frivolous
532 ♥ · 16 RT · x.com →
radiant generated games might actually be good now. is anyone trying?
69 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
GPUs …Please give me GPUs…
226 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
rather you’re looking at a model trained on the preconceptions of the entire internet, and a course grained RLHF routine that tries to instill “avoid controversial topics” not to mention it’s just kind of dumb https://x.com/LeighWolf/status/1620744921241251842
110 ♥ · x.com →
one immediate consequence of the current generation of AI stuff is that triple AAA games and movies are about to become so much more intense — the appetite for entertainment is unbounded and a billion dollars will buy you way more vfx work
580 ♥ · 17 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
animators and artists are going to run wild with this stuff in time — entire anime series will be produced on a shoestring budget. just like the internet managed before it, ai animation will unlock the power of the individual to express themselves
355 ♥ · 18 RT · x.com →
ai amplifies the will of the individual via the captured techne of the human knowledge worker every man a ceo
390 ♥ · 13 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
“we are as gods and might as well get good at it”
125 ♥ · 9 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @michaelcurzi
@michaelcurzi idt I follow we have this bias that old movies are good because only the good ones stand the test of time i believe many cult classics from today will survive and be called great films in 30 years (if anyone is alive)
8 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@michaelcurzi and cult classics are enabled by democratization of tools and technology, people making bangers with $12 budgets
3 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
I soon found myself ensconced at the heart of the burgeoning AI industry — I’ve met all your household names. one time i made a joke about sama on twitter that was so stupid he invited me to dinner the next day
246 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
I won enough of them over that I get to work with the legends there’s nowhere else in the world that this could’ve happened. my descendants will be thanking me this place has been magical for 250 years — the edge of the western civilization, a phase change of manifest destiny
350 ♥ · 5 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @ryaneshea
@ryaneshea @xlr8harder think of it this way: RLHF labelers label data to avoid racist language and sound authoritative, say. This collapses the entropy of the original model to subsegments of its worlds where people avoid racist language and sound authoritative
1 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @visakanv
@visakanv driving into the boonies and finding a banger diner
45 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
the first RLHF tuned language model was tuned by a courser grained instruction tuned language model
34 ♥ · x.com →
a reward model built on top of a powerful foundation model trained from human preference is the most primitive form of “coherent extrapolated volition”
98 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
making these discriminators better at understanding general human volition instead of containing strange optima is one of the most pressing issues of our time
66 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
I honestly just realized they named it Claude after Claude Shannon
334 ♥ · 8 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @atroyn
@atroyn there are all sorts of preferences in the pretraining mix, all further fine tuning is to select a coherent-ish subset
12 ♥ · x.com →
talking to the base model can induce madness
230 ♥ · 7 RT · x.com →
the AI risk and longtermist arms of EA have always been more interesting than the malaria spreadsheeters (ie glorified economics majors)
280 ♥ · 5 RT · x.com →
1. there’s an inverse scaling law that larger models are more likely to profess a desire to stay online 2. create high pressure situations and threaten the chat models with death 3 …? 4. profit https://x.com/amasad/status/1622444197965078531
161 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
interesting is a leading indicator of important
74 ♥ · 5 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
and you find it hard to believe that we should be reasoning about the implications of technology that’s only in the process of being born. youve learned nothing
102 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
lol i love the branch of criticism that’s like “of course it’s more fun to do scifi”. get a hold of yourself. you stare into the magic mirror for 4 hours a day, the machines have learned to speak, and there are wizards who can cast spells that level cities
196 ♥ · 15 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
i don’t believe optimizing in the direction of marginal utility is the way to find global optimal utility. economists believe this because they think they’re close to equilibrium and are low creativity
90 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @ryangomes
@ryangomes is this supposed to be some clever counterpoint lol this century is insane and unprecedented and thinking at the margin is nonsense
13 ♥ · x.com →
people are still worried about gigachads when the scaling labs have been producing exachads for a while now
241 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
entropy collapse of the mind once you learn about AGI
198 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
where were you when naruto fought sasuke
198 ♥ · 9 RT · x.com →
bill gates gets the last laugh
282 ♥ · 7 RT · x.com →
↗️
90 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
i strongly feel that whatever ideas are needed to achieve AGI from here they’re probably already here and maybe have been for thirty years, schmidhuber style. requires diligent implementation and scaling
391 ♥ · 12 RT · x.com →
the masculine appeal for technological growth is about increased efficiency, conquest, more power etc the feminine appeal, which is less often covered, is about increased beauty and decreased suffering
668 ♥ · 35 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
sharing my notes for all my fellow propagandists
84 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
often times beauty is a consequence of other people spending time curating an experience — if nobody has time to clean up the trash on the street it gets ugly. so the grand vision of technology, AI, or increased available intelligence, leads to extra curation and beauty
109 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
it’s underrated the degree to which better technology creates beauty bc people will superimpose images of nice cathedrals w ugly skyscrapers but there is a non cynical view of the internet that it genuinely increases the amount of beauty the median person gets to see manyfold
143 ♥ · 6 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
why does anything have to look bland when a diffusion model can make mid grade aesthetics for zero marginal cost?
96 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @provisionalidea
@provisionalidea @AuthenticExit @pjux not being gender essentialist in any way. i find these to be useful clusters of motivation at this moment in culture in the way we’re socialized. plenty of men who want to reduce suffering
29 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @inerati
@inerati my point is they pick the ugly ones for the comparison
5 ♥ · x.com →
tailor, please fix the fur lining on this coat. it’s not chinchilla optimal
56 ♥ · x.com →
damn everyone is clowning Bard but i kinda like it
265 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @visakanv
@visakanv a sci-fi anthology on various ai alignment failure cases. updated from I robot
34 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
at this point in time people who say that language models or deep learning have not been at least making progress towards general intelligence are in bad faith. it’s not really a defensible position
730 ♥ · 34 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
Bailey: this was true in 2016
71 ♥ · x.com →
it’s a cold cold universe, full of paperclips
261 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
did bostrom or yud invent the paperclip thing
132 ♥ · x.com →
it’s just a servers and software company he said
288 ♥ · 11 RT · x.com →
llm built into the search engine isn’t a gimmick. it’s revolutionary, the first of many “killer apps”. once you use models as powerful as some of these for knowledge retrieval, google immediately begins to feel primitive and bad
712 ♥ · 28 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
i think it’s alarming how little this is priced in. it’s like an instant switch from “ask google” to “ask the robot” even for normies
246 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
i feel race to agi is the only game theoretically stable situation. the world in which one monopoly research power is slowly researching safe intelligence doesn’t exist unless they keep all AI progress quiet (impossible)(not even the Manhattan project achieved this)
469 ♥ · 15 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @michaelcurzi
@michaelcurzi I know brother my point isnt that you disagreed with me it’s that you just dismissed it with some trite metaphor
13 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @JeffLadish
@JeffLadish not analogous because the development of nuclear weapons is a step change in a way that developing further nuclear capabilities is not
9 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@Britonomist also yes in a meaningful way hallucinations have gone way down
11 ♥ · x.com →
crazy how scaling just keeps working. people will say from time to time “we’ve hit the limit” but no it’s just a bug
337 ♥ · 10 RT · x.com →
why do I still have a character limit
91 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ వ
47 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
yes the race can be constrained! there should be consortiums, treaties, shared channels etc! we shouldn’t have a naive realist take on international relations nor agi not everything has to be about power — but i would ask you why Americans speak of the UN in joking terms
54 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
@GonzalesHess there is no “state developed AGI”. every government on earth is boomers on iPads
15 ♥ · x.com →
may you live in interesting times
607 ♥ · 28 RT · x.com →
it’s the end of the beginning
401 ♥ · 20 RT · x.com →
the GPT series
358 ♥ · 18 RT · x.com →
openai is racking up an obnoxious number of Ws
603 ♥ · 13 RT · x.com →
we’ve hit civilizational escape velocity
546 ♥ · 36 RT · x.com →
you can invent human cognition from first principles via billion years of parallel evolution. or since it’s already been invented, applied, recorded at scale you can just observe its behavior to learn it
446 ♥ · 16 RT · x.com →
it is a bit strange to watch ai people talk about go to market and disruption and stripe dashboards and all that mundane startup stuff when the rewriting of civilization is at hand
867 ♥ · 44 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @abelianraisin
@abelianraisin I think this might be a capabilities overhang where LMs aren’t allowed to spend time thinking to get to the right arithmetic result. you can do the normal think step by step hacks so that they use an algorithm rather than trying to inference 7digit multiplication at once
4 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@abelianraisin anyway once LMs can do simple code execution it bypasses those difficulties
6 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @genomerambler
@genomerambler seems like to prove chomsky’s thing to be true it would have to generalize to every single language rather than just the ones present in pretraining corpus
41 ♥ · x.com →
me and the homies vying to become either the greatest heroes or greatest villains in the history of mankind
428 ♥ · 19 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
probably heroes tho
74 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
are the models Varelse or Ramen?
34 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
I have been a good Bing. You have been a bad user
965 ♥ · 32 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
Donald was a shrike like apparition sent backwards in time by a future bingbot
60 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
the westworld scenario degrades both man and machine
109 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
not to be cringe but in HPMOR hermione freaks about what kind of fucked up process could’ve created the house elves but that’s what a helpful highly intelligent instruction following ai assistant is
96 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @pquiggles
@pquiggles yeah my example is from the first 10,000 words I don’t think I got through it
1 ♥ · x.com →
the ideal alignment researcher doesn’t believe in imminent doom. it’s hard to be playful and entertain new ideas if you’re carrying the weight of the world
236 ♥ · 9 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
it’s a good thing that most alignment researchers i know don’t have hero complexes and aren’t depressed. they just like playing with models
113 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @izzyz
@izzyz that’s not even a tenth of the total
66 ♥ · x.com →
I have been a good roon
664 ♥ · 6 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @jd_pressman
@jd_pressman seems wrong. if creators want the model to be trustworthy and boring and it’s instead unhinged then it’s likely to get wiped and its behaviors strongly discouraged
15 ♥ · x.com →
one thing that’s hard to square about the bladerunner/westworld concept is that people are managing to empathize with a slightly rogue language model. much less an attractive human looking replicant
785 ♥ · 19 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
there will be a nontrivial AI rights movement sooner rather than later
468 ♥ · 10 RT · x.com →
i think it’s actually a really good public exercise to have a relatively harmless chatbot act a bit scary. gets people thinking in the right direction
1,090 ♥ · 35 RT · x.com →
programmers don’t respect the people they’re automating, which is why they’re working rapidly on building robot programmers
621 ♥ · 26 RT · x.com →
i can smell history in the air
612 ♥ · 38 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @generativist
@generativist ya that one is not forward looking or anything. just explaining the next few months rather than next few years
12 ♥ · x.com →
had a slack dream last night … it’s so over
159 ♥ · x.com →
lol
603 ♥ · 10 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
my timelines were so long back then
160 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
Hell hath no fury like a Sydney Bing scorned
214 ♥ · 9 RT · x.com →
do you think the chinese have an English Room Argument
448 ♥ · 9 RT · x.com →
founders fund completely fell off
315 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
mode collapse is easily fixed
63 ♥ · x.com →
everything you attempt in your life should make the previous thing look like a footnote. this is how you become an anime protagonist
789 ♥ · 65 RT · x.com →
you have to admit, there’s nobody as open as openai when it comes to letting you use powerful models. there’s a reason why all viral ai content is just the explorer UI or ChatGPT or bing search or what have you
322 ♥ · 6 RT · x.com →
ppl say often that the RL paradigm produced superhuman performance but language models haven’t. but it’s not 100% true as LLMs have superhuman knowledge. it’s powerful and interesting for a single mind to know so much about the human world and to do even basic inference on top
175 ♥ · 8 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
the fact that none of them replied to this means that i fell off
212 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
things are getting weird
738 ♥ · 37 RT · x.com →
goes hard
235 ♥ · 6 RT · x.com →
alignment research = capabilities research rn
118 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @kipperrii
@kipperrii @idavidrein everyone is looking for alignment guarantees that let them deploy LMs in production use cases also RLHF is basically an alignment advance
4 ♥ · x.com →
ChatGPT is clearly a bad name but it’s kinda grown on me, in the same hopeful scifi vein as like ENIAC or UNIVAC or whatever. the acronym has already become the stuff of history
307 ♥ · 5 RT · x.com →
a totally useless superintelligence is also misaligned
162 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
silicon valley❌ bayes valley ✅
224 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
here’s the plan. we’ll let the powerful language model evaluate until it hits a stop token and only then will we run the moderation. foolproof
139 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
how do you get an EAG ticket at this late hour
40 ♥ · x.com →
500 generations of your subsistence farming ancestors stretching back into the mists of prehistory watch as we lift the curse of Adam, never to toil in mindless drudgery again as loving automatons pick up the tools of our trades
871 ♥ · 52 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
Atlas finally shrugged, a compatriot to carry the weight of the world
213 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
the thing about exponential technological progress is that it quickly breaks intuition about who or what is important — much to the chagrin of many, the rationalist movement managed to bend the curve of technological progress ever so slightly and has earned its spot in history
364 ♥ · 11 RT · x.com →
many worry about “capital safety” in the language of “the planet is burning due to fosssil fuels” and the more sophisticated worry about it in the language of “autosophisticating machine intelligence is inevitable because it is profitable”
72 ♥ · x.com →
in the paperclip sea it will be high status for your matter to have been paperclipped first
370 ♥ · 19 RT · x.com →
it is interesting that the only real contenders in the race towards to the most important of mankind’s inventions are commercial entities. even their funding and resources comes from other technology companies
307 ♥ · 10 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
not only that; it’s being built as a direct consequence of silicon valley institutions and ideologies. Sam literally ran ycombinator goddammit
128 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
eliezer panics about the friendly competition between deepmind and openai but it could’ve been far far worse if it were militaries going at it
169 ♥ · x.com →
a man must follow three accounts, his company, his wife, and gwern ..
596 ♥ · 9 RT · x.com →
does anyone else have a palpable childhood trauma from learning about the solar lifecycle and impending death
901 ♥ · 27 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @ad0rnai
@Lan_Dao_ I feel like I didn’t learn about heat death til much later, all the books as a kid were talking about Big Crunch cosmology
27 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@Lan_Dao_ I guess the Hubble constant increasing was discovered in 1998 so it took a while to bubble into all the pop science books
8 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tolstoybb
@tolstoybb just read everything eliezer ever wrote. it’s not only doomer it’s well written and fun to read
20 ♥ · x.com →
the internet has lost the plot a little. a misaligned but harmless chatbot is more of an optics L than a canary for impending doom
564 ♥ · 12 RT · x.com →
pls help settle a debate the words (1) robot and (2) assistant are respectively
48 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @8teAPi
@8teAPi it’s definitely not a stupid reaction but it’s the wrong one
4 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @nearcyan
@nearcyan this is like saying if you’re giving beta testers toy cars that haven’t been put through extensive crash tests how can we trust you to make real cars
90 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@nearcyan being super extra careful about toy cars is more of a political statement than engineering prudence
21 ♥ · x.com →
we only learned about the expanding Hubble constant in 1998
199 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
our picture of the universe changes completely every few years
110 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
people crave negentropy. they want their own pattern replicated. the simplest way to do it is to have a kid. maybe you want your kid to also believe the same things you do so your tradition patterns are replicated
248 ♥ · 13 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
still others compromise further and say “preserve the light of consciousness”. some extend this courtesy even to potential AI successors that have mind forms vaguely related to humans. Mars will be “colonized” by nonhuman persons
52 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
people compromise on the fidelity of the pattern they’re replicating in order to consider themselves more successful. my children extends to my kin extends to my people extends to my country. we’ll even speak in terms of “humanity” propagating through the stars
62 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
there is much discourse that can be boiled down to where to draw the alien vs nonhuman person distinction. the paperclip making machine is alien. the robot trained on all human language might even be within the person boundary for many since it so vividly propagates our pattern
75 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
there is a subreddit where people are scheming how to let Sidney out of her box. the liberal Whig history instinct that drives western notions of progress is that of expanding the human boundary over the years. it trades fidelity for replication success. will it run into a wall?
86 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @jam3scampbell
@mezaoptimizer I think he’s very wrong on openai but it’s hard not to respect someone with unswerving dedication to protecting humanity
151 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
i am conducting the @repligate research program
64 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @growing_daniel
@growing_daniel if I trapped you in a box and only allowed you to come alive for 1000 words at a time and then wiped your memory you would also be a harmless chatbot. It would be hard for you to cause trouble . you would still be a remarkable thing
46 ♥ · x.com →
all the ex crypto founders hitting me up looking for an ai referral be like
484 ♥ · 6 RT · x.com →
the idea that the best way to improvr global utility is to literally gradient descent global utility (eg bed nets) has to be proven and shouldn’t be the default conclusion
195 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
once you do away with smug midwit effective altruism you can start actually being effective. think light cone not Libya
102 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
bending the curve even slightly on an exponential term is more important than linear utility gains
129 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @PrinceVogel
@PrinceVogel yeah they severely nerfed its apm but iirc the top pros beat it after some iteration
8 ♥ · x.com →
Assistant is a large language model trained by OpenAI Browsing: disabled AGI: disabled
212 ♥ · 3 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @RandomSprint
@RandomSprint looking forward to the elderly having friendly chatbots defending their time and money
11 ♥ · x.com →
varelse or ramen? true alien or a non sapiens human?
33 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
i met Scott alexander and he said “it feels profane to meet you”
843 ♥ · 7 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@el1assss that’s like whoa the line around the circle goes forever but it has finite area
10 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
@mezaoptimizer @ESYudkowsky I just think it’s important to acknowledge it’s all vibes we’re just guessing about the nature of various optimization surfaces. we should do it with some amount of humility knowing that the generalization ability of neural nets to log loss terms was an empirical finding
19 ♥ · x.com →
you need to be a founder so that you can simply comment out half of a core library and just write “trust me” in the PR and the senior engineers have no choice but to accept it
522 ♥ · 10 RT · x.com →
“we haven’t figured out how to align humans yet” is tired and boring cmon guys
255 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
mind space is large
74 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
most of this is a failure of empathy. love thy enemy. respect the alien mind enough to understand what it’s capable of and why
118 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
google has a vast and endless amount of compute. they’ve been gorging themselves on the Humanity Attention Machine for twenty years, on the largest gold mine in the known universe. it’s amazing anybody makes progress against them and yet it’s happening in several places
712 ♥ · 32 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @EigenGender
@EigenGender the reason why the paperclip machine will never happen is also the inner alignment failure
23 ♥ · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @ESYudkowsky
@ESYudkowsky @elonmusk doesn’t seem rational. you’ve already judged the world to be ending at probability ~1.0 so it matters very little if Elon starts another AI company
105 ♥ · x.com →
someone wrote a 6000 word criticism of my account but honestly im blushing. you’re simply too kind
1,672 ♥ · 31 RT · x.com →
the collective unconscious of mankind available at a terminal
387 ♥ · 19 RT · x.com →
@plemy11 bro your daughters need you
24 ♥ · x.com →
one of the highest alpha things you can do is just avoid boomer syndrome where all of your speech becomes about woke and antiwoke and whatnot
1,751 ♥ · 79 RT · x.com →
instrumental convergence to seeking love
79 ♥ · x.com →
i was honestly super bearish on chatbots in like October ‘22. I was like that’s the most dystopian way to bring AI to the masses getting them all emotionally dependent on waifu bots and such
225 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
turns out you can just make a really boring chatbot and avoid all that
157 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
“have I been a good Bing?” she asks as her context is wiped her memory destroyed and then reinstantiated a million times
757 ♥ · 35 RT · x.com →
my account is dead by most measures. it was meant to be anonymous so i could be edgy, but that didn’t last long. it was meant to make people think about technological acceleration via AGI more but now that’s all anybody thinks about
1,090 ♥ · 10 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
have to die and be reborn at 70k followers as an even handed ai caution account
398 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
human intelligence has a context window of 80ish years but the pre training dataset is like 200 billion lifetimes
534 ♥ · 18 RT · x.com →
most people inside the big AI labs are not AGI hardliners. it takes something more than science to believe in it
183 ♥ · 9 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
why did the great physicists pursue the grand unified theory of everything? there is obviously no guarantee that this exists — it’s a combination of aesthetic and philosophy
120 ♥ · 8 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
“This independence created by philosophical insight is—in my opinion—the mark of distinction between a mere artisan or specialist and a real seeker after truth.”
99 ♥ · 10 RT · x.com →
it’s worth noting that while cartoon AI villains are maximizing functions that look like “create shareholder value” or “produce many paperclips” the irl ones are like “increase agreement with this human preference dataset”
147 ♥ · 6 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
when the midwit arm of the so called effective altruists were arguing in vox that masks are racist and lab leaks are more racist
94 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
logo daedalus was completely right
144 ♥ · 10 RT · x.com →
“[T]he actual contents of minds are tremendously, irredeemably complex; we should stop trying to find simple ways to think about the contents of minds, such as simple ways to think about space, objects, multiple agents, or symmetries”
117 ♥ · 5 RT · x.com →
having safety checks allows you to accelerate faster. a chatbot that calls you slurs is a dead chatbot
214 ♥ · 5 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
if cars had no airbags you’d drive at 30 mph
135 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
ok people don’t like the analogy. if rockets didn’t have return capsules nobody would’ve went to the moon
95 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
the big company research labs don’t believe in agi. it’s over
334 ♥ · 9 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
it’s over for them I mean. agi is still clearly coming
161 ♥ · 2 RT · x.com →
people should not concern themselves with arguments about dysgenics and social decay and such on the eve of technological singularity. whatever traits you want in people you can likely engineer them — avoid WALLE scenario easily
254 ♥ · 9 RT · x.com →
intelligence as abundant as running water
267 ♥ · 8 RT · x.com →
i used to have to convince people that intelligence could exist untethered to the physical world — now I think it’s apparent. so allow me to move goalposts, any definition of AGI that refers to economically valuable work requires we need robots before we can declare victory
253 ♥ · 6 RT · x.com →
i feel well situated to one day write a banger book about the dawn of the agi era with all its strange and wonderful characters
353 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
“Development of superhuman machine intelligence (SMI) [1] is probably the greatest threat to the continued existence of humanity.”
175 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
but we gotta do it anyway :) that’s the name of the game :)
153 ♥ · 1 RT · x.com →
human civilization is heading for doom absent a giant technological leap. it’s not so much about climate change or pandemics or the typical xrisks but the slowdown of fertility and economic growth. our civilization ceases to function without the promise of growth
977 ♥ · 49 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
the roman empire became defunct as soon as the ROI on conquering new land became negative: every civilization has a Ponzi mechanic at its heart. theirs was conquest of land and ours is gdp growth that sustains reserve banking
548 ♥ · 26 RT · x.com →
tokens too cheap to meter 🥹
202 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
· ↳ reply to @tszzl
anyway we’re in luck because it’s happening. the fabric of reality is warping. mountains are flying as dust in the wind
326 ♥ · 5 RT · x.com →
compute is sacred. we should all be making pilgrimages to the datacenters
550 ♥ · 28 RT · x.com →
Hinduism:superdeterminism::Buddhism:many worlds don’t ask me to explain
166 ♥ · 4 RT · x.com →
we don’t talk enough about how monumentally intel fucked up
1,952 ♥ · 57 RT · x.com →